In 1979, Tatel joined the law firm Hogan & Hartson (now Hogan Lovells), where he founded and headed the firm's education practice until his appointment to the D.C. Circuit.[2] While on sabbatical from Hogan & Hartson, Tatel spent a year as a lecturer at Stanford Law School. He also previously served as Acting General Counsel for the Legal Services Corporation.[3]
Federal judicial service
Tatel was nominated by President Bill Clinton on June 20, 1994, to a seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated by Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg. He was confirmed by the United States Senate on October 6, 1994, by a voice vote, and received commission on October 7, 1994.[4] He announced his intent to assume senior status upon confirmation of a successor on February 12, 2021.[5] Tatel assumed senior status on May 16, 2022.[4] He announced his plans to retire from the bench in September 2023 to return to a law firm where he worked before he became a federal judge.[6][7] He retired from judicial service on January 16, 2024.[4]
In 2005, Tatel was assigned to Massachusetts v. EPA, a case that centered on whether the Clean Air Act allowed the EPA to regulate greenhouse gases. In a dissenting opinion, Tatel sided with the EPA, finding that Congress had clearly given the agency authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.[10] The Supreme Court again agreed with Tatel, vacating the D.C. Circuit's opinion in a 5-4 decision.[11]
In April 2020, Tatel wrote for the unanimous panel when it invalidated as arbitrary and capricious a directive by EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt attempting to prohibit scientists who had received EPA research grants from serving on its advisory panels.[12][13]
Voting Rights
In 2008, Tatel authored the majority opinion in Northwest Austin Mun. Util. Dist. One v. Mukasey, which held that Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act is constitutional.[14] Less than four years later, Tatel also wrote the majority opinion in Shelby County v. Holder, again upholding the constitutionality of Section 5 of the Voting Rights. In a landmark voting rights decision, the Supreme Court eventually reversed his opinion by a 5-4 vote.[15]
Privilege
Tatel dissented in two important attorney-client privilege cases. In 1997, he wrote the dissenting opinion in Swidler & Berlin v. United States, explaining that the notes from conversations between Vincent Foster and his attorney were protected by the attorney-client privilege even after Foster’s death. The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 ruling, later sided with Tatel and ruled to protect the notes.[16] The following year, Tatel concurred in part and dissented in part in In Re: Bruce Lindsey, a case involving whether Special Counsel Ken Starr could seek grand jury testimony about Monica Lewinsky from deputy White House counsel Bruce Lindsey. Tatel argued that presidents should enjoy attorney-client privilege in their communications with White House Counsel.[17]
First Amendment
In 2005, Tatel authored a concurring opinion in In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena, Judith Miller, a case about whether the First Amendment allows reporters to refuse to disclose their sources to a grand jury. Tatel agreed with the majority that the First Amendment did not protect Judith Miller in the case, but he wrote separately to argue that federal courts should recognize a "reporter's privilege."[18]
In 2020, Tatel authored the unanimous opinion in Karem v. Trump, which upheld a judge's order restoring a White House press pass to a reporter who got into an argument with one of President Donald Trump's supporters.[19][20]
Guantanamo Bay
Tatel heard several appeals from prisoners held in the Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp. In 2017, Tatel, along with Judges Rogers and Griffith, wrote a per curiam opinion vacating a decision of a military judge against Khalid Sheikh Mohammad because of biased statements made by the judge against the defendant.[21] In 2019, Tatel also wrote a majority opinion vacating decisions against Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, finding that the military judge wrongly hid his pursuit of a job with the government while presiding over al-Nashiri's case.[22] Tatel dissented in a 2011 case involving Adnan Farhad Abd Al Latif, Al Latif v. Obama. Tatel would have upheld a district court decision ordering Al Latif's release under Boumediene v. Bush.[23]
Disability
In 2019, Tatel authored the majority opinion in D.L. v. District of Columbia, a class action lawsuit filed by the parents of D.C. children. Tatel found that the District violated the "Child Find" requirement of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act by failing to provide adequate special education services to D.C. children.[24][25]
Tatel, David S. (September 13, 1997). Alexander F. Morrison Lecture. Annual Meeting of the California State Bar, San Diego, CA
Tatel, David S. (June 25, 2002). Remarks of David S. Tatel on the Occasion of the Spencer Foundation's 30th Anniversary Dinner. Chicago, IL
Tatel, David S. (October 16, 2003). Remarks on the Occasion of the Portrait Hanging Ceremony for the Honorable Patricia Wald. Washington, D.C.
Tatel, David S. (January 19, 2004). Macalester College Graduation Ceremony Speech. St. Paul, MN
Tatel, David S., "Madison Lecture: Judicial Methodology, Southern School Desegregation, and the Rule of Law, 79 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1071 (2004).
Tatel, David S. (October 27, 2006). “Remarks on the Occasion of the Portrait Hanging Ceremony for the Honorable Stephen F. Williams”. Washington, D.C.
Tatel, David S. (November 15, 2008). Remarks of David S. Tatel. The American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia, PA
Tatel, David S. (January 17, 2009). Litigation and Integration Then and Now. Delivered at Passing the Torch: the Past, Present, and Future of Interdistrict School Desegregation, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA
Tatel, David S. (December 8, 2009). Remarks on the Occasion of the Portrait Hanging Ceremony for the Honorable James Robertson. Washington, D.C.
Tatel, David S. (May 6, 2010). "Legacy of Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens". CSPAN, Washington, D.C
Tatel, David S. (April 23, 2012). Habeas Corpus: Remarks of Judge David S. Tatel. Cosmos Club, Washington, D.C.
Tatel, David S. (April 5, 2013). Remarks on the Occasion of the Portrait Hanging Ceremony for the Honorable David B. Sentelle. Washington, D.C.
Tatel, David S. (November 15, 2013). Remarks of David S. Tatel. The American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia, PA
Tatel, David S. (April 28, 2018). Separation of Powers and Statutory Interpretation: A Battle Hidden in Plain Sight. The American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia, PA
Tatel, David S. and Ruther Bader Ginsburg. (October 24, 2018). Tenth Annual Judge Thomas A. Flannery Lecture, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Flannery Lecture Series, Washington, D.C.
Tatel, David S. (September 16, 2022). Expression of Gratitude on the Occasion of the Portrait Hanging Ceremony for the Honorable David S. Tatel. Washington, D.C.
Tatel, David S. (March 18, 2022). "Life, Law, and Vision Loss with Judge Tatel". Hadley Helps.
Liptak, Adam (May 27, 2024). "Lessons from Judge David Tatel's Guide Dog on Blindness and Vision". New York Times.
Marimow, Ann E. (June 7, 2024). "Retired judge David Tatel issues a stark warning about the Supreme Court." The Washington Post.
Tatel, David S. (June 11, 2024). Vision: A Memoir of Blindness and Justice. Little, Brown and Company.
Tatel, David S. (June 11, 2024). "David S. Tatel Book Talk with Jane Mayer". Politics and Prose, Washington, D.C.
Tatel, David S. (June 11, 2024). "Judge David Tatel on Becoming the Blind Role Model he Never Had." National Public Radio.
Tatel, David S. (June 14, 2024). "Retired offers stark warning about U.S. Supreme Court". CNN, The Lead with Jake Tapper.
Tatel, David S. (June 19, 2024). "Booknotes + Podcast - Judge David Tatel, 'Vision'". CSPAN, Washington, D.C.
Tatel, David S. (July 3, 2024). "A Former Federal Judge Fears for Democracy". Fresh Air, NPR.
^Johnson, Earl Jr. (2014). To Establish Justice for All: The Past and Future of Civil Legal Aid in the United States. Santa Barbara: Praeger. p. 456. ISBN978-0-313-35706-0.