Early societies relied on a gift economy based on favours. Later, as commerce developed, less permanent human relations were formed, depending more on transitory needs rather than enduring social desires. Customers are generally said to be the purchasers of goods and services, while clients are those who receive personalized advice and solutions.[3] Although such distinctions have no contemporary semantic weight, agencies such as law firms, film studios, and health care providers tend to prefer client, while grocery stores, banks, and restaurants tend to prefer customer instead.
Client
A drawing of an attorney with a client
The term client is derived from Latin clients or care meaning "to incline" or "to bend", and is related to the emotive idea of closure. It is widely believed that people only change their habits when motivated by greed and fear.[4] Winning a client is therefore a singular event, which is why professional specialists who deal with particular problems tend to attract long-term clients rather than regular customers.[3] Unlike regular customers, who buy merely on price and value, long-term clients buy on experience and trust.[3]
Customer
Clients who habitually return to a seller develop customs that allow for regular, sustained commerce that allows the seller to develop statistical models to optimize production processes (which change the nature or form of goods or services) and supply chains (which change the location or formalize the changes of ownership or entitlement transactions).
An "end customer" denotes the person at the end of a supply chain who ultimately purchases or utilised the goods or services.[5]
Employer
A client paying for construction work is often referred to as an "employer".[6][7]
an end user or ultimate customer who does not re-sell the things bought but is the actual consumer or an agent such as a Purchasing officer for the consumer.[8][1]
A customer may or may not also be a consumer, but the two notions are distinct.[8][1] A customer purchases goods; a consumer uses them.[9][10] An ultimate customer may be a consumer as well, but just as equally may have purchased items for someone else to consume. An intermediate customer is not a consumer at all.[8][1] The situation is somewhat complicated in that ultimate customers of so-called industrial goods and services (who are entities such as government bodies, manufacturers, and educational and medical institutions) either themselves use up the goods and services that they buy, or incorporate them into other finished products, and so are technically consumers, too. However, they are rarely called that, but are rather called industrial customers or business-to-business customers.[8] Similarly, customers who buy services rather than goods are rarely called consumers.[1]
Six Sigma doctrine places (active) customers in opposition to two other classes of people: not-customers and non-customers:
Customers of a given business have actively dealt with that business within a particular recent period that depends on the product sold.
Not-customers are either past customers who are no longer customers or potential customers who choose to interact with the competition.
Non-customers are people who are active in a different market segment entirely.
Geoff Tennant, a Six Sigma consultant from the United Kingdom, uses the following analogy to explain the difference: A supermarket's customer is the person buying milk at that supermarket; a not-customer buys milk from a competing supermarket, whereas a non-customer does not buy milk from supermarkets at all but rather "has milk delivered to the door in the traditional British way".[11]
Tennant also categorizes customers in another way that is employed outside the fields of marketing.[12] While marketers, market regulation, and economists use the intermediate/ultimate categorization, the field of customer service more often[quantify] categorizes customers into two classes:
An external customer of an organization is a customer who is not directly connected to that organization.[12][13]
An internal customer is a customer who is directly connected to an organization, and is usually (but not necessarily) internal to the organization. Internal customers are usually stakeholders, employees, or shareholders, but the definition also encompasses creditors and external regulators.[14][13]
Before the introduction of the notion of an internal customer, external customers were, simply, customers.[citation needed]Quality-management writer Joseph M. Juran popularized the concept, introducing it in 1988 in the fourth edition of his Quality Control Handbook (Juran 1988).[15][16][17] The idea has since gained wide acceptance in the literature on total quality management and service marketing;[15] and many organizations as of 2016[update] recognize the customer satisfaction of internal customers as a precursor to, and a prerequisite for, external customer satisfaction, with authors such as Tansuhaj, Randall & McCullough 1991 regarding service organizations which design products for internal customer satisfaction as better able to satisfy the needs of external customers.[18] Research on the theory and practice of managing the internal customer continues as of 2016[update] in a variety of service-sectorindustries.[19][20][need quotation to verify]
Arguments against use of the term "internal customers"
Leading authors in management and marketing, like Peter Drucker, Philip Kotler, W. Edwards Deming, etc., have not used the term "internal customer" in their works. They consider the "customer" as a very specific role in society which represents a crucial part in the relationship between the demand and the supply. Some of the most important characteristics of any customer are that: any customer is never in a subordination line with any supplier; any customer has equal positions with the supplier within negotiations, and any customer can accept or reject any offer for a service or a product. Peter Drucker wrote, "They are all people who can say no, people who have the choice to accept or reject what you offer."[21]
In opposition to the stated customer's characteristics, relationships between colleagues in a company are always based on subordination – direct or indirect. Company employees are obliged to follow the processes of their companies. Company employees do not have the authority to choose a unit/colleague to fulfill any task. Company employees are obliged to use an existing unit/colleague by using the company's structure and approved processes, therefore these internal relationships are not considered as an option.
Many authors in ITIL and Six Sigma methodologies define "internal customer" as an internal part of a company that uses the output of another part of a company as its input. But actually, this definition describes better a classical internal process rather than a relationship between a customer and a supplier. Peter Drucker considers that there are no customers inside organizations. He wrote "Inside an organization, there are only cost centers. The only profit center is a customer whose check has not bounced."[22] In addition, William Deming advises managers, in his 9th point, to "Break down barriers between departments. They must work as a team",[23] which means that there have to be teamwork in a company rather than a supplier/customer relationship. One more argument, even the ITIL methodology admits that "the term 'colleague' may be more accurate in describing how two internal groups are related to one another.".[24]
^Drucker, Peter F.; Collins, Jim; Kotler, Philip; Kouzes, James; Rodin, Judith; Rangan, V. Kasturi; Hesselbein, Frances (2008). The five most important questions you will ever ask about your organization (Third ed.). Jossey-Bass. Under the chapter "Question 2: Who Is Our Customer?", p. 25. ISBN978-0-470-22756-5.
^Drucker, Peter F. (2002). Management Challenges for the 21st Century. PerfectBound™, HarperCollins. 4 Information Challenges, under the topic "Where the Results Are". ISBN0-06-0546794.
^Deming, W. Edwards (2000). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
^ITIL® Service Strategy (Second ed.). TSO (The Stationery Office). 2011. Table 3.1 Differences between internal and external customers; under the line “Link to business strategy and objectives”. ISBN9780113313044.
References
Blythe, Jim (2008). Essentials of Marketing (4th ed.). Pearson Education. ISBN978-0-273-71736-2.
Frain, John (1999). "Customers and customer buying behaviour". Introduction to marketing (4th ed.). Cengage Learning EMEA. ISBN978-1-86152-147-7.
Kansal, B.B.; Rao, P.C.K. (2006). "Environmental Factors in Management". Preface to Management (Parragon Books). Ganga Dhar Chaudhary. ISBN978-81-89091-00-2.
Kendall, Stephanie D. (2007). "Customer Service from the Customer's Perspective". In Fogli, Lawrence (ed.). Customer Service Delivery: Research and Best Practices. J-B SIOP Professional Practice Series. Vol. 20. John Wiley and Sons. ISBN978-0-7879-8310-9.
Papasolomou-Doukakis, Ioanna (2001). "Customer satisfaction". In Kitchen, Philip J.; Proctor, Tony (eds.). The informed student guide to marketing. ITBP Textbooks Series. Cengage Learning EMEA. ISBN978-1-86152-546-8.
Reeves, Carol A.; Bednar, David A. (2005). "Defining Quality". In Wood, John Cunningham; Wood, Michael C. (eds.). Joseph M. Juran: critical evaluations in business and management. Routledge. ISBN978-0-415-32571-4.
Stracke, Christian (2006). "Process-oriented quality management". In Ehlers, Ulf-Daniel; Pawlowski, Jan Martin (eds.). Handbook on quality and standardisation in e-learning. Springer. ISBN978-3-540-32787-5.
Tennant, Geoff (2001). Six Sigma: SPC and TQM in manufacturing and services. Gower Publishing. ISBN978-0-566-08374-7.
Tansuhaj, Patriya; Randall, Donna; McCullough, Jim (1991). "Applying the Internal Marketing Concept Within Large Organizations: As Applied to a Credit Union". Journal of Professional Services Marketing. 6 (2). Taylor & Francis: 193–202. doi:10.1300/J090v06n02_14.
