You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in Swedish. (March 2022) Click [show] for important translation instructions.
View a machine-translated version of the Swedish article.
Machine translation, like DeepL or Google Translate, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia.
Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article.
You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is Content in this edit is translated from the existing Swedish Wikipedia article at [[:sv:Coronakommissionen]]; see its history for attribution.
You may also add the template {{Translated|sv|Coronakommissionen}} to the talk page.
In December 2020, a report by the commission criticised the government for failing to protect elderly people in aged care due to the high level of community spread.[3][4] In October 2021, the commission's second report characterised the government's response in early 2020 as "insufficient" and "late".[5]
The commission said in their final report in February 2022 that the government's strategy of not introducing lockdowns, as many other countries had done, was "fundamentally correct" for maintaining individuals' personal freedoms over those in other countries, but was critical of the decisions not to introduce "more rigorous and intrusive disease prevention and control measures" in February and March 2020.[2] It also said that the government had delegated too much responsibility to the Public Health Agency of Sweden and the responsible bodies for decision making were not always clear.[2]
