Conspiracy theory

For other uses, see Conspiracy theory (disambiguation).

The Eye of Providence, as seen on the US $1 bill, has been perceived by some to be evidence of a conspiracy linking the Founding Fathers of the United States to the Illuminati.^{[1]: 58 [2]: 47–49}

A conspiracy theory is an explanation for an event or situation that asserts the existence of a conspiracy (generally by powerful sinister groups, often political in motivation),^[3][4][5] when other explanations are more probable.^[3][6][7] The term generally has a negative connotation, implying that the appeal of a conspiracy theory is based in prejudice, emotional conviction, or insufficient evidence.^[8] A conspiracy theory is distinct from a conspiracy; it refers to a hypothesized conspiracy with specific characteristics, including but not limited to opposition to the mainstream consensus among those who are qualified to evaluate its accuracy, such as scientists or historians.^[9][10][11]

Conspiracy theories tend to be internally consistent and correlate with each other;^[12] they are generally designed to resist falsification either by evidence against them or a lack of evidence for them.^[13] They are reinforced by circular reasoning: both evidence against the conspiracy and absence of evidence for it are misinterpreted as evidence of its truth.^[8][14] Stephan Lewandowsky observes "This interpretation relies on the notion that, the stronger the evidence against a conspiracy, the more the conspirators must want people to believe their version of events."^[15] As a consequence, the conspiracy becomes a matter of faith rather than something that can be proven or disproven.^[1][16] Studies have linked belief in conspiracy theories to distrust of authority and political cynicism.^[17][18][19] Some researchers suggest that conspiracist ideation—belief in conspiracy theories—may be psychologically harmful or pathological.^[20][21] Such belief is correlated with psychological projection, paranoia, and Machiavellianism.^[22][23]

Psychologists usually attribute belief in conspiracy theories to a number of psychopathological conditions such as paranoia, schizotypy, narcissism, and insecure attachment,^[9] or to a form of cognitive bias called "illusory pattern perception".^[24][25] It has also been linked with the so-called Dark triad personality types, whose common feature is lack of empathy.^[26] However, a 2020 review article found that most cognitive scientists view conspiracy theorizing as typically nonpathological, given that unfounded belief in conspiracy is common across both historical and contemporary cultures, and may arise from innate human tendencies towards gossip, group cohesion, and religion.^[9] One historical review of conspiracy theories concluded that "Evidence suggests that the aversive feelings that people experience when in crisis—fear, uncertainty, and the feeling of being out of control—stimulate a motivation to make sense of the situation, increasing the likelihood of perceiving conspiracies in social situations."^[27]

Historically, conspiracy theories have been closely linked to prejudice, propaganda, witch hunts, wars, and genocides.^{[12][28][29][30][31]} They are often strongly believed by the perpetrators of terrorist attacks, and were used as justification by Timothy McVeigh and Anders Breivik, as well as by governments such as Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union,^[28] and Turkey.^[32] AIDS denialism by the government of South Africa, motivated by conspiracy theories, caused an estimated 330,000 deaths from AIDS.^[33][34][35] QAnon and denialism about the 2020 United States presidential election results led to the January 6 United States Capitol attack,^[36][37][38] and belief in conspiracy theories about genetically modified foods led the government of Zambia to reject food aid during a famine,^[29] at a time when three million people in the country were suffering from hunger.^[39] Conspiracy theories are a significant obstacle to improvements in public health,^[29][40] encouraging opposition to such public health measures as vaccination and water fluoridation. They have been linked to outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases.^{[29][33][40][41]} Other effects of conspiracy theories include reduced trust in scientific evidence,^[12][29][42] radicalization and ideological reinforcement of extremist groups,^[28][43] and negative consequences for the economy.^[28]

Conspiracy theories once limited to fringe audiences have become commonplace in mass media, the Internet, and social media,^[9][12] emerging as a cultural phenomenon of the late 20th and early 21st centuries.^{[44][45][46][47]} They are widespread around the world and are often commonly believed, some even held by the majority of the population.^[48][49][50] Interventions to reduce the occurrence of conspiracy beliefs include maintaining an open society, encouraging people to use analytical thinking, and reducing feelings of uncertainty, anxiety, or powerlessness.^{[42][48][49][51]}

Origin and usage

The Oxford English Dictionary defines conspiracy theory as "the theory that an event or phenomenon occurs as a result of a conspiracy between interested parties; spec. a belief that some covert but influential agency (typically political in motivation and oppressive in intent) is responsible for an unexplained event". It cites a 1909 article in The American Historical Review as the earliest usage example,^[52][53] although it also appeared in print for several decades before.^[54]

The earliest known usage was by the American author Charles Astor Bristed, in a letter to the editor published in The New York Times on January 11, 1863.^[55] He used it to refer to claims that British aristocrats were intentionally weakening the United States during the American Civil War in order to advance their financial interests.

England has had quite enough to do in Europe and Asia, without going out of her way to meddle with America. It was a physical and moral impossibility that she could be carrying on a gigantic conspiracy against us. But our masses, having only a rough general knowledge of foreign affairs, and not unnaturally somewhat exaggerating the space which we occupy in the world's eye, do not appreciate the complications which rendered such a conspiracy impossible. They only look at the sudden right-about-face movement of the English Press and public, which is most readily accounted for on the conspiracy theory.^[55]

The term is also used as a way to discredit dissenting analyses.^[56] Robert Blaskiewicz comments that examples of the term were used as early as the nineteenth century and states that its usage has always been derogatory.^[57] According to a study by Andrew McKenzie-McHarg, in contrast, in the nineteenth century the term conspiracy theory simply "suggests a plausible postulate of a conspiracy" and "did not, at this stage, carry any connotations, either negative or positive", though sometimes a postulate so-labeled was criticized.^[58] The author and activist George Monbiot argued that the terms "conspiracy theory" and "conspiracy theorist" are misleading, as conspiracies truly exist and theories are "rational explanations subject to disproof". Instead, he proposed the terms "conspiracy fiction" and "conspiracy fantasist".^[59]

Alleged CIA origins

The Warren Report

The term "conspiracy theory" is itself the subject of a conspiracy theory, which posits that the term was popularized by the CIA in order to discredit conspiratorial believers, particularly critics of the Warren Commission, by making them a target of ridicule.^[60] In his 2013 book Conspiracy Theory in America, the political scientist Lance deHaven-Smith wrote that the term entered everyday language in the United States after 1964, the year in which the Warren Commission published its findings on the assassination of John F. Kennedy, with The New York Times running five stories that year using the term.^[61]

Whether the CIA was responsible for popularising the term "conspiracy theory" was analyzed by Michael Butter, a Professor of American Literary and Cultural History at the University of Tübingen. Butter wrote in 2020 that the CIA document Concerning Criticism of the Warren Report, which proponents of the theory use as evidence of CIA motive and intention, does not contain the phrase "conspiracy theory" in the singular, and only uses the term "conspiracy theories" once, in the sentence: "Conspiracy theories have frequently thrown suspicion on our organisation [sic], for example, by falsely alleging that Lee Harvey Oswald worked for us."^[62]

Difference from conspiracy

A conspiracy theory is not simply a conspiracy, which refers to any covert plan involving two or more people.^[10] In contrast, the term "conspiracy theory" refers to hypothesized conspiracies that have specific characteristics. For example, conspiracist beliefs invariably oppose the mainstream consensus among those people who are qualified to evaluate their accuracy, such as scientists or historians.^[11] Conspiracy theorists see themselves as having privileged access to socially persecuted knowledge or a stigmatized mode of thought that separates them from the masses who believe the official account.^[10] Michael Barkun describes a conspiracy theory as a "template imposed upon the world to give the appearance of order to events".^[10]

Real conspiracies, even very simple ones, are difficult to conceal and routinely experience unexpected problems.^[63] In contrast, conspiracy theories suggest that conspiracies are unrealistically successful and that groups of conspirators, such as bureaucracies, can act with near-perfect competence and secrecy. The causes of events or situations are simplified to exclude complex or interacting factors, as well as the role of chance and unintended consequences. Nearly all observations are explained as having been deliberately planned by the alleged conspirators.^[63]

In conspiracy theories, the conspirators are usually claimed to be acting with extreme malice.^[63] As described by Robert Brotherton:

The malevolent intent assumed by most conspiracy theories goes far beyond everyday plots borne out of self-interest, corruption, cruelty, and criminality. The postulated conspirators are not merely people with selfish agendas or differing values. Rather, conspiracy theories postulate a black-and-white world in which good is struggling against evil. The general public is cast as the victim of organised persecution, and the motives of the alleged conspirators often verge on pure maniacal evil. At the very least, the conspirators are said to have an almost inhuman disregard for the basic liberty and well-being of the general population. More grandiose conspiracy theories portray the conspirators as being Evil Incarnate: of having caused all the ills from which we suffer, committing abominable acts of unthinkable cruelty on a routine basis, and striving ultimately to subvert or destroy everything we hold dear.^[63]

Examples

Further information: List of conspiracy theories

A conspiracy theory may take any matter as its subject, but certain subjects attract greater interest than others. Favored subjects include famous deaths and assassinations, morally dubious government activities, suppressed technologies, and "false flag" terrorism. Among the longest-standing and most widely recognized conspiracy theories are notions concerning the assassination of John F. Kennedy, the 1969 Apollo Moon landings, and the 9/11 terrorist attacks, as well as numerous theories pertaining to alleged plots for world domination by various groups, both real and imaginary.^[64]

Popularity

Conspiracy beliefs are widespread around the world.^[48] In rural Africa, common targets of conspiracy theorizing include societal elites, enemy tribes, and the Western world, with conspirators often alleged to enact their plans via sorcery or witchcraft; one common belief identifies modern technology as itself being a form of sorcery, created with the goal of harming or controlling the people.^[48] In China, one widely published conspiracy theory claims that a number of events including the rise of Hitler, the 1997 Asian financial crisis, and climate change were planned by the Rothschild family, which may have led to effects on discussions about China's currency policy.^[49][65]

Conspiracy theories once limited to fringe audiences have become commonplace in mass media, contributing to conspiracism emerging as a cultural phenomenon in the United States of the late 20th and early 21st centuries.^{[44][45][46][47]} The general predisposition to believe conspiracy theories cuts across partisan and ideological lines. Conspiratorial thinking is correlated with antigovernmental orientations and a low sense of political efficacy, with conspiracy believers perceiving a governmental threat to individual rights and displaying a deep skepticism that who one votes for really matters.^[66]

Conspiracy theories are often commonly believed, some even being held by the majority of the population.^[48][49][50] A broad cross-section of Americans today gives credence to at least some conspiracy theories.^[67] For instance, a study conducted in 2016 found that 10% of Americans think the chemtrail conspiracy theory is "completely true" and 20–30% think it is "somewhat true".^[68] This puts "the equivalent of 120 million Americans in the 'chemtrails are real' camp".^[68] Belief in conspiracy theories has therefore become a topic of interest for sociologists, psychologists and experts in folklore.

Conspiracy theories are widely present on the Web in the form of blogs and YouTube videos, as well as on social media. Whether the Web has increased the prevalence of conspiracy theories or not is an open research question.^[69] The presence and representation of conspiracy theories in search engine results has been monitored and studied, showing significant variation across different topics, and a general absence of reputable, high-quality links in the results.^[70]

One conspiracy theory that propagated through former US President Barack Obama's time in office^[71] claimed that he was born in Kenya, instead of Hawaii where he was actually born.^[72] Former governor of Arkansas and political opponent of Obama Mike Huckabee made headlines in 2011^[73] when he, among other members of Republican leadership, continued to question Obama's citizenship status.

Belief in conspiracy theories in the United States, December 2020 – NPR/Ipsos poll, ±3.3%^[74]

Conspiracy theory	Believe	Not sure
"A group of Satan-worshipping elites who run a child sex ring are trying to control our politics and media" (QAnon)	17%	37%
"Several mass shootings in recent years were staged hoaxes" (crisis actor theory)	12%	27%
Barack Obama was not born in the United States (birtherism)	19%	22%
Moon landing conspiracy theories	8%	20%
9/11 conspiracy theories	7%	20%

Types

A conspiracy theory can be local or international, focused on single events or covering multiple incidents and entire countries, regions and periods of history.^[10] According to Russell Muirhead and Nancy Rosenblum, historically, traditional conspiracism has entailed a "theory", but over time, "conspiracy" and "theory" have become decoupled, as modern conspiracism is often without any kind of theory behind it.^[75][76]

Walker's five kinds

Jesse Walker (2013) has identified five kinds of conspiracy theories:^[77]

• The "Enemy Outside" refers to theories based on figures alleged to be scheming against a community from without.
• The "Enemy Within" finds the conspirators lurking inside the nation, indistinguishable from ordinary citizens.
• The "Enemy Above" involves powerful people manipulating events for their own gain.
• The "Enemy Below" features the lower classes working to overturn the social order.
• The "Benevolent Conspiracies" are angelic forces that work behind the scenes to improve the world and help people.

Barkun's three types

Michael Barkun has identified three classifications of conspiracy theory:^[78]

• Event conspiracy theories. This refers to limited and well-defined events. Examples may include such conspiracies theories as those concerning the Kennedy assassination, 9/11, and the spread of AIDS.
• Systemic conspiracy theories. The conspiracy is believed to have broad goals, usually conceived as securing control of a country, a region, or even the entire world. The goals are sweeping, whilst the conspiratorial machinery is generally simple: a single, evil organization implements a plan to infiltrate and subvert existing institutions. This is a common scenario in conspiracy theories that focus on the alleged machinations of Jews, Freemasons, Communism, or the Catholic Church.
• Superconspiracy theories. For Barkun, such theories link multiple alleged conspiracies together hierarchically. At the summit is a distant but all-powerful evil force. His cited examples are the ideas of David Icke and Milton William Cooper.

Rothbard: shallow vs. deep

Murray Rothbard argues in favor of a model that contrasts "deep" conspiracy theories to "shallow" ones. According to Rothbard, a "shallow" theorist observes an event and asks Cui bono? ("Who benefits?"), jumping to the conclusion that a posited beneficiary is responsible for covertly influencing events. On the other hand, the "deep" conspiracy theorist begins with a hunch and then seeks out evidence. Rothbard describes this latter activity as a matter of confirming with certain facts one's initial paranoia.^[79]

Lack of evidence

Belief in conspiracy theories is generally based not on evidence, but in the faith of the believer.^[80] Noam Chomsky contrasts conspiracy theory to institutional analysis which focuses mostly on the public, long-term behavior of publicly known institutions, as recorded in, for example, scholarly documents or mainstream media reports.^[81] Conspiracy theory conversely posits the existence of secretive coalitions of individuals and speculates on their alleged activities.^[82][83] Belief in conspiracy theories is associated with biases in reasoning, such as the conjunction fallacy.^[84]

Clare Birchall at King's College London describes conspiracy theory as a "form of popular knowledge or interpretation".^[a] The use of the word 'knowledge' here suggests ways in which conspiracy theory may be considered in relation to legitimate modes of knowing.^[b] The relationship between legitimate and illegitimate knowledge, Birchall claims, is closer than common dismissals of conspiracy theory contend.^[86]

Theories involving multiple conspirators that are proven to be correct, such as the Watergate scandal, are usually referred to as investigative journalism or historical analysis rather than conspiracy theory.^[87] Bjerg (2016) writes: "the way we normally use the term conspiracy theory excludes instances where the theory has been generally accepted as true. The Watergate scandal serves as the standard reference."^[88] By contrast, the term "Watergate conspiracy theory" is used to refer to a variety of hypotheses in which those convicted in the conspiracy were in fact the victims of a deeper conspiracy.^[89] There are also attempts to analyze the theory of conspiracy theories (conspiracy theory theory) to ensure that the term "conspiracy theory" is used to refer to narratives that have been debunked by experts, rather than as a generalized dismissal.^[90]

Rhetoric

Conspiracy theory rhetoric exploits several important cognitive biases, including proportionality bias, attribution bias, and confirmation bias.^[33] Their arguments often take the form of asking reasonable questions, but without providing an answer based on strong evidence.^[91] Conspiracy theories are most successful when proponents can gather followers from the general public, such as in politics, religion and journalism. These proponents may not necessarily believe the conspiracy theory; instead, they may just use it in an attempt to gain public approval. Conspiratorial claims can act as a successful rhetorical strategy to convince a portion of the public via appeal to emotion.^[29]

Conspiracy theories typically justify themselves by focusing on gaps or ambiguities in knowledge, and then arguing that the true explanation for this must be a conspiracy.^[63] In contrast, any evidence that directly supports their claims is generally of low quality. For example, conspiracy theories are often dependent on eyewitness testimony, despite its unreliability, while disregarding objective analyses of the evidence.^[63]

Conspiracy theories are not able to be falsified and are reinforced by fallacious arguments. In particular, the logical fallacy circular reasoning is used by conspiracy theorists: both evidence against the conspiracy and an absence of evidence for it are re-interpreted as evidence of its truth,^[8][14] whereby the conspiracy becomes a matter of faith rather than something that can be proved or disproved.^[1][16] The epistemic strategy of conspiracy theories has been called "cascade logic": each time new evidence becomes available, a conspiracy theory is able to dismiss it by claiming that even more people must be part of the cover-up.^[29][63] Any information that contradicts the conspiracy theory is suggested to be disinformation by the alleged conspiracy.^[42] Similarly, the continued lack of evidence directly supporting conspiracist claims is portrayed as confirming the existence of a conspiracy of silence; the fact that other people have not found or exposed any conspiracy is taken as evidence that those people are part of the plot, rather than considering that it may be because no conspiracy exists.^[33][63] This strategy lets conspiracy theories insulate themselves from neutral analyses of the evidence, and makes them resistant to questioning or correction, which is called "epistemic self-insulation".^[33][63]

In 2013, 97% of peer-reviewed climate science papers that took a position on the cause of global warming said that humans are responsible, 3% said they were not. Among Fox News guests the same year, this was presented as a false balance between the two viewpoints, with 31% of invited guests believing it was happening and 69% not.^[92]

Conspiracy theorists often take advantage of false balance in the media. They may claim to be presenting a legitimate alternative viewpoint that deserves equal time to argue its case; for example, this strategy has been used by the Teach the Controversy campaign to promote intelligent design, which often claims that there is a conspiracy of scientists suppressing their views. If they successfully find a platform to present their views in a debate format, they focus on using rhetorical ad hominems and attacking perceived flaws in the mainstream account, while avoiding any discussion of the shortcomings in their own position.^[29]

The typical approach of conspiracy theories is to challenge any action or statement from authorities, using even the most tenuous justifications. Responses are then assessed using a double standard, where failing to provide an immediate response to the satisfaction of the conspiracy theorist will be claimed to prove a conspiracy. Any minor errors in the response are heavily emphasized, while deficiencies in the arguments of other proponents are generally excused.^[29]

In science, conspiracists may suggest that a scientific theory can be disproven by a single perceived deficiency, even though such events are extremely rare. In addition, both disregarding the claims and attempting to address them will be interpreted as proof of a conspiracy.^[29] Other conspiracist arguments may not be scientific; for example, in response to the IPCC Second Assessment Report in 1996, much of the opposition centered on promoting a procedural objection to the report's creation. Specifically, it was claimed that part of the procedure reflected a conspiracy to silence dissenters, which served as motivation for opponents of the report and successfully redirected a significant amount of the public discussion away from the science.^[29]

Consequences

Third Reich Nazi anti-Semitic propaganda poster entitled Das jüdische Komplott ("The Jewish Conspiracy")

Historically, conspiracy theories have been closely linked to prejudice, witch hunts, wars, and genocides.^[28][29] They are often strongly believed by the perpetrators of terrorist attacks, and were used as justification by Timothy McVeigh, Anders Breivik and Brenton Tarrant, as well as by governments such as Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union.^[28] AIDS denialism by the government of South Africa, motivated by conspiracy theories, caused an estimated 330,000 deaths from AIDS,^[33][34][35] while belief in conspiracy theories about genetically modified foods led the government of Zambia to reject food aid during a famine,^[29] at a time when 3 million people in the country were suffering from hunger.^[39]

Conspiracy theories are a significant obstacle to improvements in public health.^[29][40] People who believe in health-related conspiracy theories are less likely to follow medical advice, and more likely to use alternative medicine instead.^[28] Conspiratorial anti-vaccination beliefs, such as conspiracy theories about pharmaceutical companies, can result in reduced vaccination rates and have been linked to outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases.^{[33][29][41][40]} Health-related conspiracy theories often inspire resistance to water fluoridation, and contributed to the impact of the Lancet MMR autism fraud.^[29][40]

Conspiracy theories are a fundamental component of a wide range of radicalized and extremist groups, where they may play an important role in reinforcing the ideology and psychology of their members as well as further radicalizing their beliefs.^[28][43] These conspiracy theories often share common themes, even among groups that would otherwise be fundamentally opposed, such as the antisemitic conspiracy theories found among political extremists on both the far right and far left.^[28] More generally, belief in conspiracy theories is associated with holding extreme and uncompromising viewpoints, and may help people in maintaining those viewpoints.^[42] While conspiracy theories are not always present in extremist groups, and do not always lead to violence when they are, they can make the group more extreme, provide an enemy to direct hatred towards, and isolate members from the rest of society. Conspiracy theories are most likely to inspire violence when they call for urgent action, appeal to prejudices, or demonize and scapegoat enemies.^[43]

Conspiracy theorizing in the workplace can also have economic consequences. For example, it leads to lower job satisfaction and lower commitment, resulting in workers being more likely to leave their jobs.^[28] Comparisons have also been made with the effects of workplace rumors, which share some characteristics with conspiracy theories and result in both decreased productivity and increased stress. Subsequent effects on managers include reduced profits, reduced trust from employees, and damage to the company's image.^[28][93]

Conspiracy theories can divert attention from important social, political, and scientific issues.^[94][95] In addition, they have been used to discredit scientific evidence to the general public or in a legal context. Conspiratorial strategies also share characteristics with those used by lawyers who are attempting to discredit expert testimony, such as claiming that the experts have ulterior motives in testifying, or attempting to find someone who will provide statements to imply that expert opinion is more divided than it actually is.^[29]

It is possible that conspiracy theories may also produce some compensatory benefits to society in certain situations. For example, they may help people identify governmental deceptions, particularly in repressive societies, and encourage government transparency.^[49][94] However, real conspiracies are normally revealed by people working within the system, such as whistleblowers and journalists, and most of the effort spent by conspiracy theorists is inherently misdirected.^[43] The most dangerous conspiracy theories are likely to be those that incite violence, scapegoat disadvantaged groups, or spread misinformation about important societal issues.^[96]

Interventions

See also: Misinformation § Countering misinformation

Target audience

Strategies to address conspiracy theories have been divided into two categories based on whether the target audience is the conspiracy theorists or the general public.^[51][49] These strategies have been described as reducing either the supply or the demand for conspiracy theories.^[49] Both approaches can be used at the same time, although there may be issues of limited resources, or if arguments are used which may appeal to one audience at the expense of the other.^[49]

General public

People who feel empowered are more resistant to conspiracy theories. Methods to promote empowerment include encouraging people to use analytical thinking, priming people to think of situations where they are in control, and ensuring that decisions by society and government are seen to follow procedural fairness (the use of fair decision-making procedures).^[51]

Methods of refutation which have shown effectiveness in various circumstances include: providing facts that demonstrate the conspiracy theory is false, attempting to discredit the source, explaining how the logic is invalid or misleading, and providing links to fact-checking websites.^[51] It can also be effective to use these strategies in advance, informing people that they could encounter misleading information in the future, and why the information should be rejected (also called inoculation or prebunking).^[51][97][98] While it has been suggested that discussing conspiracy theories can raise their profile and make them seem more legitimate to the public, the discussion can put people on guard instead as long as it is sufficiently persuasive.^[9]

Other approaches to reduce the appeal of conspiracy theories in general among the public may be based in the emotional and social nature of conspiratorial beliefs. For example, interventions that promote analytical thinking in the general public are likely to be effective. Another approach is to intervene in ways that decrease negative emotions, and specifically to improve feelings of personal hope and empowerment.^[48]

Conspiracy theorists

It is much more difficult to convince people who already believe in conspiracy theories.^[49][51] Conspiracist belief systems are not based on external evidence, but instead use circular logic where every belief is supported by other conspiracist beliefs.^[51] In addition, conspiracy theories have a "self-sealing" nature, in which the types of arguments used to support them make them resistant to questioning from others.^[49]

Characteristics of successful strategies for reaching conspiracy theorists have been divided into several broad categories: 1) Arguments can be presented by "trusted messengers", such as people who were formerly members of an extremist group. 2) Since conspiracy theorists think of themselves as people who value critical thinking, this can be affirmed and then redirected to encourage being more critical when analyzing the conspiracy theory. 3) Approaches demonstrate empathy, and are based on building understanding together, which is supported by modeling open-mindedness in order to encourage the conspiracy theorists to do likewise. 4) The conspiracy theories are not attacked with ridicule or aggressive deconstruction, and interactions are not treated like an argument to be won; this approach can work with the general public, but among conspiracy theorists it may simply be rejected.^[51]

Interventions that reduce feelings of uncertainty, anxiety, or powerlessness result in a reduction in conspiracy beliefs.^[42] Other possible strategies to mitigate the effect of conspiracy theories include education, media literacy, and increasing governmental openness and transparency.^[97] Due to the relationship between conspiracy theories and political extremism, the academic literature on deradicalization is also important.^[51]

One approach describes conspiracy theories as resulting from a "crippled epistemology", in which a person encounters or accepts very few relevant sources of information.^[49][99] A conspiracy theory is more likely to appear justified to people with a limited "informational environment" who only encounter misleading information. These people may be "epistemologically isolated" in self-enclosed networks. From the perspective of people within these networks, disconnected from the information available to the rest of society, believing in conspiracy theories may appear to be justified.^[49][99] In these cases, the solution would be to break the group's informational isolation.^[49]

Reducing transmission

Public exposure to conspiracy theories can be reduced by interventions that reduce their ability to spread, such as by encouraging people to reflect before sharing a news story.^[51] Researchers Carlos Diaz Ruiz and Tomas Nilsson have proposed technical and rhetorical interventions to counter the spread of conspiracy theories on social media.^[100]

Interventions to counter the spread of conspiracy theories on social media^[100]

Type of intervention	Intervention
Technical	Expose sources that insert and circulate conspiracy theories on social media (flagging).
	Diminish the source's capacity to monetize conspiracies (demonetization).
	Slow down the circulation of conspiracy theories (algorithm)
Rhetorical	Issue authoritative corrections (fact-checking).
	Authority-based corrections and fact-checking may backfire because personal worldviews cannot be proved wrong.
	Enlist spokespeople that can be perceived as allies and insiders.
	Rebuttals must spring from an epistemology that participants are already familiar with.
	Give believers of conspiracies an "exit ramp" to dis-invest themselves without facing ridicule.

Government policies

The primary defense against conspiracy theories is to maintain an open society, in which many sources of reliable information are available, and government sources are known to be credible rather than propaganda. Additionally, independent nongovernmental organizations are able to correct misinformation without requiring people to trust the government.^[49] The absence of civil rights and civil liberties reduces the number of information sources available to the population, which may lead people to support conspiracy theories.^[49] Since the credibility of conspiracy theories can be increased if governments act dishonestly or otherwise engage in objectionable actions, avoiding such actions is also a relevant strategy.^[97]

Joseph Pierre has said that mistrust in authoritative institutions is the core component underlying many conspiracy theories and that this mistrust creates an epistemic vacuum and makes individuals searching for answers vulnerable to misinformation. Therefore, one possible solution is offering consumers a seat at the table to mend their mistrust in institutions.^[101] Regarding the challenges of this approach, Pierre has said, "The challenge with acknowledging areas of uncertainty within a public sphere is that doing so can be weaponized to reinforce a post-truth view of the world in which everything is debatable, and any counter-position is just as valid. Although I like to think of myself as a middle of the road kind of individual, it is important to keep in mind that the truth does not always lie in the middle of a debate, whether we are talking about climate change, vaccines, or antipsychotic medications."^[102]

Researchers have recommended that public policies should take into account the possibility of conspiracy theories relating to any policy or policy area, and prepare to combat them in advance.^[97][9] Conspiracy theories have suddenly arisen in the context of policy issues as disparate as land-use laws and bicycle-sharing programs.^[97] In the case of public communications by government officials, factors that improve the effectiveness of communication include using clear and simple messages, and using messengers which are trusted by the target population. Government information about conspiracy theories is more likely to be believed if the messenger is perceived as being part of someone's in-group. Official representatives may be more effective if they share characteristics with the target groups, such as ethnicity.^[97]

In addition, when the government communicates with citizens to combat conspiracy theories, online methods are more efficient compared to other methods such as print publications. This also promotes transparency, can improve a message's perceived trustworthiness, and is more effective at reaching underrepresented demographics. However, as of 2019^[update], many governmental websites do not take full advantage of the available information-sharing opportunities. Similarly, social media accounts need to be used effectively in order to achieve meaningful communication with the public, such as by responding to requests that citizens send to those accounts. Other steps include adapting messages to the communication styles used on the social media platform in question, and promoting a culture of openness. Since mixed messaging can support conspiracy theories, it is also important to avoid conflicting accounts, such as by ensuring the accuracy of messages on the social media accounts of individual members of the organization.^[97]

Public health campaigns

Successful methods for dispelling conspiracy theories have been studied in the context of public health campaigns. A key characteristic of communication strategies to address medical conspiracy theories is the use of techniques that rely less on emotional appeals. It is more effective to use methods that encourage people to process information rationally. The use of visual aids is also an essential part of these strategies. Since conspiracy theories are based on intuitive thinking, and visual information processing relies on intuition, visual aids are able to compete directly for the public's attention.^[9]

In public health campaigns, information retention by the public is highest for loss-framed messages that include more extreme outcomes. However, excessively appealing to catastrophic scenarios (e.g. low vaccination rates causing an epidemic) may provoke anxiety, which is associated with conspiracism and could increase belief in conspiracy theories instead. Scare tactics have sometimes had mixed results, but are generally considered ineffective. An example of this is the use of images that showcase disturbing health outcomes, such as the impact of smoking on dental health. One possible explanation is that information processed via the fear response is typically not evaluated rationally, which may prevent the message from being linked to the desired behaviors.^[9]

A particularly important technique is the use of focus groups to understand exactly what people believe, and the reasons they give for those beliefs. This allows messaging to focus on the specific concerns that people identify, and on topics that are easily misinterpreted by the public, since these are factors which conspiracy theories can take advantage of. In addition, discussions with focus groups and observations of the group dynamics can indicate which anti-conspiracist ideas are most likely to spread.^[9]

Interventions that address medical conspiracy theories by reducing powerlessness include emphasizing the principle of informed consent, giving patients all the relevant information without imposing decisions on them, to ensure that they have a sense of control. Improving access to healthcare also reduces medical conspiracism. However, doing so by political efforts can also fuel additional conspiracy theories, which occurred with the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) in the United States. Another successful strategy is to require people to watch a short video when they fulfil requirements such as registration for school or a drivers' license, which has been demonstrated to improve vaccination rates and signups for organ donation.^[9]

Another approach is based on viewing conspiracy theories as narratives which express personal and cultural values, making them less susceptible to straightforward factual corrections, and more effectively addressed by counter-narratives.^[98][103] Counter-narratives can be more engaging and memorable than simple corrections, and can be adapted to the specific values held by individuals and cultures. These narratives may depict personal experiences, or alternatively they can be cultural narratives. In the context of vaccination, examples of cultural narratives include stories about scientific breakthroughs, about the world before vaccinations, or about heroic and altruistic researchers. The themes to be addressed would be those that could be exploited by conspiracy theories to increase vaccine hesitancy, such as perceptions of vaccine risk, lack of patient empowerment, and lack of trust in medical authorities.^[98]

Backfire effects

It has been suggested that directly countering misinformation can be counterproductive. For example, since conspiracy theories can reinterpret disconfirming information as part of their narrative, refuting a claim can result in accidentally reinforcing it,^[63][104] which is referred to as a "backfire effect".^[105] In addition, publishing criticism of conspiracy theories can result in legitimizing them.^[94] In this context, possible interventions include carefully selecting which conspiracy theories to refute, requesting additional analyses from independent observers, and introducing cognitive diversity into conspiratorial communities by undermining their poor epistemology.^[94] Any legitimization effect might also be reduced by responding to more conspiracy theories rather than fewer.^[49]

There are psychological mechanisms by which backfire effects could potentially occur, but the evidence on this topic is mixed, and backfire effects are very rare in practice.^{[98][105][106]} A 2020 review of the scientific literature on backfire effects found that there have been widespread failures to replicate their existence, even under conditions that would be theoretically favorable to observing them.^[105] Due to the lack of reproducibility, as of 2020^[update] most researchers believe that backfire effects are either unlikely to occur on the broader population level, or they only occur in very specific circumstances, or they do not exist.^[105] Brendan Nyhan, one of the researchers who initially proposed the occurrence of backfire effects, wrote in 2021 that the persistence of misinformation is most likely due to other factors.^[106]

In general, people do reject conspiracy theories when they learn about their contradictions and lack of evidence.^[9] For most people, corrections and fact-checking are very unlikely to have a negative impact, and there is no specific group of people in which backfire effects have been consistently observed.^[105] Presenting people with factual corrections, or highlighting the logical contradictions in conspiracy theories, has been demonstrated to have a positive effect in many circumstances.^[48][104] For example, this has been studied in the case of informing believers in 9/11 conspiracy theories about statements by actual experts and witnesses.^[48] One possibility is that criticism is most likely to backfire if it challenges someone's worldview or identity. This suggests that an effective approach may be to provide criticism while avoiding such challenges.^[104]

Psychology

The widespread belief in conspiracy theories has become a topic of interest for sociologists, psychologists, and experts in folklore since at least the 1960s, when a number of conspiracy theories arose regarding the assassination of U.S. President John F. Kennedy. Sociologist Türkay Salim Nefes underlines the political nature of conspiracy theories. He suggests that one of the most important characteristics of these accounts is their attempt to unveil the "real but hidden" power relations in social groups.^[107][108] The term "conspiracism" was popularized by academic Frank P. Mintz in the 1980s. According to Mintz, conspiracism denotes "belief in the primacy of conspiracies in the unfolding of history":^[109]: 4

Conspiracism serves the needs of diverse political and social groups in America and elsewhere. It identifies elites, blames them for economic and social catastrophes, and assumes that things will be better once popular action can remove them from positions of power. As such, conspiracy theories do not typify a particular epoch or ideology.^[109]: 199

Research suggests, on a psychological level, conspiracist ideation—belief in conspiracy theories—can be harmful or pathological,^[20][21] and is highly correlated with psychological projection, as well as with paranoia, which is predicted by the degree of a person's Machiavellianism.^[110] The propensity to believe in conspiracy theories is strongly associated with the mental health disorder of schizotypy.^{[111][112][113][114][115]} Conspiracy theories once limited to fringe audiences have become commonplace in mass media, emerging as a cultural phenomenon of the late 20th and early 21st centuries.^{[44][45][46][47]} Exposure to conspiracy theories in news media and popular entertainment increases receptiveness to conspiratorial ideas, and has also increased the social acceptability of fringe beliefs.^[28][116]

Conspiracy theories often make use of complicated and detailed arguments, including ones which appear to be analytical or scientific. However, belief in conspiracy theories is primarily driven by emotion.^[48] One of the most widely confirmed facts about conspiracy theories is that belief in a single conspiracy theory tends be correlated with belief in other conspiracy theories.^[33][117] This even applies when the conspiracy theories directly contradict each other, e.g. believing that Osama bin Laden was already dead before his compound in Pakistan was attacked makes the same person more likely to believe that he is still alive. One conclusion from this finding is that the content of a conspiracist belief is less important than the idea of a coverup by the authorities.^{[33][95][118]} Analytical thinking aids in reducing belief in conspiracy theories, in part because it emphasizes rational and critical cognition.^[42]

Some psychological scientists assert that explanations related to conspiracy theories can be, and often are "internally consistent" with strong beliefs that had previously been held prior to the event that sparked the conspiracy.^[42] People who believe in conspiracy theories tend to believe in other unsubstantiated claims – including pseudoscience and paranormal phenomena.^[119]

Attractions

Psychological motives for believing in conspiracy theories can be categorized as epistemic, existential, or social. These motives are particularly acute in vulnerable and disadvantaged populations. However, it does not appear that the beliefs help to address these motives; in fact, they may be self-defeating, acting to make the situation worse instead.^[42][104] For example, while conspiratorial beliefs can result from a perceived sense of powerlessness, exposure to conspiracy theories immediately suppresses personal feelings of autonomy and control. Furthermore, they also make people less likely to take actions that could improve their circumstances.^[42][104]

This is additionally supported by the fact that conspiracy theories have a number of disadvantageous attributes.^[42] For example, they promote a negative and distrustful view of other people and groups, who are allegedly acting based on antisocial and cynical motivations. This is expected to lead to increased alienation and anomie, and reduced social capital. Similarly, they depict the public as ignorant and powerless against the alleged conspirators, with important aspects of society determined by malevolent forces, a viewpoint which is likely to be disempowering.^[42]

Each person may endorse conspiracy theories for one of many different reasons.^[120] The most consistently demonstrated characteristics of people who find conspiracy theories appealing are a feeling of alienation, unhappiness or dissatisfaction with their situation, an unconventional worldview, and a feeling of disempowerment.^[120] While various aspects of personality affect susceptibility to conspiracy theories, none of the Big Five personality traits are associated with conspiracy beliefs.^[120]

The political scientist Michael Barkun, discussing the usage of "conspiracy theory" in contemporary American culture, holds that this term is used for a belief that explains an event as the result of a secret plot by exceptionally powerful and cunning conspirators to achieve a malevolent end.^[121][122] According to Barkun, the appeal of conspiracism is threefold:

• First, conspiracy theories claim to explain what institutional analysis cannot. They appear to make sense out of a world that is otherwise confusing.
• Second, they do so in an appealingly simple way, by dividing the world sharply between the forces of light, and the forces of darkness. They trace all evil back to a single source, the conspirators and their agents.
• Third, conspiracy theories are often presented as special, secret knowledge unknown or unappreciated by others. For conspiracy theorists, the masses are a brainwashed herd, while the conspiracy theorists in the know can congratulate themselves on penetrating the plotters' deceptions.^[122]

This third point is supported by research of Roland Imhoff, professor of social psychology at the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz. The research suggests that the smaller the minority believing in a specific theory, the more attractive it is to conspiracy theorists.^[123] Humanistic psychologists argue that even if a posited cabal behind an alleged conspiracy is almost always perceived as hostile, there often remains an element of reassurance for theorists. This is because it is a consolation to imagine that difficulties in human affairs are created by humans, and remain within human control. If a cabal can be implicated, there may be a hope of breaking its power or of joining it. Belief in the power of a cabal is an implicit assertion of human dignity—an unconscious affirmation that man is responsible for his own destiny.^[124]

People formulate conspiracy theories to explain, for example, power relations in social groups and the perceived existence of evil forces.^{[c][122][107][108]} Proposed psychological origins of conspiracy theorising include projection; the personal need to explain "a significant event [with] a significant cause;" and the product of various kinds and stages of thought disorder, such as paranoid disposition, ranging in severity to diagnosable mental illnesses. Some people prefer socio-political explanations over the insecurity of encountering random, unpredictable, or otherwise inexplicable events.^{[125][126][127][128][129][130]} According to Berlet and Lyons, "Conspiracism is a particular narrative form of scapegoating that frames demonized enemies as part of a vast insidious plot against the common good, while it valorizes the scapegoater as a hero for sounding the alarm".^[131]

Causes

Some psychologists believe that a search for meaning is common in conspiracism. Once cognized, confirmation bias and avoidance of cognitive dissonance may reinforce the belief. In a context where a conspiracy theory has become embedded within a social group, communal reinforcement may also play a part.^[132]

Inquiry into possible motives behind the accepting of irrational conspiracy theories has linked^[133] these beliefs to distress resulting from an event that occurred, such as the events of 9/11. Additional research suggests that "delusional ideation" is the trait most likely to indicate a stronger belief in conspiracy theories.^[134] Research also shows an increased attachment to these irrational beliefs leads to a decreased desire for civic engagement.^[84] Belief in conspiracy theories is correlated with low intelligence, lower analytical thinking, anxiety disorders, paranoia, and authoritarian beliefs.^{[135][136][137]}

Professor Quassim Cassam argues that conspiracy theorists hold their beliefs due to flaws in their thinking and more precisely, their intellectual character. He cites philosopher Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski and her book Virtues of the Mind in outlining intellectual virtues (such as humility, caution and carefulness) and intellectual vices (such as gullibility, carelessness and closed-mindedness). Whereas intellectual virtues help in reaching sound examination, intellectual vices "impede effective and responsible inquiry", meaning that those who are prone to believing in conspiracy theories possess certain vices while lacking necessary virtues.^[138]

Some researchers have suggested that conspiracy theories could be partially caused by psychological mechanisms the human brain possesses for detecting dangerous coalitions. Such a mechanism could have been useful in the small-scale environment humanity evolved in but are mismatched in a modern, complex society and thus "misfire", perceiving conspiracies where none exist.^[139]

Projection

Some historians have argued that psychological projection is prevalent amongst conspiracy theorists. This projection, according to the argument, is manifested in the form of attribution of undesirable characteristics of the self to the conspirators. Historian Richard Hofstadter stated that:

This enemy seems on many counts a projection of the self; both the ideal and the unacceptable aspects of the self are attributed to him. A fundamental paradox of the paranoid style is the imitation of the enemy. The enemy, for example, may be the cosmopolitan intellectual, but the paranoid will outdo him in the apparatus of scholarship, even of pedantry. ... The Ku Klux Klan imitated Catholicism to the point of donning priestly vestments, developing an elaborate ritual and an equally elaborate hierarchy. The John Birch Society emulates Communist cells and quasi-secret operation through "front" groups, and preaches a ruthless prosecution of the ideological war along lines very similar to those it finds in the Communist enemy. Spokesmen of the various fundamentalist anti-Communist "crusades" openly express their admiration for the dedication, discipline, and strategic ingenuity the Communist cause calls forth.^[128]

Hofstadter also noted that "sexual freedom" is a vice frequently attributed to the conspiracist's target group, noting that "very often the fantasies of true believers reveal strong sadomasochistic outlets, vividly expressed, for example, in the delight of anti-Masons with the cruelty of Masonic punishments".^[128]

Physiology

Marcel Danesi suggests that people who believe conspiracy theories have difficulty rethinking situations. Exposure to those theories has caused neural pathways which are more rigid and less subject to change. Initial susceptibility to believing the lies, dehumanizing language, and metaphors of these theories leads to the acceptance of larger and more extensive theories because the hardened neural pathways are already present. Repetition of the "facts" of conspiracy theories and their connected lies simply reinforces the rigidity of those pathways. Thus, conspiracy theories and dehumanizing lies are not mere hyperbole, they can actually change the way people think:

Unfortunately, research into this brain wiring also shows that once people begin to believe lies, they are unlikely to change their minds even when confronted with evidence that contradicts their beliefs. It is a form of brainwashing. Once the brain has carved out a well-worn path of believing deceit, it is even harder to step out of that path — which is how fanatics are born. Instead, these people will seek out information that confirms their beliefs, avoid anything that is in conflict with them, or even turn the contrasting information on its head, so as to make it fit their beliefs.

People with strong convictions will have a hard time changing their minds, given how embedded a lie becomes in the mind. In fact, there are scientists and scholars still studying the best tools and tricks to combat lies with some combination of brain training and linguistic awareness.^[140]

Sociology

In addition to psychological factors such as conspiracist ideation, sociological factors also help account for who believes in which conspiracy theories. Such theories tend to get more traction among election losers in society, for example, and the emphasis of conspiracy theories by elites and leaders tends to increase belief among followers who have higher levels of conspiracy thinking.^[141] Christopher Hitchens described conspiracy theories as the "exhaust fumes of democracy":^[129] the unavoidable result of a large amount of information circulating among a large number of people.

Conspiracy theories may be emotionally satisfying, by assigning blame to a group to which the theorist does not belong and so absolving the theorist of moral or political responsibility in society.^[142] Likewise, Roger Cohen writing for The New York Times has said that, "captive minds; ... resort to conspiracy theory because it is the ultimate refuge of the powerless. If you cannot change your own life, it must be that some greater force controls the world."^[130]

Sociological historian Holger Herwig found in studying German explanations for the origins of World War I, "Those events that are most important are hardest to understand because they attract the greatest attention from myth makers and charlatans."^[143] Justin Fox of Time magazine argues that Wall Street traders are among the most conspiracy-minded group of people, and ascribes this to the reality of some financial market conspiracies, and to the ability of conspiracy theories to provide necessary orientation in the market's day-to-day movements.^[125]

Influence of critical theory

Bruno Latour notes that the language and intellectual tactics of critical theory have been appropriated by those he describes as conspiracy theorists, including climate-change denialists and the 9/11 Truth movement: "Maybe I am taking conspiracy theories too seriously, but I am worried to detect, in those mad mixtures of knee-jerk disbelief, punctilious demands for proofs, and free use of powerful explanation from the social neverland, many of the weapons of social critique."^[144]

Fusion paranoia

Michael Kelly, a Washington Post journalist and critic of anti-war movements on both the left and right, coined the term "fusion paranoia" to refer to a political convergence of left-wing and right-wing activists around anti-war issues and civil liberties, which he said were motivated by a shared belief in conspiracism or shared anti-government views.^[145]

Barkun has adopted this term to refer to how the synthesis of paranoid conspiracy theories, which were once limited to American fringe audiences, has given them mass appeal and enabled them to become commonplace in mass media,^[146] thereby inaugurating an unrivaled period of people actively preparing for apocalyptic or millenarian scenarios in the United States of the late 20th and early 21st centuries.^[147] Barkun notes the occurrence of lone-wolf conflicts with law enforcement acting as proxy for threatening the established political powers.^[148]

Viability

As evidence that undermines an alleged conspiracy grows, the number of alleged conspirators also grows in the minds of conspiracy theorists. This is because of an assumption that the alleged conspirators often have competing interests. For example, if Republican President George W. Bush is allegedly responsible for the 9/11 terrorist attacks, and the Democratic party did not pursue exposing this alleged plot, that must mean that both the Democratic and Republican parties are conspirators in the alleged plot. It also assumes that the alleged conspirators are so competent that they can fool the entire world, but so incompetent that even the unskilled conspiracy theorists can find mistakes they make that prove the fraud. At some point, the number of alleged conspirators, combined with the contradictions within the alleged conspirators' interests and competence, becomes so great that maintaining the theory becomes an obvious exercise in absurdity.^[149]

The physicist David Robert Grimes estimated the time it would take for a conspiracy to be exposed based on the number of people involved.^[150][151] His calculations used data from the PRISM surveillance program, the Tuskegee syphilis experiment, and the FBI forensic scandal. Grimes estimated that:

• A Moon landing hoax would require the involvement of 411,000 people and would be exposed within 3.68 years;
• Climate-change fraud would require a minimum of 29,083 people (published climate scientists only) and would be exposed within 26.77 years, or up to 405,000 people, in which case it would be exposed within 3.70 years;
• A vaccination conspiracy would require a minimum of 22,000 people (without drug companies) and would be exposed within at least 3.15 years and at most 34.78 years depending on the number involved;
• A conspiracy to suppress a cure for cancer would require 714,000 people and would be exposed within 3.17 years.

Grimes's study did not consider exposure by sources outside of the alleged conspiracy. It only considered exposure from within the alleged conspiracy through whistleblowers or through incompetence.^[152] Subsequent comments on the PubPeer website^[153] point out that these calculations must exclude successful conspiracies since, by definition, we don't know about them, and are wrong by an order of magnitude about Bletchley Park, which remained a secret far longer than Grimes' calculations predicted.

Terminology

The term "truth seeker" is adopted by some conspiracy theorists when describing themselves on social media.^[154] Conspiracy theorists are often referred to derogatorily as "cookers" in Australia.^[155] The term "cooker" is also loosely associated with the far right.^[156][157]

Politics

A 2008 poll found that majorities in only 9 of 17 countries believed that al-Qaeda carried out the 9/11 attacks.^[158]

The philosopher Karl Popper described the central problem of conspiracy theories as a form of fundamental attribution error, where every event is generally perceived as being intentional and planned, greatly underestimating the effects of randomness and unintended consequences.^[95] In his book The Open Society and Its Enemies, he used the term "the conspiracy theory of society" to denote the idea that social phenomena such as "war, unemployment, poverty, shortages ... [are] the result of direct design by some powerful individuals and groups".^[159] Popper argued that totalitarianism was founded on conspiracy theories which drew on imaginary plots which were driven by paranoid scenarios predicated on tribalism, chauvinism, or racism. He also noted that conspirators very rarely achieved their goal.^[160]

Historically, real conspiracies have usually had little effect on history and have had unforeseen consequences for the conspirators, in contrast to conspiracy theories which often posit grand, sinister organizations, or world-changing events, the evidence for which has been erased or obscured.^[161][162] As described by Bruce Cumings, history is instead "moved by the broad forces and large structures of human collectivities".^[161]

Arab world

Main article: Conspiracy theories in the Arab world

Conspiracy theories are a prevalent feature of Arab culture and politics.^[163] Variants include conspiracies involving colonialism, Zionism, superpowers, oil, and the war on terrorism, which is often referred to in Arab media as a "war against Islam".^[163] For example, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, an infamous hoax document purporting to be a Jewish plan for world domination, is commonly read and promoted in the Muslim world.^{[164][165][166]} Roger Cohen has suggested that the popularity of conspiracy theories in the Arab world is "the ultimate refuge of the powerless".^[130] Al-Mumin Said has noted the danger of such theories, for they "keep us not only from the truth but also from confronting our faults and problems".^[167] Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri used conspiracy theories about the United States to gain support for al-Qaeda in the Arab world, and as rhetoric to distinguish themselves from similar groups, although they may not have believed the conspiratorial claims themselves.^[168]

Turkey

Main article: Conspiracy theories in Turkey

Conspiracy theories are a prevalent feature of culture and politics in Turkey. Conspiracism is an important phenomenon in understanding Turkish politics.^[169] This is explained by a desire to "make up for our lost Ottoman grandeur",^[169] the humiliation of perceiving Turkey as part of "the malfunctioning half" of the world,^[170] and a "low level of media literacy among the Turkish population."^[171]

There are a wide variety of conspiracy theories including the Judeo-Masonic conspiracy theory,^[172][173] the international Jewish conspiracy theory, and the war against Islam conspiracy theory. For example, Islamists, dissatisfied with the modernist and secularist reforms that took place throughout the history of the Ottoman Empire and the Turkish Republic, have put forward many conspiracy theories to defame the Treaty of Lausanne, an important peace treaty for the country, and the republic's founder Kemal Atatürk.^[174][175] Another example is the Sèvres syndrome, a reference to the Treaty of Sèvres of 1920, a popular belief in Turkey that dangerous internal and external enemies, especially the West, are "conspiring to weaken and carve up the Turkish Republic".^[176]

United States

Main article: Conspiracy theories in United States politics

The historian Richard Hofstadter addressed the role of paranoia and conspiracism throughout U.S. history in his 1964 essay "The Paranoid Style in American Politics". Bernard Bailyn's classic The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution (1967) notes that a similar phenomenon could be found in North America during the time preceding the American Revolution. Conspiracism labels people's attitudes as well as the type of conspiracy theories that are more global and historical in proportion.^[177]

Harry G. West and others have noted that while conspiracy theorists may often be dismissed as a fringe minority, certain evidence suggests that a wide range of the U.S. maintains a belief in conspiracy theories. West also compares those theories to hypernationalism and religious fundamentalism.^[178][179] Theologian Robert Jewett and philosopher John Shelton Lawrence attribute the enduring popularity of conspiracy theories in the U.S. to the Cold War, McCarthyism, and counterculture rejection of authority. They state that among both the left-wing and right-wing, there remains a willingness to use real events, such as Soviet plots, inconsistencies in the Warren Report, and the 9/11 attacks, to support the existence of unverified and ongoing large-scale conspiracies.^[180]

In his studies of "American political demonology", historian Michael Paul Rogin too analyzed this paranoid style of politics that has occurred throughout American history. Conspiracy theories frequently identify an imaginary subversive group that is supposedly attacking the nation and requires the government and allied forces to engage in harsh extra-legal repression of those threatening subversives. Rogin cites examples from the Red Scares of 1919, to McCarthy's anti-communist campaign in the 1950s and more recently fears of immigrant hordes invading the US. Unlike Hofstadter, Rogin saw these "countersubversive" fears as frequently coming from those in power and dominant groups, instead of from the dispossessed. Unlike Robert Jewett, Rogin blamed not the counterculture, but America's dominant culture of liberal individualism and the fears it stimulated to explain the periodic eruption of irrational conspiracy theories.^[181] The Watergate scandal has also been used to bestow legitimacy to other conspiracy theories, with Richard Nixon himself commenting that it served as a "Rorschach ink blot" which invited others to fill in the underlying pattern.^[87]

Historian Kathryn S. Olmsted cites three reasons why Americans are prone to believing in government conspiracies theories:

1. Genuine government overreach and secrecy during the Cold War, such as Watergate, the Tuskegee syphilis experiment, Project MKUltra, and the CIA's assassination attempts on Fidel Castro in collaboration with mobsters.
2. Precedent set by official government-sanctioned conspiracy theories for propaganda, such as claims of German infiltration of the U.S. during World War II or the debunked claim that Saddam Hussein played a role in the 9/11 attacks.
3. Distrust fostered by the government's spying on and harassment of dissenters, such as the Sedition Act of 1918, COINTELPRO, and as part of various Red Scares.^[182]

Alex Jones referenced numerous conspiracy theories for convincing his supporters to endorse Ron Paul over Mitt Romney in the 2012 Republican Party presidential primaries and Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton in the 2016 United States presidential election.^[183][184] Into the 2020s, the QAnon conspiracy theory alleges that Trump is fighting against a deep-state cabal of child sex-abusing and Satan-worshipping Democrats.^{[36][37][185][186][187][188]}

See also

• Big lie – Propaganda technique
• Brainwashing – Concept that the human mind can be altered or controlled
• Cherry picking – Fallacy of incomplete evidence
• Conspiracy fiction – Subgenre of thriller fiction
• Fake news – False or misleading information presented as real
• Fringe theory – Idea which departs from accepted scholarship in the field
• Furtive fallacy – Informal fallacy of emphasis
• Hanlon's razor – Adage to assume stupidity over malice
• Influencing machine – 1919 article in psychoanalysis
• List of conspiracy theories
• List of fallacies – List of faulty argument types
• List of topics characterized as pseudoscience
• Occam's razor – Philosophical problem-solving principle
• Philosophy of conspiracy theories – Branch of academic study
• Propaganda – Communication used to influence opinion
• Pseudohistory – Pseudoscholarship that attempts to distort historical record
• Pseudoscience – Unscientific claims wrongly presented as scientific
• Superstition – Belief or behavior that is considered irrational or supernatural

References

Informational notes

1. Birchall 2006: "[W]e can appreciate conspiracy theory as a unique form of popular knowledge or interpretation, and address what this might mean for any knowledge we produce about it or how we interpret it."^[85]: 66
2. Birchall 2006: "What we quickly discover ... is that it becomes impossible to map conspiracy theory and academic discourse onto a clear illegitimate/legitimate divide."^[85]: 72
3. Barkun 2003: "The essence of conspiracy beliefs lies in attempts to delineate and explain evil. At their broadest, conspiracy theories 'view history as controlled by massive, demonic forces.' ... For our purposes, a conspiracy belief is the belief that an organization made up of individuals or groups was or is acting covertly to achieve a malevolent end."^[121]

Citations

1. Barkun, Michael (2003). A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 3–4.
2. Issitt, Micah; Main, Carlyn (2014). Hidden Religion: The Greatest Mysteries and Symbols of the World's Religious Beliefs. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-61069-478-0.
3. Harambam, Jaron; Aupers, Stef (August 2021). "From the unbelievable to the undeniable: Epistemological pluralism, or how conspiracy theorists legitimate their extraordinary truth claims". European Journal of Cultural Studies. 24 (4). SAGE Publications: 990–1008. doi:10.1177/1367549419886045. hdl:11245.1/7716b88d-4e3f-49ee-8093-253ccb344090. ISSN 1460-3551.
4. Goertzel, Ted (December 1994). "Belief in conspiracy theories". Political Psychology. 15 (4). Wiley on behalf of the International Society of Political Psychology: 731–742. doi:10.2307/3791630. ISSN 1467-9221. JSTOR 3791630. explanations for important events that involve secret plots by powerful and malevolent groups
5. "conspiracy theory". Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) "the theory that an event or phenomenon occurs as a result of a conspiracy between interested parties; spec. a belief that some covert but influential agency (typically political in motivation and oppressive in intent) is responsible for an unexplained event"
6. Brotherton, Robert; French, Christopher C.; Pickering, Alan D. (2013). "Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale". Frontiers in Psychology. 4: 279. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279. ISSN 1664-1078. PMC 3659314. PMID 23734136. S2CID 16685781. A conspiracist belief can be described as 'the unnecessary assumption of conspiracy when other explanations are more probable'.
7. Additional sources:
   • Aaronovitch, David (2009). Voodoo Histories: The Role of the Conspiracy Theory in Shaping Modern History. Jonathan Cape. p. 253. ISBN 9780224074704. Retrieved 17 August 2019. It is a contention of this book that conspiracy theorists fail to apply the principle of Occam's razor to their arguments.
   • Brotherton, Robert; French, Christopher C. (2014). "Belief in Conspiracy Theories and Susceptibility to the Conjunction Fallacy". Applied Cognitive Psychology. 28 (2): 238–248. doi:10.1002/acp.2995. ISSN 0888-4080. A conspiracy theory can be defined as an unverified and relatively implausible allegation of conspiracy, claiming that significant events are the result of a secret plot carried out by a preternaturally sinister and powerful group of people.
   • Jonason, Peter Karl; March, Evita; Springer, Jordan (2019). "Belief in conspiracy theories: The predictive role of schizotypy, Machiavellianism, and primary psychopathy". PLOS ONE. 14 (12): e0225964. Bibcode:2019PLoSO..1425964M. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0225964. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 6890261. PMID 31794581. Conspiracy theories are a subset of false beliefs, and generally implicate a malevolent force (e.g., a government body or secret society) involved in orchestrating major events or providing misinformation regarding the details of events to an unwitting public, in part of a plot towards achieving a sinister goal.
   • Thresher-Andrews, Christopher (2013). "An introduction into the world of conspiracy" (PDF). PsyPAG Quarterly. 1 (88): 5–8. doi:10.53841/bpspag.2013.1.88.5. ISSN 1746-6016. S2CID 255932379. Conspiracy theories are unsubstantiated, less plausible alternatives to the mainstream explanation of the event; they assume everything is intended, with malignity. Crucially, they are also epistemically self-insulating in their construction and arguments.
8. Byford, Jovan (2011). Conspiracy theories : a critical introduction. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9780230349216. OCLC 802867724.
9. Andrade, Gabriel (April 2020). "Medical conspiracy theories: Cognitive science and implications for ethics" (PDF). Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 23 (3). Springer on behalf of the European Society for Philosophy of Medicine and Healthcare: 505–518. doi:10.1007/s11019-020-09951-6. ISSN 1572-8633. PMC 7161434. PMID 32301040. S2CID 215787658. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 May 2020. Retrieved 7 October 2021.
10. Barkun, Michael (October 2016). Campion-Vincent, Véronique; Renard, Jean-Bruno (eds.). "Conspiracy Theories as Stigmatized Knowledge". Diogenes. 62 (3–4: Conspiracy Theories Today). SAGE Publications on behalf of the International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies: 114–120. doi:10.1177/0392192116669288. ISSN 0392-1921. LCCN 55003452. S2CID 152217672.
11. Brotherton, Robert (2013). "Towards a definition of 'conspiracy theory'" (PDF). PsyPAG Quarterly. 1 (88): 9–14. doi:10.53841/bpspag.2013.1.88.9. S2CID 141788005. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 October 2013. A conspiracy theory is not merely one candidate explanation among other equally plausible alternatives. Rather, the label refers to a claim which runs counter to a more plausible and widely accepted account...[Conspiratorial beliefs are] invariably at odds with the mainstream consensus among scientists, historians, or other legitimate judges of the claim's veracity.
12. Douglas, Karen M.; Sutton, Robbie M. (January 2023). Fiske, Susan T. (ed.). "What Are Conspiracy Theories? A Definitional Approach to Their Correlates, Consequences, and Communication". Annual Review of Psychology. 74. Annual Reviews: 271–298. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-032420-031329. ISSN 1545-2085. OCLC 909903176. PMID 36170672. S2CID 252597317.
13. Douglas, Karen M.; Sutton, Robbie M. (12 April 2011). "Does it take one to know one? Endorsement of conspiracy theories is influenced by personal willingness to conspire" (PDF). British Journal of Social Psychology. 10 (3). Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the British Psychological Society: 544–552. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02018.x. ISSN 2044-8309. LCCN 81642357. OCLC 475047529. PMID 21486312. S2CID 7318352. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 November 2018. Retrieved 8 May 2024.
14. Keeley, Brian L. (March 1999). "Of Conspiracy Theories". The Journal of Philosophy. 96 (3): 109–126. doi:10.2307/2564659. JSTOR 2564659.
15. Lewandowsky, Stephan; Gignac, Gilles E.; Oberauer, Klaus (2 October 2013). Denson, Tom (ed.). "The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science". PLOS ONE. 8 (10): e75637. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...875637L. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075637. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3788812. PMID 24098391.
16. Barkun, Michael (2011). Chasing Phantoms: Reality, Imagination, and Homeland Security Since 9/11. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. p. 10.
17. Swami, Viren (6 August 2012). "Social Psychological Origins of Conspiracy Theories: The Case of the Jewish Conspiracy Theory in Malaysia". Frontiers in Psychology. 3. London, UK: 280. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00280. ISSN 1664-1078. PMC 3412387. PMID 22888323.
18. Radnitz, Scott (2021), "Citizen Cynics: How People Talk and Think about Conspiracy", Revealing Schemes, University of Washington: Oxford University Press, pp. 153–172, doi:10.1093/oso/9780197573532.003.0009, ISBN 978-0-19-757353-2, retrieved 17 May 2022
19. Jolley, Daniel; Douglas, Karen M. (20 February 2014). "The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions". PLOS ONE. 9 (2). University of Kent: e89177. Bibcode:2014PLoSO...989177J. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089177. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3930676. PMID 24586574.
20. Freeman, Daniel; Bentall, Richard P. (29 March 2017). "The concomitants of conspiracy concerns". Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 52 (5): 595–604. doi:10.1007/s00127-017-1354-4. ISSN 0933-7954. PMC 5423964. PMID 28352955.
21. Barron, David; Morgan, Kevin; Towell, Tony; Altemeyer, Boris; Swami, Viren (November 2014). "Associations between schizotypy and belief in conspiracist ideation" (PDF). Personality and Individual Differences. 70: 156–159. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.040.
22. Douglas, Karen M.; Sutton, Robbie M. (12 April 2011). "Does it take one to know one? Endorsement of conspiracy theories is influenced by personal willingness to conspire" (PDF). British Journal of Social Psychology. 10 (3): 544–552. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02018.x. PMID 21486312. S2CID 7318352. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 November 2018. Retrieved 28 December 2018.
23. Brüne, M.; Basilowski, M.; Bömmer, I.; Juckel, G.; Assion, H. J. (2010). "Machiavellianism and executive functioning in patients with delusional disorder". Psychological Reports. 106 (1): 205–215. doi:10.2466/PR0.106.1.205-215. PMID 20402445.
24. Dean, Signe (23 October 2017). "Conspiracy Theorists Really Do See The World Differently, New Study Shows". Science Alert. Retrieved 17 June 2020.
25. Sloat, Sarah (17 October 2017). "Conspiracy Theorists Have a Fundamental Cognitive Problem, Say Scientists". Inverse. Retrieved 17 June 2020.
26. Hughes, Sara; Machan, Laura (2021). "It's a conspiracy: Covid-19 conspiracies link to psychopathy, Machiavellianism and collective narcissism". Personality and Individual Differences. 171: 110559. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110559. PMC 8035125. PMID 33867616.
27. van Prooijen, Jan-Willem; Douglas, Karen M (2017). "Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations". Memory Studies. 10 (3): 323–333. doi:10.1177/1750698017701615. ISSN 1750-6980. PMC 5646574. PMID 29081831.
28. Douglas, Karen M.; Uscinski, Joseph E.; Sutton, Robbie M.; Cichocka, Aleksandra; Nefes, Turkay; Ang, Chee Siang; Deravi, Farzin (2019). "Understanding Conspiracy Theories". Political Psychology. 40 (S1): 3–35. doi:10.1111/pops.12568. ISSN 0162-895X.
29. Goertzel, Ted (2010). "Conspiracy theories in science". EMBO Reports. 11 (7): 493–499. doi:10.1038/embor.2010.84. ISSN 1469-221X. PMC 2897118. PMID 20539311.
30. Frankfurter, David (February 2021). Copp, Paul; Wedemeyer, Christian K. (eds.). "Religion in the Mirror of the Other: The Discursive Value of Cult-Atrocity Stories in Mediterranean Antiquity". History of Religions. 60 (3). University of Chicago Press for the University of Chicago Divinity School: 188–208. doi:10.1086/711943. ISSN 0018-2710. JSTOR 00182710. LCCN 64001081. OCLC 299661763. S2CID 233429880.
31. Nefes, Turkay (2018). "Framing of a Conspiracy Theory: The Efendi Series". In Asprem, Egil; Dyrendal, Asbjørn; Robertson, David G. (eds.). Handbook of Conspiracy Theory and Contemporary Religion. Brill Handbooks on Contemporary Religion. Vol. 17. Leiden: Brill Publishers. pp. 407–422. doi:10.1163/9789004382022_020. ISBN 978-90-04-38150-6. ISSN 1874-6691. S2CID 158560266. Conspiracy theories often function as popular conduits of ethno-religious hatred and conflict.
32. Göknar, Erdağ (2019). "Conspiracy Theory in Turkey: Politics and Protest in the Age of "Post-Truth" by Julian de Medeiros (review)". The Middle East Journal. 73 (2): 336–337. ISSN 1940-3461.
33. Thresher-Andrews, Christopher (2013). "An introduction into the world of conspiracy" (PDF). PsyPAG Quarterly. 1 (88): 5–8. doi:10.53841/bpspag.2013.1.88.5. S2CID 255932379.
34. Simelela, Nono; Venter, W. D. Francois; Pillay, Yogan; Barron, Peter (2015). "A Political and Social History of HIV in South Africa". Current HIV/AIDS Reports. 12 (2): 256–261. doi:10.1007/s11904-015-0259-7. ISSN 1548-3568. PMID 25929959. S2CID 23483038.
35. Burton, Rosie; Giddy, Janet; Stinson, Kathryn (2015). "Prevention of mother-to-child transmission in South Africa: an ever-changing landscape". Obstetric Medicine. 8 (1): 5–12. doi:10.1177/1753495X15570994. ISSN 1753-495X. PMC 4934997. PMID 27512452.
36. Tollefson, Jeff (4 February 2021). "Tracking QAnon: how Trump turned conspiracy-theory research upside down" (PDF). Nature. Vol. 590. Nature Research. pp. 192–193. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-00257-y. ISSN 1476-4687. LCCN 12037118. PMID 33542489. S2CID 231818589. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 April 2021. Retrieved 7 October 2021.
37. Crossley, James (September 2021). "The Apocalypse and Political Discourse in an Age of COVID". Journal for the Study of the New Testament. 44 (1). SAGE Publications: 93–111. doi:10.1177/0142064X211025464. ISSN 1745-5294. S2CID 237329082.
38. "QAnon reshaped Trump's party and radicalized believers. The Capitol siege may just be the start". The Washington Post. 13 January 2021.
39. Dominique Brossard; James Shanahan; T. Clint Nesbitt (2007). The Media, the Public and Agricultural Biotechnology. CABI. pp. 343, 353. ISBN 978-1-84593-204-6.
40. Glick, Michael; Booth, H. Austin (2014). "Conspiracy ideation". The Journal of the American Dental Association. 145 (8): 798–799. doi:10.1016/S0002-8177(14)60181-1. ISSN 0002-8177. PMID 25082925.
41. Prematunge, Chatura; Corace, Kimberly; McCarthy, Anne; Nair, Rama C.; Pugsley, Renee; Garber, Gary (2012). "Factors influencing pandemic influenza vaccination of healthcare workers—A systematic review". Vaccine. 30 (32): 4733–4743. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.05.018. ISSN 0264-410X. PMID 22643216.
42. Douglas, Karen M.; Sutton, Robbie M.; Cichocka, Aleksandra (1 December 2017). "The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories". Current Directions in Psychological Science. 26 (6): 538–542. doi:10.1177/0963721417718261. ISSN 0963-7214. PMC 5724570. PMID 29276345.
43. Robert Brotherton (19 November 2015). "Chapter 2". Suspicious Minds: Why We Believe Conspiracy Theories. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4729-1564-1.
44. Barkun 2003, p. 58.
45. Camp, Gregory S. (1997). Selling Fear: Conspiracy Theories and End-Times Paranoia. Commish Walsh. ASIN B000J0N8NC.
46. Goldberg, Robert Alan (2001). Enemies Within: The Culture of Conspiracy in Modern America. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-09000-0. Archived from the original on 17 December 2019. Retrieved 6 August 2019.
47. Fenster, Mark (2008). Conspiracy Theories: Secrecy and Power in American Culture. University of Minnesota Press; 2nd edition. ISBN 978-0-8166-5494-9.
48. van Prooijen, Jan-Willem; Douglas, Karen M. (2018). "Belief in conspiracy theories: Basic principles of an emerging research domain". European Journal of Social Psychology. 48 (7): 897–908. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2530. ISSN 0046-2772. PMC 6282974. PMID 30555188.
49. Sunstein, Cass R.; Vermeule, Adrian (2009). "Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures". Journal of Political Philosophy. 17 (2): 202–227. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00325.x. ISSN 0963-8016. S2CID 48880069.
50. Robert Brotherton (19 November 2015). "Introduction". Suspicious Minds: Why We Believe Conspiracy Theories. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4729-1564-1.
51. Lewandowsky, S.; Cook, J. (2020). The Conspiracy Theory Handbook. John Cook, Center for Climate Change Communication, George Mason University. Retrieved 17 November 2021.
52. Oxford English Dictionary Second Edition on CD-ROM (v. 4.0), Oxford University Press, 2009, s.v. 4
53. Johnson, Allen (July 1909). "Reviewed Work: The Repeal of the Missouri Compromise: Its Origin and Authorship by P. Orman Ray". The American Historical Review. 14 (4): 835–836. doi:10.2307/1837085. hdl:2027/loc.ark:/13960/t27948c87. JSTOR 1837085. The claim that [David R.] Atchison was the originator of the [Missouri Compromise] repeal may be termed a recrudescence of the conspiracy theory first asserted by Colonel John A. Parker of Virginia in 1880.
54. Robertson, Lockhart; Association of Medical Officers of Asylums and Hospitals for the Insane (London, England); Medico-psychological Association of Great Britain and Ireland; Royal Medico-psychological Association (April 1870). Maudsley, Henry; Sibbald, John (eds.). "The Report of a Quarterly Meeting of the Medico-Psychological Association, held in London at the Royal Medico-Chirurgical Society, by permission of the President and Council, on the 27th January, 1870. [in Part IV. Psychological News.]". The Journal of Mental Science. XVI (73). London: Longman, Green, Longman, & Roberts. ISSN 0368-315X. OCLC 4642826321. The theory of Dr. Sankey as to the manner in which these injuries to the chest occurred in asylums deserved our careful attention. It was at least more plausible that the conspiracy theory of Mr. Charles Reade, and the precautionary measure suggested by Dr. Sankey of using a padded waistcoat in recent cases of mania with general paralysis—in which mental condition nearly all these cases under discussion were—seemed to him of practical value.
55. Bristed, C. A. (11 January 1863). "English Insincerity on the Slavery Question". The New York Times. p. 3. Retrieved 2 March 2022.
56. Starcevic, Vladan; Brakoulias, Vlasios (14 April 2021). "'Things are not what they seem to be': A proposal for the spectrum approach to conspiracy beliefs". Australasian Psychiatry. 29 (5): 535–539. doi:10.1177/10398562211008182. PMID 33852369. S2CID 233242206.
57. Blaskiewicz, Robert (8 August 2013). "Nope, It Was Always Already Wrong". The Skeptical Inquirer. Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. Archived from the original on 12 December 2015. Retrieved 11 December 2015.
58. McKenzie-McHarg, Andrew (2019) "Conspiracy Theory: The Nineteenth-Century Prehistory of a Twentieth-Century Concept", pp. 78, 76. In Joseph E. Uscinski (ed) Conspiracy Theories & the People Who Believe Them. New York: Oxford University Press.
59. Monbiot, George (4 May 2024). "'You're going to call me a Holocaust denier now, are you?': George Monbiot comes face to face with his local conspiracy theorist". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 4 May 2024.
60. Robert Brotherton (19 November 2015). "Chapter 4". Suspicious Minds: Why We Believe Conspiracy Theories. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4729-1564-1.
61. deHaven-Smith, Lance (15 April 2013). Conspiracy Theory in America. University of Texas Press. p. 3. ISBN 9780292743793. Archived from the original on 6 September 2016. Retrieved 27 January 2016. The term 'conspiracy theory' did not exist as a phrase in everyday American conversation before 1964. ... In 1964, the year the Warren Commission issued its report, The New York Times published five stories in which 'conspiracy theory' appeared.
62. Butter, Michael (16 March 2020). "There's a conspiracy theory that the CIA invented the term 'conspiracy theory' – here's why". The Conversation. The Conversation Trust (UK) Limited. Retrieved 23 November 2020.
63. Brotherton, Robert (2013). "Towards a definition of 'conspiracy theory'" (PDF). PsyPAG Quarterly. 1 (88): 9–14. doi:10.53841/bpspag.2013.1.88.9. S2CID 141788005. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 October 2013.
64. "History's greatest conspiracy theories". The Daily Telegraph. 12 November 2008. Archived from the original on 12 March 2018. Retrieved 5 April 2018.
65. J. Byford (12 October 2011). Conspiracy Theories: A Critical Introduction. Springer. pp. 7–8. ISBN 978-0-230-34921-6.
66. Adam M. Enders, "Conspiratorial Thinking and Political Constraint". Public Opinion Quarterly 83.3 (2019): 510–533.
67. West, Harry G.; Sanders, Todd (2003). Transparency and conspiracy: ethnographies of suspicion in the new world order. Duke University Press. p. 4. ISBN 978-0-8223-3024-0. Archived from the original on 22 January 2017. Retrieved 18 August 2016.
68. Kahn, Brian (2 November 2017). "There's a Damn Good Chance Your Neighbor Thinks Chemtrails Are Real". Gizmodo Earther. Archived from the original on 7 March 2019. Retrieved 5 March 2019.
69. Wood, M. (2015). "Has the Internet been good for conspiracy theorising?" (PDF). Psychology Postgraduate Affairs Group (PsyPAG) Quarterly (88): 31–33. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 August 2015. Retrieved 12 September 2015.
70. Ballatore, A. (2015). "Google chemtrails: A methodology to analyze topic representation in search engine results". First Monday. 20 (7). doi:10.5210/fm.v20i7.5597. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 12 September 2015.
71. Enders, Adam M.; Smallpage, Steven M.; Lupton, Robert N. (9 July 2018). "Are All 'Birthers' Conspiracy Theorists? On the Relationship Between Conspiratorial Thinking and Political Orientations". British Journal of Political Science. 50 (3): 849–866. doi:10.1017/s0007123417000837. ISSN 0007-1234. S2CID 149762298.
72. Sweek, Joel (October 2006). "Michael Barkun. A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003. xii+243 pp. $24.95 (cloth)". The Journal of Religion. 86 (4): 691–692. doi:10.1086/509680. ISSN 0022-4189.
73. Hunt, Albert R. (3 April 2011). "Republicans Ride Theories of the Fringe". The New York Times. Bloomberg News. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 8 April 2011. Retrieved 23 April 2020.
74. "Even If It's 'Bonkers,' Poll Finds Many Believe QAnon And Other Conspiracy Theories". NPR.
75. Muirhead, Russell; Rosenblum, Nancy L. (1 February 2021). "Will Reality Bite Back: Conspiratorial Fictions and the Assault on Democracy". The Forum. 18 (3): 415–433. doi:10.1515/for-2020-2016. ISSN 1540-8884.
76. Muirhead, Russell; Rosenblum, Nancy L. (2019). A Lot of People Are Saying: The New Conspiracism and the Assault on Democracy. Princeton University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv941trn. ISBN 978-0-691-18883-6. JSTOR j.ctv941trn. S2CID 159357706.
77. Jesse Walker, The United States of Paranoia: A Conspiracy Theory (2013) excerpt and text search Archived 12 May 2019 at the Wayback Machine
78. Barkun 2003, p. 6.
79. Marcus, B.K. (2006). "Radio Free Rothbard". Journal of Libertarian Studies. 20 (1): 17–51. Retrieved 24 August 2023.
80. Barkun 2003, p. 7.
81. Achbar, Mark, ed. (1994). Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media. Black Rose Books Ltd. p. 131. ISBN 978-1-55164-002-0.
82. Jack Z. Bratich (7 February 2008). Conspiracy Panics: Political Rationality and Popular Culture. State University of New York Press, Albany. pp. 98–100. ISBN 9780791473344. Archived from the original on 18 April 2019. Retrieved 16 June 2015.
83. Jovan Byford (12 October 2011). Conspiracy Theories: A Critical Introduction. Palgrave MacMillan. pp. 25–27. ISBN 9780230349216. Archived from the original on 25 January 2014. Retrieved 16 June 2015.
84. Brotherton, Robert; French, Christopher C. (2014). "Belief in Conspiracy Theories and Susceptibility to the Conjunction Fallacy". Applied Cognitive Psychology. 28 (2): 238–248. doi:10.1002/acp.2995. ISSN 0888-4080.
85. Birchall, Clare (2006). "Cultural studies on/as conspiracy theory". In Birchall, Clare (ed.). Knowledge goes pop from conspiracy theory to gossip. Oxford, New York: Berg. ISBN 978-1-84520-143-2.
86. Birchall, Clare (2004). "Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they're not out to get you". Culture Machine, Deconstruction Is/In Cultural Studies. 6. Archived from the original on 23 September 2015. Retrieved 11 March 2015.
87. Peter Knight (1 January 2003). Conspiracy Theories in American History: An Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. pp. 730–. ISBN 978-1-57607-812-9. Archived from the original on 6 September 2016. Retrieved 27 January 2016.
88. Bjerg, Ole (2016). "Conspiracy Theory: Truth Claim or Language Game?". Theory, Culture & Society. 34 (1): 7–8. doi:10.1177/0263276416657880. hdl:10398/815ad149-79b0-4000-9d07-327893a24ee6. Retrieved 24 April 2024. It also seems to be the case that the way we normally use the term conspiracy theory excludes instances where the theory has been generally accepted as true...Just as the Watergate scandal is now part of the official account of the Nixon administration, the NSA monitoring practices are arguably also part of our present understanding of the way that US intelligence works and neither thus qualify as 'conspiracy theories' anymore. The point here is that when we employ the term 'conspiracy theory' in actual language use, we are implicitly assuming and implying that the claims advanced by the theory are not true.
89. Ron Rosenbaum (2012). "Ah, Watergate". New Republic. Archived from the original on 6 August 2016. Retrieved 29 June 2016.
90. Bigliardi, Stefano (July–August 2020). "Who's Afraid Of Conspiracy Theory Theory?". Skeptical Inquirer. Amherst, New York: Center for Inquiry.
91. Novella, Steven, et al. The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe: How to Know What's Really Real in a World Increasingly Full of Fake. Grand Central Publishing, 2018. p. 208.
92. Nuccitelli, Dana (23 October 2013). "Fox News defends global warming false balance by denying the 97% consensus". The Guardian. Retrieved 5 October 2023.
93. DiFonzo, Nicholas; Bordia, Prashant; Rosnow, Ralph L. (1994). "Reining in rumors". Organizational Dynamics. 23 (1): 47–62. doi:10.1016/0090-2616(94)90087-6. ISSN 0090-2616.
94. Jolley, Daniel (2013). "The detrimental nature of conspiracy theories" (PDF). PsyPAG Quarterly. 1 (88): 35–39. doi:10.53841/bpspag.2013.1.88.35. S2CID 255910928.
95. Linden, Sander van der (30 April 2013). "Why People Believe in Conspiracy Theories". Scientific American. Retrieved 16 October 2020.
96. Robert Brotherton (19 November 2015). "Epilogue". Suspicious Minds: Why We Believe Conspiracy Theories. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4729-1564-1.
97. Connolly, Jennifer M.; Uscinski, Joseph E.; Klofstad, Casey A.; West, Jonathan P. (2019). "Communicating to the Public in the Era of Conspiracy Theory". Public Integrity. 21 (5): 469–476. doi:10.1080/10999922.2019.1603045. ISSN 1099-9922.
98. Lazić, Aleksandra; Žeželj, Iris (18 May 2021). "A systematic review of narrative interventions: Lessons for countering anti-vaccination conspiracy theories and misinformation". Public Understanding of Science. 30 (6). SAGE Publications: 644–670. doi:10.1177/09636625211011881. ISSN 0963-6625. PMID 34006153.
99. Hardin, Russell (7 January 2002). "The Crippled Epistemology of Extremism". Political Extremism and Rationality. Cambridge University Press. p. 20. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511550478.002. ISBN 978-0-521-80441-7.
100. Diaz Ruiz, Carlos; Nilsson, Tomas (2023). "Disinformation and Echo Chambers: How Disinformation Circulates on Social Media Through Identity-Driven Controversies". Journal of Public Policy & Marketing. 42 (1): 18–35. doi:10.1177/07439156221103852. ISSN 0743-9156. S2CID 248934562. This article incorporates text from this source, which is available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
101. Pierre, JM (2020). "Mistrust and misinformation: A two-component, socio-epistemic model of belief in conspiracy theories". J Soc Polit Psychol. 8 (2): 617–641. doi:10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1362.
102. Aftab, Awais (2021). "There and Back Again: Joseph Pierre, M.D." Psychiatric Times. 38 (1).
103. Adornetti, Ines (8 November 2023). "Investigating conspiracy theories in the light of narrative persuasion". Frontiers in Psychology. 14. Frontiers Media SA. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1288125. ISSN 1664-1078. PMC 10663292. PMID 38022962.
104. Moyer, Melinda Wenner (1 March 2019). "People Drawn to Conspiracy Theories Share a Cluster of Psychological Features". Scientific American. Retrieved 16 October 2020.
105. Swire-Thompson B, DeGutis J, Lazer D (2020). "Searching for the Backfire Effect: Measurement and Design Considerations". J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 9 (3): 286–299. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.06.006. PMC 7462781. PMID 32905023.
106. Nyhan B (2021). "Why the backfire effect does not explain the durability of political misperceptions". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 118 (15). Bibcode:2021PNAS..11812440N. doi:10.1073/pnas.1912440117. PMC 8053951. PMID 33837144.
107. Nefes, Türkay S (2013). "Political parties' perceptions and uses of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories in Turkey". The Sociological Review. 61 (2): 247–264. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12016. S2CID 145632390.
108. Nefes, Türkay S. (2012). "The History of the Social Constructions of Dönmes (Converts)*". Journal of Historical Sociology. 25 (3): 413–439. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6443.2012.01434.x.
109. Mintz, Frank P. (1985). The Liberty Lobby and the American Right: Race, Conspiracy, and Culture. Westport, CT: Greenwood. ISBN 978-0-313-24393-6.
110. Douglas, Karen M.; Sutton, Robbie M. (12 April 2011). "Does it take one to know one? Endorsement of conspiracy theories is influenced by personal willingness to conspire" (PDF). British Journal of Social Psychology. 10 (3): 544–552. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02018.x. PMID 21486312. S2CID 7318352. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 November 2018. Retrieved 28 December 2018.
111. Barron, David; Furnham, Adrian; Weis, Laura; Morgan, Kevin D.; Towell, Tony; Swami, Viren (January 2018). "The relationship between schizotypal facets and conspiracist beliefs via cognitive processes" (PDF). Psychiatry Research. 259: 15–20. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.10.001. ISSN 1872-7123. PMID 29024855. S2CID 43823184.
112. Darwin, Hannah; Neave, Nick; Holmes, Joni (1 June 2011). "Belief in conspiracy theories. The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy". Personality and Individual Differences. 50 (8): 1289–1293. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.027. ISSN 0191-8869.
113. Barron, David; Morgan, Kevin; Towell, Tony; Altemeyer, Boris; Swami, Viren (1 November 2014). "Associations between schizotypy and belief in conspiracist ideation" (PDF). Personality and Individual Differences. 70: 156–159. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.040. ISSN 0191-8869.
114. D, Barron; A, Furnham; L, Weis; Kd, Morgan; T, Towell; V, Swami (January 2018). "The Relationship Between Schizotypal Facets and Conspiracist Beliefs via Cognitive Processes" (PDF). Psychiatry Research. 259: 15–20. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.10.001. PMID 29024855. S2CID 43823184.
115. Dagnall, Neil; Drinkwater, Kenneth; Parker, Andrew; Denovan, Andrew; Parton, Megan (2015). "Conspiracy theory and cognitive style: a worldview". Frontiers in Psychology. 6: 206. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00206. ISSN 1664-1078. PMC 4340140. PMID 25762969.
116. Stojanov, Ana; Halberstadt, Jamin (2020). "Does lack of control lead to conspiracy beliefs? A meta-analysis". European Journal of Social Psychology. 50 (5): 955–968. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2690. ISSN 0046-2772. S2CID 219744361.
117. Sutton, Robbie M; Douglas, Karen M (2020). "Conspiracy theories and the conspiracy mindset: implications for political ideology". Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. 34: 118–122. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.02.015. ISSN 2352-1546. S2CID 214735855.
118. Michal Bilewicz; Aleksandra Cichocka; Wiktor Soral (15 May 2015). The Psychology of Conspiracy. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-59952-4.
119. Bensley, D. Alan; Lilienfeld, Scott O.; Rowan, Krystal A.; Masciocchi, Christopher M.; Grain, Florent (2020). "The generality of belief in unsubstantiated claims". Applied Cognitive Psychology. 34 (1): 16–28. doi:10.1002/acp.3581. hdl:11343/286891. ISSN 1099-0720. S2CID 197707663.
120. Goreis, Andreas; Voracek, Martin (2019). "A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Psychological Research on Conspiracy Beliefs: Field Characteristics, Measurement Instruments, and Associations With Personality Traits". Frontiers in Psychology. 10: 205. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00205. ISSN 1664-1078. PMC 6396711. PMID 30853921.
121. Barkun 2003, p. 3.
122. Berlet, Chip (September 2004). "Interview: Michael Barkun". Archived from the original on 2 April 2009. Retrieved 1 October 2009. The issue of conspiracism versus rational criticism is a tough one, and some people (Jodi Dean, for example) argue that the former is simply a variety of the latter. I don't accept this, although I certainly acknowledge that there have been conspiracies. They simply don't have the attributes of almost superhuman power and cunning that conspiracists attribute to them.
123. Imhoff, Roland (17 April 2018). "Conspiracy Theorists Just Want to Feel Special". motherboard.vice.com. Archived from the original on 28 April 2019. Retrieved 6 July 2018.
124. Baigent, Michael; Leigh, Richard; Lincoln, Henry (1987). The Messianic Legacy. Henry Holt & Co. ISBN 978-0-8050-0568-4.
125. Justin Fox: "Wall Streeters like conspiracy theories. Always have" Archived 26 February 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Time, 1 October 2009.
126. Goertzel (1994). "Belief in Conspiracy Theories". Political Psychology. 15 (4): 731–742. doi:10.2307/3791630. JSTOR 3791630. Archived from the original on 31 August 2006. Retrieved 7 August 2006.
127. Douglas, Karen; Sutton, Robbie (2008). "The hidden impact of conspiracy theories: Perceived and actual influence of theories surrounding the death of Princess Diana". Journal of Social Psychology. 148 (2): 210–22. doi:10.3200/SOCP.148.2.210-222. PMID 18512419. S2CID 8717161.
128. Hofstadter, Richard (1965). The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. pp. 32–33. ISBN 978-0-674-65461-7. Archived from the original on 18 April 2019. Retrieved 27 October 2018.
129. Hodapp, Christopher; Alice Von Kannon (2008). Conspiracy Theories & Secret Societies For Dummies. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-18408-0.
130. Cohen, Roger (20 December 2010). "The Captive Arab Mind". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 25 June 2017. Retrieved 18 February 2017.
131. Berlet, Chip; Lyons, Matthew N. (2000). Right-Wing Populism in America: Too Close for Comfort. New York: Guilford Press. ISBN 978-1-57230-562-5. Archived from the original on 16 December 2019. Retrieved 9 November 2019.^{[page needed]}
132. Swami, Viren; Coles, Rebecca; Stieger, Stefan; Pietschnig, Jakob; Furnham, Adrian; Rehim, Sherry; Voracek, Martin (2011). "Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories". British Journal of Psychology. 102 (3): 443–463. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02004.x. ISSN 2044-8295. PMID 21751999.
133. van Prooijen, Jan-Willem; Jostmann, Nils B. (17 December 2012). "Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality". European Journal of Social Psychology. 43 (1): 109–115. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1922. ISSN 0046-2772.
134. Dagnall, Neil; Drinkwater, Kenneth; Parker, Andrew; Denovan, Andrew; Parton, Megan (2015). "Conspiracy theory and cognitive style: a worldview". Frontiers in Psychology. 6: 206. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00206. ISSN 1664-1078. PMC 4340140. PMID 25762969.
135. Bullock, John G.; Lenz, Gabriel (11 May 2019). "Partisan Bias in Surveys". Annual Review of Political Science. 22 (1): 325–342. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-050904. ISSN 1094-2939.
136. Bolton, Doug (2 December 2015). "Scientists find a link between low intelligence and acceptance of 'pseudo-profound bulls***'". The Independent.
137. Douglas, Karen M.; Sutton, Robbie M.; Cichocka, Aleksandra (7 December 2017). "The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories". Current Directions in Psychological Science. 26 (6): 538–542. doi:10.1177/0963721417718261. PMC 5724570. PMID 29276345.
138. Cassam, Quassim (13 March 2015). "Bad Thinkers". Aeon.
139. van Prooijen, Jan-Willem, and Van Vugt, Mark (2018) "Conspiracy theories: Evolved functions and psychological mechanisms" Perspectives on Psychological Science v.13, n.6, pp.770–788
140. Danesi, Marcel (July 30, 2023) "What Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin and Viktor Orbán Understand About Your Brain" Politico
141. Uscinski, Joseph E. (2 July 2019). "Conspiring for the Common Good". Skeptical Inquirer. Center for Inquiry. Archived from the original on 2 April 2020. Retrieved 9 February 2020.
142. Vedantam, Shankar (5 June 2006). "Born With the Desire to Know the Unknown". The Washington Post. p. A02. Archived from the original on 1 May 2011. Retrieved 7 June 2006. Sociologist Theodore Sasson has remarked, "Conspiracy theories explain disturbing events or social phenomena in terms of the actions of specific, powerful individuals. By providing simple explanations of distressing events—the conspiracy theory in the Arab world, for example, that the 11 September attacks were planned by the Israeli Mossad—they deflect responsibility or keep people from acknowledging that tragic events sometimes happen inexplicably."
143. Wilson, Keith (1 November 1996). Forging the Collective Memory: Government and International Historians through Two World Wars. Berghahn Books. ISBN 978-1-78238-828-9.
144. Latour, Bruno (Winter 2004), "Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern." (PDF), Critical Inquiry, 30 (2): 225–48, doi:10.1086/421123, S2CID 159523434, archived (PDF) from the original on 16 September 2012, retrieved 16 September 2012
145. Kelly, Michael (12 June 1995). "THE ROAD TO PARANOIA". The New Yorker. ISSN 0028-792X. Archived from the original on 9 April 2018. Retrieved 9 April 2018.
146. Barkun 2003, p. 230.
147. Barkun 2003, pp. 207, 210, 211.
148. Barkun 2003, pp. 193, 197.
149. Novella, Steven, et al. The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe: How to Know What's Really Real in a World Increasingly Full of Fake. Grand Central Publishing, 2018. pp. 206–207.
150. Barajas, Joshua (15 February 2016). "How many people does it take to keep a conspiracy alive?". PBS NEWSHOUR. Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). Archived from the original on 13 October 2017. Retrieved 22 July 2016.
151. Grimes, David R (26 January 2016). "On the Viability of Conspiratorial Beliefs". PLOS ONE. 11 (1): e0147905. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1147905G. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147905. PMC 4728076. PMID 26812482.
152. Novella, Steven, et al. The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe: How to Know What's Really Real in a World Increasingly Full of Fake. Grand Central Publishing, 2018. pp. 209–210.
153. "On the Viability of Conspiratorial Beliefs". PubPeer. Archived from the original on 22 March 2024.
154. Tiffany, Kaitlyn (17 March 2021). "The truth seekers are coming". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 24 January 2023. Retrieved 24 January 2023.
155. Evans, Steve (16 May 2022). "'Rabbit hole of a conspiracy cult': 'Cooker' watching a new ACT pursuit". The Canberra Times. Archived from the original on 14 January 2023. Retrieved 24 January 2023.
156. Withers, Rachel (17 November 2022). "Cooking up a storm". The Monthly. Retrieved 24 January 2023.
157. "'Cookers' are a product of the modern Left". The Spectator Australia. 16 December 2022. Retrieved 24 January 2023.
158. "International Poll: No Consensus On Who Was Behind 9/11". WorldPublicOpinion.org. University of Maryland, College Park: Program on International Policy Attitudes. 10 September 2008. Archived from the original on 5 July 2011.
159. Popper, Karl (1945). "14". Open Society and Its Enemies, Book II. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
160. "Extracts from "The Open Society and Its Enemies Volume 2: The High Tide of Prophecy: Hegel, Marx and the Aftermath" by Karl Raimund Popper (Originally published 1945)". Lachlan Cranswick, quoting Karl Raimund Popper. Archived from the original on 3 September 2006. Retrieved 5 September 2006.
161. Cumings, Bruce (1999). The Origins of the Korean War, Vol. II, The Roaring of the Cataract, 1947–1950. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.^{[page needed]}
162. Shermer, Michael (2010). "The Conspiracy Theory Detector". Scientific American. 303 (6): 102. Bibcode:2010SciAm.303f.102S. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1210-102. Retrieved 14 July 2021.
163. Matthew Gray (2010). Conspiracy Theories in the Arab World. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-57518-8.
164. Wakin, Daniel J. (26 October 2002). "Anti-Semitic 'Elders of Zion' Gets New Life on Egypt TV". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 16 August 2014. Retrieved 26 August 2014.
165. "2006 Saudi Arabia's Curriculum of Intolerance" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 August 2006. Report by Center for Religious Freedom of Freedom House. 2006
166. "The Booksellers of Tehran" Archived 10 April 2017 at the Wayback Machine, The Wall Street Journal, 28 October 2005
167. Steven Stalinsky (6 May 2004). "A Vast Conspiracy". National Review. Archived from the original on 4 October 2013.
168. Matthew Gray (12 July 2010). Conspiracy Theories in the Arab World: Sources and Politics. Routledge. pp. 158–159. ISBN 978-1-136-96751-1.
169. Mustafa Akyol (12 September 2016). "The Tin-Foil Hats Are Out in Turkey". Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on 9 January 2017. Retrieved 10 January 2017.
170. Selim Koru (21 June 2018). "How Nietzsche Explains Turkey". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 21 June 2018. Retrieved 21 June 2018.
171. Marin Lessenski (March 2018). "COMMON SENSE WANTED - Resilence to 'post-truth' and its predictors in the new media literacy index 2018" (PDF). Open Society Institute – Sofia. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 April 2018. Retrieved 6 April 2018.
172. Marc David Baer (2013). "An Enemy Old and New: The Dönme, Anti-Semitism, and Conspiracy Theories in the Ottoman Empire and Turkish Republic". Jewish Quarterly Review. 103 (4): 523–555. doi:10.1353/jqr.2013.0033. S2CID 159483845 – via Project MUSE.
173. Lamprou, Alexandros (2022). "The journal İnkılâp and the appeal of antisemitism in interwar Turkey". Middle Eastern Studies. 58: 32–47. doi:10.1080/00263206.2021.1950691.
174. "In Turkey, conspiracy theories about the Peace Treaty of Lausanne run riot". The Skeptic. 29 March 2023. Archived from the original on 2 July 2023. Retrieved 17 May 2024.
175. "Lozan Antlaşması'nın 100. Yılında Komplo Teorileri ve Gizli Maddelerin İzinde". Yalansavar (in Turkish). 25 July 2023. Archived from the original on 6 August 2023. Retrieved 17 May 2024.
176. Göçek, Fatma Müge (2011). The Transformation of Turkey: Redefining State and Society from the Ottoman Empire to the Modern Era. London: I.B.Tauris. p. 105. ISBN 9781848856110.
177. Bailyn, Bernard (1992) [1967]. 'The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-44302-0. ASIN: B000NUF6FQ.^{[page needed]}
178. Harry G. West; et al. Transparency and Conspiracy: Ethnographies of Suspicion in the New World Order. Duke University Press Books. pp. 4, 207–08.
179. Shermer, Michael, and Pat Linse. Conspiracy Theories. Altadena, CA: Skeptics Society, n.d. Print.
180. Jewett, Robert; John Shelton Lawrence (2004) Captain America and the Crusade Against Evil: The Dilemma of Zealous Nationalism Archived 18 April 2019 at the Wayback Machine Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing p. 206.
181. Rogin, Michael Paul (1988). Ronald Reagan, the Movie and Other Episodes in Political Demonology. University of California Press. p. 7. ISBN 978-0-520-06469-0.
182. Olmsted, Kathryn S. (2011). Real Enemies: Conspiracy Theories and American Democracy, World War I to 9/11 Archived 18 April 2019 at the Wayback Machine. Oxford University Press, p. 8.
183. Friedersdorf, Conor (29 October 2011). "Ron Paul, Conspiracy Theories, and the Right". The Atlantic. Retrieved 30 August 2020.
184. Stack, Liam (October 3, 2016). "He Calls Hillary Clinton a 'Demon.' Who Is Alex Jones?" The New York Times
185. Bracewell, Lorna (21 January 2021). "Gender, Populism, and the QAnon Conspiracy Movement". Frontiers in Sociology. 5. Frontiers Media: 615727. doi:10.3389/fsoc.2020.615727. ISSN 2297-7775. PMC 8022489. PMID 33869533. S2CID 231654586.
186. O'Donnell, Jonathon (September 2020). Stausberg, Michael; Engler, Steven (eds.). "The deliverance of the administrative state: Deep state conspiracism, charismatic demonology, and the post-truth politics of American Christian nationalism". Religion. 50 (4). Taylor & Francis: 696–719. doi:10.1080/0048721X.2020.1810817. ISSN 1096-1151. S2CID 222094116.
187. Roose, Kevin (3 September 2021) [4 March 2021]. "What Is QAnon, the Viral Pro-Trump Conspiracy Theory?". The New York Times. New York City. Archived from the original on 19 September 2021. Retrieved 25 September 2021.
188. Bowman, Emma (4 February 2021). "Why QAnon Survives After Trump". NPR.org. Washington, D.C. Archived from the original on 5 September 2021. Retrieved 25 September 2021.

Further reading

• Aaronovitch, David (2010). Voodoo Histories: The Role of the Conspiracy Theory in Shaping Modern History. Riverhead. ISBN 978-1-59448-895-5.
• Arnold, Gordon B., ed. (2008). Conspiracy Theory in Film, Television, and Politics. Praeger Publishers. p. 200. ISBN 978-0-275-99462-4.
• Burnett, Thom. Conspiracy Encyclopedia: The Encyclopedia of Conspiracy Theories
• Butter, Michael; Peter Knight (November 2015). "Bridging the Great Divide: Conspiracy Theory Research for the 21st Century". Diogenes. 62 (3–4: Conspiracy Theories Today): 17–29. doi:10.1177/0392192116669289. S2CID 152067265.
• Chase, Alston (2003). Harvard and the Unabomber: The Education of an American Terrorist. New York: W. W. Norton. ISBN 978-0-393-02002-1.
• Coward, Barry, ed. (2004). Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theory in Early Modern Europe: From the Waldensians to the French Revolution. Ashgate Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7546-3564-2.
• "Conspiracy Theories" (PDF). CQ Researcher. 19 (37): 885–908. 23 October 2009. ISSN 1056-2036. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
• Cziesche, Dominik; Jürgen Dahlkamp; Ulrich Fichtner; Ulrich Jaeger; Gunther Latsch; Gisela Leske; Max F. Ruppert (2003). "Panoply of the Absurd". Der Spiegel. Retrieved 28 November 2023.
• De Graaf, Beatrice and Zwierlein, Cornel (eds.) "Security and Conspiracy in History, 16th to 21st Century". Historical Social Research 38, Special Issue, 2013
• Fleming, Chris and Emma A. Jane. Modern Conspiracy: The Importance of Being Paranoid. New York and London: Bloomsbury, 2014. ISBN 978-1-62356-091-1.
• Goertzel, Ted. "Belief in conspiracy theories". Political Psychology (1994): 731–742. online Archived 31 August 2006 at the Wayback Machine
• Graff, Garrett (2023). UFO: The Inside Story of the US Government's Search for Alien Life Here—and Out There. New York: Avid Reader Press. ISBN 9781982196776. OCLC 1407420009.
• Harris, Lee. "The Trouble with Conspiracy Theories". The American, 12 January 2013.
• Hofstadter, Richard. The Paranoid Style in American Politics (1954). online
• Johnson, George (1983). Architects of Fear: Conspiracy Theories and Paranoia in American Politics. Los Angeles: Jeremy P. Tarcher. ISBN 978-0-87477-275-3.
• McConnachie, James; Tudge, Robin (2005). The Rough Guide to Conspiracy Theories. Rough Guides. ISBN 978-1-84353-445-7.
• Melley, Timothy (1999). Empire of Conspiracy: The Culture of Paranoia in Postwar America. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0-8014-8606-7.
• Meigs, James B. (2006). "The Conspiracy Industry". Popular Mechanics. Archived from the original on 24 October 2006. Retrieved 13 October 2006.
• Nefes, Türkay Salim (2012). "The history of the social constructions of Dönmes". Journal of Historical Sociology. 25 (3): 413–39. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6443.2012.01434.x.
• Nefes, Türkay Salim (2013). "Political parties' perceptions and uses of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories in Turkey". The Sociological Review. 61 (2): 247–64. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12016. S2CID 145632390.
• Oliver, J. Eric, and Thomas J. Wood. "Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style(s) of mass opinion". American Journal of Political Science 58.4 (2014): 952–966.online
• Parsons, Charlotte (24 September 2001). "Why we need conspiracy theories". Americas. BBC News. Retrieved 26 June 2006.
• Pipes, Daniel (1998). The Hidden Hand: Middle East Fears of Conspiracy. New York: St. Martin's Press. ISBN 978-0-312-17688-4.
• Pipes, Daniel (1997). Conspiracy: How the Paranoid Style Flourishes and Where It Comes From. New York: The Free Press. ISBN 978-0-684-87111-0.
• Pigden, Charles (1995). "Popper Revisited, or What Is Wrong with Conspiracy Theories?". Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 25 (1): 3–34. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.964.4190. doi:10.1177/004839319502500101. S2CID 143602969.
• Sagan, Carl (1996). The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark. New York: The Random House. ISBN 978-0-394-53512-8.
• Slosson, W. "The 'Conspiracy' Superstition". The Unpopular Review, Vol. VII, No. 14, 1917.
• Sunstein, Cass R., and Adrian Vermeule. "Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures". Journal of Political Philosophy 17.2 (2009): 202–227. online
• Uscinski, Joseph E. and Joseph M. Parent, American Conspiracy Theories (2014) excerpt
• Uscinski, Joseph E. "The 5 Most Dangerous Conspiracy Theories of 2016". Politico Magazine (Aug 22, 2016)
• Vankin, Jonathan; John Whalen (2004). The 80 Greatest Conspiracies of All Time. New York: Citadel Press. ISBN 978-0-8065-2531-0.
• Wood, Gordon S. "Conspiracy and the paranoid style: causality and deceit in the eighteenth century". William and Mary Quarterly (1982): 402–441. JSTOR 1919580.

External links

• Conspiracy Theories, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy