Clyde & Co LLP v Bates van Winkelhof

Clyde & Co LLP v Bates van Winkelhof
Court	UK Supreme Court
Keywords
Worker status

Clyde & Co LLP v Bates van Winkelhof [2014] UKSC 32 is a UK labour law case, concerning the scope of protection for workers.

Facts

There was a law firm called clyde and co. It was mean to bates. bates sued clyde.

Judgment

Lady hale said he was a worker. so clyde couldnt be mean to him.

See also

v t e Workplace protection cases
Lawrie-Blum v Land Baden-Wurttenberg (1986) C-66/85
Pfeiffer v Deutsches Rotes Kreuz (2005) C-397/01
Employment Rights Act 1996 s 230
Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher [2011] UKSC 41
Jivraj v Hashwani [2011] UKSC 40
Clyde & Co LLP v Bates van Winkelhof [2014] UKSC 32
Cassidy v Minister of Health [1951] 2 KB 343
Ready Mixed Concrete Ltd v SS for Pensions [1968] 2 QB 497
Market Invest Ltd v Minister for Social Security [1969] 2 QB 173
O’Kelly v Trusthouse Forte plc [1983] ICR 730
Nethermere (St Neots) Ltd v Gardiner [1984] ICR 612
Lee Ting Sang v Chung Chi-Keung [1990] UKPC 1
Hall v Lorimer [1993] EWCA Civ 25
Lane v Shire Roofing Co (Oxford) Ltd [1995] EWCA Civ 37
McMeechan v SS for Employment [1996] EWCA Civ 1166
Carmichael v National Power plc [1999] UKHL 47
Dacas v Brook Street Bureau (UK) Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 217
Muscat v Cable & Wireless Plc [2006] EWCA Civ 220
James v Greenwich LBC [2008] EWCA Civ 35
Muschett v H M Prison Service [2010] EWCA Civ 25
see UK labour law

United Kingdom labour law
Aslam v Uber BV (2016) Case no: 2202550/2015

Notes

References

E McGaughey, A Casebook on Labour Law (Hart 2018) ch 3

Strategi Solo vs Squad di Free Fire: Cara Menang Mudah!