In its modern definition, the order encompasses a whole new group of families (formerly included in the order Polygonales) that never synthesize betalains, among which several families are carnivorous (like Nepenthaceae and Droseraceae).
According to molecular clock calculations, the lineage that led to Caryophyllales split from other plants about 111 million years ago.[5]
Description
The members of Caryophyllales include about 6% of eudicotspecies.[6] This order is part of the core eudicots.[7] Currently, the Caryophyllales contains 37 families, 749 genera, and 11,620 species[8] The monophyly of the Caryophyllales has been supported by DNA sequences, cytochrome c sequence data and heritable characters such as anther wall development and vessel-elements with simple perforations.[9]
Circumscription
As with all taxa, the circumscription of Caryophyllales has changed within various classification systems. All systems recognize a core of families with centrospermous ovules and seeds. More recent treatments have expanded the Caryophyllales to include many carnivorous plants.
Systematists were undecided on whether Caryophyllales should be placed within the rosid complex or sister to the asterid clade.[9] The possible connection between sympetalous angiosperms and Caryophyllales was presaged by Bessey, Hutchinson, and others; as Lawrence relates: "The evidence is reasonably conclusive that the Primulaceae and the Caryophyllaceae have fundamentally the same type of gynecia, and as concluded by Douglas (1936)(and essentially Dickson, 1936) '...the vascular pattern and the presence of locules at the base of the ovary point to the fact that the present much reduced flower of the Primulaceae has descended from an ancestor which was characterized by a plurilocular ovary and axial placentation. This primitive flower might well be found in centrospermal stock as Wernham, Bessy, and Hutchinson have suggested.' "[10]
Caryophyllales is separated into two suborders: Caryophyllineae and Polygonineae.[9] These two suborders were formerly (and sometimes still are) recognized as two orders, Polygonales and Caryophyllales.[9]
As circumscribed by the APG III system (2009), this order includes the same families as the APG II system (see below) plus the new families, Limeaceae, Lophiocarpaceae, Montiaceae, Talinaceae, and Anacampserotaceae.[1]
This represents a slight change from the APG system, of 1998
order Caryophyllales
family Achatocarpaceae
family Aizoaceae
family Amaranthaceae
family Ancistrocladaceae
family Asteropeiaceae
family Basellaceae
family Cactaceae
family Caryophyllaceae
family Didiereaceae
family Dioncophyllaceae
family Droseraceae
family Drosophyllaceae
family Frankeniaceae
family Molluginaceae
family Nepenthaceae
family Nyctaginaceae
family Physenaceae
family Phytolaccaceae
family Plumbaginaceae
family Polygonaceae
family Portulacaceae
family Rhabdodendraceae
family Sarcobataceae
family Simmondsiaceae
family Stegnospermataceae
family Tamaricaceae
Cronquist
The Cronquist system (1981) also recognised the order, with this circumscription:
order Caryophyllales
family Achatocarpaceae
family Aizoaceae
family Amaranthaceae
family Basellaceae
family Cactaceae
family Caryophyllaceae
family Chenopodiaceae
family Didiereaceae
family Nyctaginaceae
family Phytolaccaceae
family Portulacaceae
family Molluginaceae
The difference with the order as recognized by APG lies in the first place in the concept of "order". The APG favours much larger orders and families, and the order Caryophyllales sensu APG should rather be compared to subclass Caryophyllidaesensu Cronquist.
A part of the difference lies with what families are recognized. The plants in the Stegnospermataceae and Barbeuiaceae were included in Cronquist's Phytolaccaceae. The Chenopodiaceae (still recognized by Cronquist) are included in Amaranthaceae by APG.
New to the order (sensu APG) are the Asteropeiaceae and Physenaceae, each containing a single genus, and two genera from Cronquist's order Nepenthales.
^ abcdJuan, R.; Pastor, J.; Alaiz, M.; Vioque, J. (1 September 2007). "Electrophoretic characterization of Amaranthus L. seed proteins and its systematic implications". Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 155 (1): 57–63. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2007.00665.x.
^Lawrence, G.H.M (1960). Taxonomy of Vascular Plants. Macmillan. p. 660.