Substance or process that is indicative of the presence of cancer in the body
A cancer biomarker refers to a substance or process that is indicative of the presence of cancer in the body. A biomarker may be a molecule secreted by a tumor or a specific response of the body to the presence of cancer. Genetic,[1]epigenetic,[2]proteomic,[3]glycomic,[4] and imaging biomarkers can be used for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and epidemiology. Ideally, such biomarkers can be assayed in non-invasively collected biofluids like blood or serum.[5]
Organizations and publications vary in their definition of biomarker. In many areas of medicine, biomarkers are limited to proteins identifiable or measurable in the blood or urine. However, the term is often used to cover any molecular, biochemical, physiological, or anatomical property that can be quantified or measured.
The National Cancer Institute (NCI), in particular, defines biomarker as a: “A biological molecule found in blood, other body fluids, or tissues that is a sign of a normal or abnormal process, or of a condition or disease. A biomarker may be used to see how well the body responds to a treatment for a disease or condition. Also called molecular marker and signature molecule."[18]
In cancer research and medicine, biomarkers are used in three primary ways:[19]
To help diagnose conditions, as in the case of identifying early stage cancers (diagnostic)
To forecast how aggressive a condition is, as in the case of determining a patient's ability to fare in the absence of treatment (prognostic)
To predict how well a patient will respond to treatment (predictive)
Role of biomarkers in cancer research and medicine
Cancer biomarkers can also be useful in establishing a specific diagnosis. This is particularly the case when there is a need to determine whether tumors are of primary or metastatic origin. To make this distinction, researchers can screen the chromosomal alterations found on cells located in the primary tumor site against those found in the secondary site. If the alterations match, the secondary tumor can be identified as metastatic; whereas if the alterations differ, the secondary tumor can be identified as a distinct primary tumor.[21] For example, people with tumors have high levels of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) due to tumor cells that have gone through apoptosis.[22] This tumor marker can be detected in the blood, saliva, or urine.[17] The possibility of identifying an effective biomarker for early cancer diagnosis has recently been questioned, in light of the high molecular heterogeneity of tumors observed by next-generation sequencing studies.[23]
Cancer biomarkers can also be used to determine the most effective treatment regime for a particular person's cancer.[33] Because of differences in each person's genetic makeup, some people metabolize or change the chemical structure of drugs differently. In some cases, decreased metabolism of certain drugs can create dangerous conditions in which high levels of the drug accumulate in the body. As such, drug dosing decisions in particular cancer treatments can benefit from screening for such biomarkers. An example is the gene encoding the enzyme thiopurine methyl-transferase (TPMPT).[34] Individuals with mutations in the TPMT gene are unable to metabolize large amounts of the leukemia drug, mercaptopurine, which potentially causes a fatal drop in white blood count for such patients. Patients with TPMT mutations are thus recommended to be given a lower dose of mercaptopurine for safety considerations.[35]
Monitoring treatment response
Cancer biomarkers have also shown utility in monitoring how well a treatment is working over time. Much research is going into this particular area, since successful biomarkers have the potential of providing significant cost reduction in patient care, as the current image-based tests such as CT and MRI for monitoring tumor status are highly costly.[36]
One notable biomarker garnering significant attention is the protein biomarker S100-beta in monitoring the response of malignant melanoma. In such melanomas, melanocytes, the cells that make pigment in our skin, produce the protein S100-beta in high concentrations dependent on the number of cancer cells. Response to treatment is thus associated with reduced levels of S100-beta in the blood of such individuals.[37][38]
Similarly, additional laboratory research has shown that tumor cells undergoing apoptosis can release cellular components such as cytochrome c, nucleosomes, cleaved cytokeratin-18, and E-cadherin. Studies have found that these macromolecules and others can be found in circulation during cancer therapy, providing a potential source of clinical metrics for monitoring treatment.[36]
Recurrence
Cancer biomarkers can also offer value in predicting or monitoring cancer recurrence. The Oncotype DX® breast cancer assay is one such test used to predict the likelihood of breast cancer recurrence. This test is intended for women with early-stage (Stage I or II), node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) invasive breast cancer who will be treated with hormone therapy. Oncotype DX looks at a panel of 21 genes in cells taken during tumor biopsy. The results of the test are given in the form of a recurrence score that indicates likelihood of recurrence at 10 years.[39][40]
Uses of biomarkers in cancer research
Developing drug targets
In addition to their use in cancer medicine, biomarkers are often used throughout the cancer drug discovery process. For instance, in the 1960s, researchers discovered the majority of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia possessed a particular genetic abnormality on chromosomes 9 and 22 dubbed the Philadelphia chromosome. When these two chromosomes combine they create a cancer-causing gene known as BCR-ABL. In such patients, this gene acts as the principle initial point in all of the physiological manifestations of the leukemia. For many years, the BCR-ABL was simply used as a biomarker to stratify a certain subtype of leukemia. However, drug developers were eventually able to develop imatinib, a powerful drug that effectively inhibited this protein and significantly decreased production of cells containing the Philadelphia chromosome.[41][42]
Surrogate endpoints
Another promising area of biomarker application is in the area of surrogate endpoints. In this application, biomarkers act as stand-ins for the effects of a drug on cancer progression and survival. Ideally, the use of validated biomarkers would prevent patients from having to undergo tumor biopsies and lengthy clinical trials to determine if a new drug worked. In the current standard of care, the metric for determining a drug's effectiveness is to check if it has decreased cancer progression in humans and ultimately whether it prolongs survival. However, successful biomarker surrogates could save substantial time, effort, and money if failing drugs could be eliminated from the development pipeline before being brought to clinical trials.
Some ideal characteristics of surrogate endpoint biomarkers include:[43][44]
Biomarker should be involved in process that causes the cancer
Changes in biomarker should correlate with changes in the disease
Levels of biomarkers should be high enough that they can be measured easily and reliably
Levels or presence of biomarker should readily distinguish between normal, cancerous, and precancerous tissue
Effective treatment of the cancer should change the level of the biomarker
Level of the biomarker should not change spontaneously or in response to other factors not related to the successful treatment of the cancer
Two areas in particular that are receiving attention as surrogate markers include circulating tumor cells (CTCs)[45][46] and circulating miRNAs.[47][48] Both these markers are associated with the number of tumor cells present in the blood, and as such, are hoped to provide a surrogate for tumor progression and metastasis. However, significant barriers to their adoption include the difficulty of enriching, identifying, and measuring CTC and miRNA levels in blood. New technologies and research are likely necessary for their translation into clinical care.[49][50][51]
Not all cancer biomarkers have to be specific to types of cancer. Some biomarkers found in the circulatory system can be used to determine an abnormal growth of cells present in the body. All these types of biomarkers can be identified through diagnostic blood tests, which is one of the main reasons to get regularly health tested. By getting regularly tested, many health issues such as cancer can be discovered at an early stage, preventing many deaths.
The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio has been shown to be a non-specific determinant for many cancers. This ratio focuses on the activity of two components of the immune system that are involved in inflammatory response which is shown to be higher in presence of malignant tumors.[71] Additionally, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) is a protein that is involved in the proliferation of cells. Unfortunately, it has been shown that in the presence of tumors it is highly active which has led to the conclusion that it may help malignant cells reproduce at faster rates.[72] Research has shown that anti-bFGF antibodies can be used to help treat tumors from many origins.[72] Moreover, insulin-like growth factor (IGF-R) is involved in cell proliferation and growth. It has is possible that it is involved in inhibiting apoptosis, programmed cell death due to some defect.[73] Due to this, the levels of IGF-R can be increased when cancer such as breast, prostate, lung, and colorectum is present.[74]
^Musolino A, Bella MA, Bortesi B, Michiara M, Naldi N, Zanelli P, et al. (June 2007). "BRCA mutations, molecular markers, and clinical variables in early-onset breast cancer: a population-based study". Breast. 16 (3): 280–292. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2006.12.003. hdl:11381/1629553. PMID17257844.
^Dienstmann R, Tabernero J (March 2011). "BRAF as a target for cancer therapy". Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry. 11 (3): 285–295. doi:10.2174/187152011795347469. PMID21426297.
^Lamparella N, Barochia A, Almokadem S (2013). "Impact of Genetic Markers on Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer". Impact of Genetic Targets on Cancer Therapy. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. Vol. 779. pp. 145–164. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6176-0_6. ISBN978-1-4614-6175-3. PMID23288638.
^Bantis A, Grammaticos P (Sep–Dec 2012). "Prostatic specific antigen and bone scan in the diagnosis and follow-up of prostate cancer. Can diagnostic significance of PSA be increased?". Hellenic Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 15 (3): 241–246. PMID23227460.
^Kruijff S, Hoekstra HJ (April 2012). "The current status of S-100B as a biomarker in melanoma". European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 38 (4): 281–285. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2011.12.005. PMID22240030.
^ abcLi X, Ye M, Zhang W, Tan D, Jaffrezic-Renault N, Yang X, Guo Z (February 2019). "Liquid biopsy of circulating tumor DNA and biosensor applications". Biosensors & Bioelectronics. 126: 596–607. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2018.11.037. PMID30502682. S2CID56479882.
^"biomarker". NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms. National Cancer Institute. 2011-02-02.
^Dragani TA, Matarese V, Colombo F (April 2020). "Biomarkers for Early Cancer Diagnosis: Prospects for Success through the Lens of Tumor Genetics". BioEssays. 42 (4): e1900122. doi:10.1002/bies.201900122. PMID32128843. S2CID212406467.
^Terpos E, Dimopoulos MA, Shrivastava V, Leitzel K, Christoulas D, Migkou M, et al. (March 2010). "High levels of serum TIMP-1 correlate with advanced disease and predict for poor survival in patients with multiple myeloma treated with novel agents". Leukemia Research. 34 (3): 399–402. doi:10.1016/j.leukres.2009.08.035. PMID19781774.
^Kuukasjärvi T, Kononen J, Helin H, Holli K, Isola J (September 1996). "Loss of estrogen receptor in recurrent breast cancer is associated with poor response to endocrine therapy". Journal of Clinical Oncology. 14 (9): 2584–2589. doi:10.1200/jco.1996.14.9.2584. PMID8823339.
^Harris L, Fritsche H, Mennel R, Norton L, Ravdin P, Taube S, et al. (November 2007). "American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer". Journal of Clinical Oncology. 25 (33): 5287–5312. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.14.2364. PMID17954709.
^Vrbic S, Pejcic I, Filipovic S, Kocic B, Vrbic M (Jan–Mar 2013). "Current and future anti-HER2 therapy in breast cancer". Journal of B.U.On. 18 (1): 4–16. PMID23613383.
^Yoo C, Ryu MH, Ryoo BY, Beck MY, Kang YK (October 2013). "Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of imatinib dose escalation to 800 mg/day in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors". Investigational New Drugs. 31 (5): 1367–1374. doi:10.1007/s10637-013-9961-8. PMID23591629. S2CID29477955.
^Demetri GD, van Oosterom AT, Garrett CR, Blackstein ME, Shah MH, Verweij J, et al. (October 2006). "Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after failure of imatinib: a randomised controlled trial". Lancet. 368 (9544): 1329–1338. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69446-4. PMID17046465. S2CID25931515.
^Karas-Kuzelicki N, Mlinaric-Rascan I (August 2009). "Individualization of thiopurine therapy: thiopurine S-methyltransferase and beyond". Pharmacogenomics. 10 (8): 1309–1322. doi:10.2217/pgs.09.78. PMID19663675.
^ abSchneider JE, Sidhu MK, Doucet C, Kiss N, Ohsfeldt RL, Chalfin D (November 2012). "Economics of cancer biomarkers". Personalized Medicine. 9 (8): 829–837. doi:10.2217/pme.12.87. PMID29776231.
^Henze G, Dummer R, Joller-Jemelka HI, Böni R, Burg G (1997). "Serum S100--a marker for disease monitoring in metastatic melanoma". Dermatology. 194 (3): 208–212. doi:10.1159/000246103. PMID9187834.
^Harpio R, Einarsson R (July 2004). "S100 proteins as cancer biomarkers with focus on S100B in malignant melanoma". Clinical Biochemistry. 37 (7): 512–518. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2004.05.012. PMID15234232.
^Lamond NW, Skedgel C, Younis T (April 2013). "Is the 21-gene recurrence score a cost-effective assay in endocrine-sensitive node-negative breast cancer?". Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research. 13 (2): 243–250. doi:10.1586/erp.13.4. PMID23570435. S2CID33661439.
^Price C, McDonnell D (February 1991). "Effects of niobium filtration and constant potential on the sensitometric responses of dental radiographic films". Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology. 20 (1): 11–16. doi:10.1259/dmfr.20.1.1884846 (inactive 2024-11-28). PMID1884846.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
^Redova M, Sana J, Slaby O (March 2013). "Circulating miRNAs as new blood-based biomarkers for solid cancers". Future Oncology. 9 (3): 387–402. doi:10.2217/fon.12.192. PMID23469974.
^Dhondt B, De Bleser E, Claeys T, Buelens S, Lumen N, Vandesompele J, et al. (December 2019). "Discovery and validation of a serum microRNA signature to characterize oligo- and polymetastatic prostate cancer: not ready for prime time". World Journal of Urology. 37 (12): 2557–2564. doi:10.1007/s00345-018-2609-8. hdl:1854/LU-8586484. PMID30578441. S2CID58594673.