Blesmol

Blesmols Temporal range: Early Miocene–Recent PreꞒ Ꞓ O S D C P T J K Pg N
Damaraland mole-rat
Scientific classification
Domain:	Eukaryota
Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Chordata
Class:	Mammalia
Order:	Rodentia
Parvorder:	Phiomorpha
Family:	Bathyergidae Waterhouse, 1841
Type genus
Bathyergus Illiger, 1811
Genera
Georychus Illiger, 1811 Fukomys Kock et al., 2006 Cryptomys Gray, 1864 Heliophobius Peters, 1846 Bathyergus Illiger, 1811

The blesmols, also known as mole-rats, or African mole-rats, are burrowing rodents of the family Bathyergidae. They represent a distinct evolution of a subterranean life among rodents much like the pocket gophers of North America, the tuco-tucos in South America, and the Spalacidae from Eurasia.

Distribution

Modern blesmols are found strictly in sub-Saharan Africa. Fossil forms are also restricted almost exclusively to Africa, although a few specimens of the Pleistocene species Cryptomys asiaticus have been found in Israel.^[1] Nowak (1999) also reports that †Gypsorhychus has been found in fossil deposits of Mongolia.

Anatomy

Blesmols are somewhat mole-like animals with cylindrical bodies and short limbs. They range from 9 to 30 cm (3.5 to 11.8 in) in length, and from 30 to 1,800 g (1.1 to 63.5 oz) in weight, depending on the species. Blesmols, like many other fossorial mammals, have greatly reduced eyes and ear pinnae, a relatively short tail, loose skin, and (aside from the hairless naked mole rat) velvety fur. Blesmols have very poor vision, although they may use the surfaces of their eyes for sensing air currents. Despite their small or absent pinnae, they have a good sense of hearing, although their most important sense appears to be that of touch. Like other rodents, they have an excellent sense of smell, and they are also able to close their nostrils during digging to prevent them from clogging with dirt.^[2]

The eyes of blesmols are structurally normal, despite their relatively small size, and include normal light-sensitive cells. However, the visual centres of their brains are reduced in certain respects, especially in those centres concerned with localising objects in the visual field. Research has shown that at least two species of blesmol (Fukomys mechowii and Heliophobius argenteocinereus) are not blind, as commonly believed, and will actively avoid blue or green-yellow light. They do not appear able to detect the presence of red light, and can probably not distinguish between different colours. The ability to sense the presence of light is probably useful in allowing them to detect breaches in their tunnel systems and repair them promptly.^[3]

Most blesmol species dig using their powerful incisors and, to a lesser extent, the foreclaws, although dune blesmols dig primarily with their feet, restricting them to soft, sandy soil.^[2] Dune blesmols aside, some species have been reported to be able to extend their burrows by an inch (2.5 cm (0.98 in)) into the walls of concrete enclosures.^{[citation needed]} Their unique skull shape is associated with delivering sheer power to the lateral masseter muscle which is responsible for the powerful bite of the anterior portion of the mouth. The incisors of blesmols are projected forward and protrude from the mouth even when the mouth is closed. This condition allows the animals to burrow with their teeth without getting dirt in their mouths. The number of cheek teeth varies greatly between species, an unusual feature among rodents, so that the dental formula for the family is:

Dentition
1.0.2-3.0-3
1.0.2-3.0-3

Technical characteristics

The skull morphology of blesmols sets them apart from all other rodents. As with all members of their suborder, their jaws are hystricognathous, but, unlike their relatives, they have a highly reduced infraorbital foramen. The medial masseter muscle shows only minimal passage through the infraorbital foramen leading most authorities to consider them protrogomorphous. They are therefore the only protrogomorphous hystricognaths.

Behavior

Blesmols live in elaborate burrow systems and different species exhibit varying degrees of sociality. Most species are solitary, but one species, the damaraland blesmol (Fukomys damarensis) is one of only two eusocial mammals, the other being the naked mole rat.^{[citation needed]} These species are characterized by having a single reproductively active male and female in a colony where the remaining animals are sterile.

These animals prefer loose, sandy soils and are often associated with arid habitats. They rarely come to the surface, spending their entire life underground. Blesmols are herbivorous, and primarily eat roots, tubers, and bulbs. They are even able to pull smaller plants underground by their roots, without having to leave their burrows, enabling them to eat leaves, stems, and other parts of the plant that would otherwise be inaccessible. Blesmols burrow in search of food, and the great majority of their tunnel complex consists of these foraging burrows, surrounding a smaller number of storage areas, nests, and latrine chambers.^[2]

Most species breed only once or twice during the year, although some breed all year round. They generally have small litters of two to five young, perhaps because their environment is sufficiently safe that they do not need to rapidly replace their population as many other rodents do. However, some species have much larger litters, averaging twelve young in the naked mole rat, and sometimes much larger.^[2]

Georychus capensis

Classification

The Bathyergidae are monophyletic, with all taxa tracing back to a single common ancestor.^[4] Although there is some controversy, the closest living relatives of the blesmols appear to be other African hystricognaths in the families Thryonomyidae (cane rats) and Petromuridae (dassie rats). Together these three living families along with their fossil relatives represent the infraorder Phiomorpha.^[5]

Cryptomys hottentotus

Fukomys mechowii

At present 21 species of blesmols from 5 genera are accepted,^[6][7][8] but this number is likely to increase. Like other fossorial rodents such as pocket gophers, tuco-tucos, and blind mole rats, blesmols appear to speciate rapidly. They become geographically isolated easily, leading to various chromosomal forms and genetically distinct races. Some studies have suggested that the genus Bathyergus represents the basal-most lineage; while many researchers had posited that the Naked mole-rat, Heterocephalus, held that position,^[6][7][9] more recent investigation has placed that genus in a separate family, Heterocephalidae.^[10][11][12]

• Family Bathyergidae
  • Subfamily Bathyerginae
    • Georychus - cape blesmol
      • Georychus capensis - cape mole-rat
    • Cryptomys
      • Cryptomys hottentotus - common mole-rat
        • subspecies: C. h. natalensis - Natal mole-rat

        • 

          Heliophobius argenteocinereus

          

          Bathyergus suillus

          subspecies: C. h. nimrodi - Matabeleland mole-rat
        • subspecies: C. h. pretoriae - highveld mole-rat^[13]
    • Fukomys
      • Fukomys amatus - Zambian mole-rat
      • Fukomys anselli - Ansell's mole-rat
      • Fukomys bocagei - Bocage's mole-rat
      • Fukomys damarensis - Damaraland mole-rat
      • Fukomys darlingi - Mashona mole-rat
      • Fukomys foxi - Nigerian mole-rat
      • Fukomys ilariae^[14] - Somali striped mole-rat
      • Fukomys kafuensis - Kafue mole-rat
      • Fukomys mechowii - Mechow's mole-rat
      • Fukomys micklemi - Kataba mole-rat
      • Fukomys ochraceocinereus - Ochre mole-rat
      • Fukomys whytei - Malawian mole-rat ^{[citation needed]}
        • subspecies: F. w. occlusus
      • Fukomys zechi - Ghana mole-rat
    • Heliophobius - Silvery mole-rat
      • Heliophobius argenteocinereus - Silvery mole-rat
    • Bathyergus - Dune blesmols
      • Bathyergus janetta - Namaqua dune mole-rat
      • Bathyergus suillus - Cape dune mole-rat

Citations

1. Tchernov, Eitan (1984). Martin, Paul S.; Klein, Richard G. (eds.). Quaternary Extinctions: A Prehistoric Revolution. University of Arizona Press. p. 537. ISBN 0-8165-1100-4.
2. Jarvis, Jennifer U.M. (1984). Macdonald, D. (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Mammals. New York: Facts on File. pp. 708–711. ISBN 0-87196-871-1.
3. Kott, O.; et al. (2010). Iwaniuk, Andrew (ed.). "Light Perception in Two Strictly Subterranean Rodents: Life in the Dark or Blue?". PLOS ONE. 5 (7): e11810. Bibcode:2010PLoSO...511810K. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011810. PMC 2911378. PMID 20676369.
4. Bishop, J.M.; Jarvis, J.U.; Spinks, A.C.; Bennett, N.C.; O'Ryan, C. (2004). "Molecular insight into patterns of colony composition and paternity in the common-mole rat Cryptomys hottentotus hottentotus". Molecular Ecology. 13 (5): 1217–1229. Bibcode:2004MolEc..13.1217B. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02131.x. PMID 15078457. S2CID 23091402.
5. Savage, RJG & Long, MR (1986). Mammal Evolution: an illustrated guide. New York: Facts on File. p. 124. ISBN 0-8160-1194-X.
6. Ingram, CM; Burda, H; Honeycutt, RL (2004). "Molecular Phylogenetics and Taxonomy of the African Mole-Rats, Genus Cryptomys and the New Genus Coetomys Gray, 1864". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 31 (3): 997–1014. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2003.11.004. PMID 15120397.
7. Kock, D; Ingram, CM; Frabotta, LJ; Honeycutt, RL; Burda, H (2006). "On the Nomenclature of Bathyergidae and Fukomys n. gen". Zootaxa. 1142: 51–55. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.1142.1.4. hdl:11336/85874.
8. Numbers of species and genera from the preceding sources have been adjusted to reflect the removal of Heterocephalus to family Heterocephalidae.
9. Faulkes, CG; Verheyen, E; Verheyen, W; Jarvis, JUM; Bennett, NC (2004). "Phylogeographical patterns of genetic divergence and speciation in African mole-rats (Family: Bathyergidae)". Molecular Ecology. 13 (3): 613–629. Bibcode:2004MolEc..13..613F. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2004.02099.x. PMID 14871365. S2CID 24040671.
10. Patterson, B.D.; Upham, N.S. (2014). "A newly recognized family from the Horn of Africa, the Heterocephalidae (Rodentia: Ctenohystrica)". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 172 (4): 942–963. doi:10.1111/zoj.12201.
11. Kingdon, Jonathan (2015). The Kingdon Field Guide to African Mammals, Second Edition. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. p. 224. ISBN 978-0691164533.
12. Don E. Wilson; Thomas E. Lacher Jr.; Russell A. Mittermeier, eds. (2016). Handbook of the Mammals of the World Volume 6: Lagomorphs and Rodents. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions. p. 312. ISBN 978-8494189234.
13. Retrieved June 24, 2024, from the Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS) on-line database, www.itis.gov, CC0
14. Gippoliti, S. & Amori, G. (2011). "A new species of mole-rat (Rodentia, Bathyergidae) from the Horn of Africa" (PDF). Zootaxa. 2918: 39–46. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.2918.1.4.

References

• Kingdon, J. 1997. The Kingdon Field Guide to African Mammals. Academic Press Limited, London.
• McKenna, M.C. and S. K. Bell. 1997. Classification of Mammals above the Species Level. Columbia University Press, New York.
• Nowak, R. M. 1999. Walker's Mammals of the World, Vol. 2. Johns Hopkins University Press, London.
• Seney ML, Kelly DA, Goldman BD, Šumbera R, Forger NG (2009) Social Structure Predicts Genital Morphology in African Mole-Rats. PLoS ONE 4(10): e7477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007477. Figure
• Mitgutsch, C., Richardson, M. K., Jiménez, R., Martin, J. E., Kondrashov, P., de, B. M. A., & Sánchez-Villagra, M. R. (January 1, 2012). Circumventing the polydactyly 'constraint': the mole's 'thumb'. Biology Letters, 8, 1, 74–7.

External links