In August and September 2022, Leicester, England, saw a period of religious and ethnic tension between predominately British Hindus and British Muslims of South Asian origin. The unrest saw rioting, protest marches, sloganeering and ethnic violence between the two populations. It was also preceded by social media campaigning, misinformation and hate propaganda. Muslim apprehensions of what they alleged as "Hindutva fascism" entering their neighbourhoods was evidently the main driver behind the unrest.[1][2] Community leaders and analysts point to the Indian celebrations following the India–Pakistan 2022 Asia Cup match on 28 August as a catalyst, which saw a reaction from Pakistani fans.[5]
Background
1km 0.6miles
Map of Leicester showing some of the localities and suburbs
Like most British cities, Leicester has significant and growing South Asian British populations. Leicester is known for its ethnic diversity, and is one of three cities in England where the White British population are a minority. Since the end of the Second World War, the city has seen successive waves of migration, with immigrants from the Indian sub-continent arriving in the 1960s, followed by South Asians arriving from Kenya and Uganda in the early 1970s.[6] By 2021, Leicester's population was 33% Muslim and 25% Hindu.[7]
The 'spatial polarization' developed since the 1970s, with the Belgrave area (a former working class neighbourhood) becoming home to affluent Indian-origin East African Hindus.[11][12]
Scholar Ayesha Siddiqa points out the growing extremism among British Muslims, owing to several factors such as the welcome given to Muslim clergy as a partner in the Afghan wars and the various geopolitical developments that brought various extremist ideologies to congregate in Britain.[13] The Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) that came to power in India, along with prime minister Narendra Modi, is expected to have had high levels of support among the Hindus in UK.[14]
Britain's Muslim press tended to describe the BJP as "fascist" to varying degrees,[15][16][17]
a language actively adopted by Leicester Muslims.[18][19][20]
The British party politics is seen to have caused polarisation between the two communities, with Muslims siding with the Labour Party and Hindus siding with the Conservative Party. The 2019 general election was not only a "Brexit and NHS election", but also a "Kashmir election" according to The Guardian columnist Sunny Hundal. This was a reference to the Modi Government's decisive action in the complete integration of Kashmir into India in 2019, and the corresponding backlash in Pakistan. These developments had reactions in British Hindu and Muslim communities.[21]Rutgers University's Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI), which has investigated the online trends between 2019 and 2022, noted a wide dispersion of anti-Hindu and anti-India slurs and tropes during this period.[22] Anti-Hindu memes accompanied by pejoratives such as "pajeet" (slur for Indian or Hindu), "streetshitter", "poojeet", "scamming" (dishonest), "mong" (unintelligent) etc. have been doing the rounds depicting Hindus as dirty, Islamophobic and barbaric.[23]
Locally in East Leicester, a large batch of Hindu immigrants belonging to Daman and Diu,[note 1] carrying Portuguese passports, are said to have arrived in Leicester in the recent years, before Brexit. They settled in the LE5 postcode area, which was otherwise predominantly Muslim.[24][25][note 2] The celebration of Hindu festivals and public consumption of alcohol by the new arrivals were considered disruptive by Muslims living in the area.[27] Leicester East MP Claudia Webbe stated that friction between the two communities had been "simmering for months".[28]
At least one major incident of communitarian violence has been reported from May, where it was alleged that a Muslim man was surrounded by around 25–30 masked men, and beaten with bats and poles to such an extent that he was hospitalised. The incident was reported to the police, but the Muslim community felt that the police were failing to act, with the result that the perpetrators were still at large and continuing to harass the Muslim community. The Muslim community labelled these perpetrators "Hindutva RSS thugs" and believed that they were from among the recent arrivals from India.[29][30][note 3]
According to Majid Freeman, a self described "former aid worker and a key social media influencer", who has been previously known to make false allegations of Quran burning[32] and for supporting the terrorist group ISIL[33] on online forums, "Muslims had made their presence known in the streets" by August and the "troublemakers had disappeared".[34]
After the 28 August India–Pakistan Asia Cup cricket match, which India won, Indian cricket fans poured onto streets in the Belgrave area to celebrate, waving Indian flags, honking car horns and dancing to dhols. An altercation eventually occurred at the corner of the Shaftsbury Avenue and Melton Road. According to a local business owner, "someone anti-India" stamped on an Indian flag, and the Indian fans thought he was a Pakistani and got infuriated.[35] A video of this incident is available and the man is reported to be a Sikh.[36]
The altercation developed into a brawl, a video clip of which went viral on social media the next day. The clip shows a group of India fans shouting "Pakistan murdabad"[note 4]
and walking to the clash site. A police officer is seen arresting a man, and another group is seen beating up a man, and ripping off his t-shirt.[36]
The incident eventually led to eight arrests, including one man arrested at the scene for assaulting an emergency worker.[40]
Build-up
The following day a twitter user with handle "tragicBud", whose user description included the phrase "fuck them pajeets" (anti-Hindu slur), uploaded the video clip of the brawl, along with an interpretation claiming "Nazi" and "Hindutva" objectives of the participants. This was the beginning of "malicious narratives", as the NCRI researchers described it, interpreting an ordinary cricket match brawl as a "Nazi-like Hindutva" ideology. It led to a steady escalation of tensions in Leicester.[36] A slogan of "death to Muslims" was also alleged to have been raised, but the Leicester police dismissed the claim, not finding any verifiable evidence for it.[41][42]
The video clip uploaded by "tragicBud" was widely shared on social media networks, amplified by Majid Freeman, Ian Miles Cheong, Sunny Hundal, Pat McGinnes and several British conservative participants.[41] Sunny Hundal's forwarding comment, "extreme Hindutva groups go on the rampage in Leicester", gave journalistic respectability to the anti-Hindutva narrative.[35] The Muslim news site "5Pillars UK" announced that Muslim residents of Leicester were being attacked. British comedian and actor Guz Khan, with 100,000 followers on twitter, called on "mandem" (UK slang for "gang") to sort out the "Modi weirdos".[41] Other reputed organisations that address Islamophobic incidents also joined in, interpreting the video clip as representing Islamophobia. The original tweet of tragicBud received 2,037 retweets and the video clip 305,000 views.[36][note 5]
Further clashes
Green Lane Road in East Leicester
Between 4-6 September, anti-Hindu attacks began to be reported from Leicester. On 4 September, the date of another India–Pakistan match which Pakistan won, a Hindu home celebrating Ganesh Chaturthi (a Hindu religious festival) was allegedly attacked, eggs were thrown into the house, a Hindu male was attempted to be stabbed, and his aunt was punched in the nose.[46][47][note 6]
The next day, there were report of British Pakistani mobs targeting Hindu neighbourhoods, some with weapons, chanting "Modi kutta, Hindustan murdabad" ("Modi dog, Death to India").[46] Videos circulated of gangs roaming through the streets and police trying to block them. Hindus started feeling scared in their homes and writing to the local MPs for help.[49][39]
On 5 September, there was a meeting about the incidents attended by over 300 people along with police representatives. After the meeting, a group of Muslims conducted a march through Leicester to show their "presence". It was reported that clashes and stand-offs with the police lasted till 11pm.[48]
On 6 September, Leicester Police were authorised to use dispersal (Sections 34 and 35) and stop-and-search (Section 60) powers.[50] They continued to patrol the areas, but further disturbances also continued.[39]
By 11 September, 19 people had been arrested for incidents in East Leicester, one of them for threats to kill.[40]
Social media campaigns
The Muslim social media accounts continued to propagate misinformation and the branding of Leicester Hindus as "RSS Hindutva thugs". A Muslim author Riaz Khan, with 25,000 followers, linked the incident from May to the cricket match brawl and described the participants of the latter as the same "thugs".[30] Another user with 600,000 subscribers, advised the India fans in the UK to "humble themselves" because the Pakistani gangs over here "go a bit nuts".[30] The most virulent misinformation came from Majid Freeman, who claimed that there was a kidnap attempt of a Muslim school girl by three Hindu men. He claimed that he had spoken to the girl's family and that the police had "confirmed" it.[51] Leicester city police denied the claim quite emphatically.[52] But the misinformation continued to circulate on social media.[53] Also related was a Majid Freeman post, showing the picture of a man standing in front of a car, and claiming that he was an "RSS man" targeting Muslims, Sikhs, women and children.[53]
A British Pakistani influencer called "Dutch Raja" (Norman Khan from Birmingham),[3] who had 150,000 followers, posted the picture along with a poll asking, "Shall we go Saturday [to] teach these guys a lesson?"; 95% of the respondents voted yes. Thus, Saturday the 17th April was set as the date for Muslim mobilisation.[54][55]
The Hindus in East Leicester that were targeted as "RSS or BJP" men started fearing for their well-being. Some temporarily relocated to other locations; others refrained from venturing out for fear of being attacked. Some reported receiving stab wounds from the attacks during 4–6 September. One victim's mother told a TV reporter that she had experienced better Hindu–Muslim relations in Daman and Diu in India than she was finding in Leicester.[55][56]
The weekend 17–19 September, which was reserved for the funeral of Queen Elizabeth II, witnessed a large number of incidents which were described by the British press as "violent disorder".[57]
Saturday, 17 September, began with a peace march organised by Hindus to show solidarity with the victims of the violence in the preceding weeks. The march began on Belgrave Road (which continues on to Melton Road) and followed on to Green Lane Road in East Leicester. The march is said to have been conducted on foot paths, and was overseen by the local police.[58] Despite it being a supervised march, Muslims in East Leicester said they were intimidated and felt threatened.[59][60]
Three slogans were reportedly used by the protesters, Jai Shri Ram, Ganapati Bappa Moriya, and Vande Mataram,[61] of which only Jai Shri Ram was mentioned by the mainstream press.[62][63]
According to the police, a second "unplanned protest" was formed after this, by "groups of young men" (apparently Hindus, numbering about 200), proceeding towards Highfields.[64] According to Leicester Mercury, "an opposing group also gathered".[65] Police said it numbered 600–700 men (apparently Muslims). The police scrambled about 100 officers to keep the two groups apart.[66]
Both the sides shouted slogans, with the Hindus shouting Jai Shri Ram and Vande Mataram, and the Muslims shouting "Allah-o-Akbar".[67][68] Social media influencers as well as the mainstream press referenced only the Hindu protesters and emphasised Jai Shri Ram as possible evidence of Hindutva extremism.[69][70][71][72]
Uppingham Road, bordering North Evington
According to The Times of India, the trigger for these events was a poster created in Birmingham (following on from the fake news of kidnap and Dutch Raja's post), calling on Birmingham Muslims to participate in a protest in Leicester.[73]
The Hindus were angered by the poster as well as the fake social media claims regarding a kidnapping attempt by Hindu youth. They marched down the Belgrave Road in protest.[67] The two sides faced off somewhere on Belgrave Road, with the police trying to keep them apart.[67] The police issued a dispersal order at some point, which caused the crowds to move to other locations. A number of breakout incidents then occurred, continuing through the night, with calm being restored only the next morning.[74][57]
The most significant event of that night was the pulling down of a saffron flag from the wall of Shivalaya (Shiva temple) on Belgrave Road and an attempt to burn it.[67] According to a Hindu community leader, further desecration was blocked by an imam that stood guard.[75]
The police said that 16 police officers and a dog were injured during the events of that night.[76][77]
On Sunday, 18 September, the police got ready for handling further disturbances by recalling officers from Queen's funeral duties in London.[78]
An unauthorised protest was held by Muslims on this day, which is said to have been widely advertised on WhatsApp.[79] Police oversaw the march, which apparently concluded without any incident.[80] An Islamist preacher named Mohammed Hijab from London arrived in Leicester. He posted videos of himself inciting Muslims with anti-Hindu rhetoric and asking them to retaliate. The men agreed and chanted "Allah-o-Akbar".[81] According to reports, the police dispersed their march, but once again, disorder broke out at other locations, this time in North Evington.[79] Police put in place a temporary police cordon and arrested 15 people.[65][80]
On the whole, 47 people were arrested since the beginning of 28 August. Of these 11 people were reported to be from outside Leicester, one from Market Harborough, eight from Birmingham and two from London.[52]
The mayor of Leicester Sir Peter Soulsby said that the unrest was "fanned by some very distorted social media" and "a lot of people who came in from outside".[82][83]
Misinformation continued to flow on social media even during the weekend. One rumour said that Hindus had attacked a mosque. Despite the police debunking the claim, it continued to circulate on social media.[84] Another said that the Hindu temple in Ealing Road (London) arranged a bus from Angel Tours to transport Hindutva RSS members to Leicester to mobilise violence against Muslims.[85][52] The claim was debunked by a journalist of The Guardian.[86] Analysts also found anti-Muslim disinformation during the weekend, in particular a claim that a Hindu temple in Birmingham was burnt down, using images of an unrelated event.[87][52]
Birmingham events
Tensions continued into the following week, with the unrest spreading from Leicester to the Birmingham area on Tuesday 20 September. Video footage showed nearly 200 Muslim men surrounding the Durga Bhawan Temple in Smethwick, a neighbourhood where almost one-in-four residents are Asian, chanting 'Allahu Akbar'. They were voicing their anger at the temple for inviting a controversial Hindutva proponent, Sadhvi Rithambara, as a guest speaker.[88] One video showed a masked man with a Birmingham accent say "RSS speakers are not welcome in Birmingham, not welcome anywhere in the UK. None of your speakers, any of the hate speakers, we are going to turn up for all of them...we've got no issues with British Hindus, we grew up with them, we know all of them. But RSS, you'll be met by us every single time".[89]
Reactions
The surge in violence took many by surprise, and senior representatives of Leicester's Muslim and Hindu communities urged calm. On Tuesday 20 September, President of the ISKCON Leicester Hindu Temple, Pradip Gajjar, said he was "saddened and heartbroken to see the eruption of tension and violence."[90]
Labour MP Jonathan Ashworth critiqued the events as "shocking scenes of unacceptable incidents of violence," and that all "are united in calling for calm, peace and harmony."
Leicester East MP Claudia Webbe has called for cooler heads to prevail, urging strengthened "dialogue to repair community relations", while warning the violence "has the potential to spread to other areas...and has the potential to spread across the country".[91]
Rob Nixon, Acting Chief Police Constable for Leicestershire, has noted the investigation into the unrest will run for "several months" and that "the traditional community leaders, partners […] having a really detailed dialogue about some of these tensions, how we've got to where we are, and how we resolve them and take the issues forward."
Studies
The Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI) associated with the Rutgers University analysed the social media traffic during the clashes and reported that malicious narratives played an essential role in instigating the attacks.[92]
A report commissioned by the Henry Jackson Society claimed that the social media instigators were "Islamist radicals". It named the alleged influencers and provided their background[93][94][95][96][97][98] and reported on the fear Leicester's Hindu community felt during the riots and their helplessness in the face of the inadequate police response against the mobs. Their report was presented in Parliament.[99]
Delhi-based Centre for Democracy, Pluralism and Human Rights (CDPHR) produced a fact-finding report and zeroed in on the issue of "ethnic enclaves" in Leicester. It said that different religious groups were living in ethnic enclaves, with some ethnicities more "clubbed up" in some spaces more than others. The report claims that the ethnic enclaves gave rise to territorial tensions and localised majoritarianism. Their report was launched in the UK House of Commons.[100]
On 22 September, the mayor of Leicester, Sir Peter Soulsby, announced an independent review into the events of the unrest, which he said would be completed "within weeks".[101]
A month later Chris Allen of University of Leicester was named to head the review. The appointment was criticised by multiple groups, and the Hindu groups of Leicester said they would boycott the reivew.[102] Allen then declined to undertake the role.[103]
In May 2023, the UK government announced the formation of a panel for independent review headed by former Labour Party MP, Lord Ian Austin.[104] The other panel members are Samir Shah, a former commissioner for the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities, Hilary Pilkington of the University of Manchester, a Fellow of the UK Academy of Social Sciences, and Shaaz Mahboob of NHS England, a trustee of British Muslims for Secular Democracy.[105]
Concerns have been raised by Muslim organisations regarding the choice of Lord Austin over a previous social media post.[106] Lord Austin responded by stating that he was coming to the review with a completely open mind and that he genuinely wanted to help.[107]
A call for submissions of evidence was issued in May 2024.[108]
Mayor Peter Soulsby expressed his concerns that neither study would be seen as "truly impartial".[109]
Aftermath
Leicestershire Police continued investigations into the events of the unrest, employing a team of 50 officers. More than 100 incidents and 6,000 hours of video footage from body-worn cameras, CCTV and phone were investigated.[110]
A total of 73 people were detained by November 2022.[111][112]
As of September 2023[update], 32 people were convicted of offences including affray, threats to kill, racial or religious public order crimes and possession of weapons. 19 cases were still pending.[110]
Majid Freeman, who was repeatedly found to be spreading misinformation that instigated the violence, was convicted in June 2024 under section 4 of the Public Order Act 1986.[113][note 7]
In July, he was arrested and charged with "encouragement of terrorism and supporting a proscibed organisation" in unrelated incidents.[115] According to 5Pillars UK, the organisation is the Palestinian organisation Hamas.[116]
In the run-up to the 2023 Leicester City Council election, the Labour Party "deselected" a large number of its councillors, i.e., they would not get a Labour Party ticket for the election. The deselected councillors included 15 out of 26 councillors belonging to the Black, Asian or minority ethnic (BAME) communities. All of the Hindu councillors were deselected.[117][118]
These councillors either joined the Conservative Party or decided to run as independents. Through the election, the Labour Party saw its strength drop from 53 seats to 31 seats. The Conservative Party won 17 seats, up from 2 seats earlier. All three seats in Belgrave and three seats in North Evington went to the Conservatives.[119]
The Mayor's handling of the 2022 unrest was cited by many as the reason for these developments. According to one of the deselected councillors, Hindus and Muslims lost trust in the mayor Peter Soulsby, and all those that challenged his handling were deselected.[118] There were also moves to remove the elected mayoral model that had been in operation for 12 years, even though it was unsuccessful.[120][121]
^From the published accounts, it becomes clear that these immigrants included some Christians and possibly Jews as well.
^Daman and Diu are former Portuguese colonies in the Gujarat region of India. These immigrants were entitled to Portuguese passports and decided to move to Britain before the Brexit.[26]
^The police issued statement asserting that the incident continued to be under investigation in September. It was not until November that they made seven arrests in connection with this incident.[31]
^
The expression literally means "death to Pakistan", but as a slogan it would be interpreted as "down with Pakistan" in the subcontinent.[37][38] Moreover, in the context of a cricket match, the country names India and Pakistan would be used as references to the respective teams rather than the countries. However, social media posts in the following days as well as media reports interpreted the slogan as "death to Pakistan".[36][5][39]
^Even mainstream news organisations described the contents of the video as "ugly hostility"[43] or "ugly scenes".[39] Leicester Police claimed the videos showed "racist and hateful chanting",[44] and said they were treating it as a "hate crime".[35] Chris Blackburn, who co-authored an investigative report on the riots, pointed out that Leicester was no stranger to "cricket hooliganism", as very similar mob violence occurred after an India–Pakistan cricket match in 2017.[45]
^The coverage of this incident and others in the following days came from INSIGHT UK, a British Hindu and Indian organisation, often backed by video evidence. It claimed, "Amongst many incidents a Hindu home celebrating #GaneshChaturthi was attacked. Eggs were thrown into the house, attempted knifing of a young Hindu male and his aunt was punched on the nose when she came to save him."[46] Muslim groups made a counter-allegation that a Muslim youth was attacked on the grounds of an egg-throwing accusation. This was said to have been a second attack after the May incident, and later used in the social media campaigning.[48]
^Section 4 of the Public Order Act 1986 deals with threatening words or behaviour.[114]
^Andrews, A., ‘A history of South Asian migration into Leicester: an essay on Hindu/Muslim segregation’, in Jewson, N. (ed.), Migration Processes and Ethnic Divisions (Leicester: The Centre for Urban History and The Ethnicity Research Centre, University of Leicester, 1995)
^
Areeb Ullah, Leicester riots: How Hindutva nationalism pushed a city to the brink, Middle East Eye, 23 September 2022. "The RSS, or Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, is a paramilitary organisation set up in the early 1920s, modelled on the Italian fascist leader Benito Mussolini's Blackshirts, and which supports the Hindutva ideology and the establishment of a Hindu Rashtra."
^Leicester tensions have been simmering for 'months' says city MP, Yahoo! News, 20 September 2022. 'The [Federation of Muslim Organisations] strongly cautioned against using terms “like Hindutva”, which was “strictly related to this fascist extreme minority” because “such terms can demonise an entire community unfairly”.'
^
Majid Freeman, What caused the recent community tension in Leicester?, 5Pillars UK, 12 September 2022. "The RSS, or Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (National Volunteers Association), is a core organisation in the Hindutva (Hindu fascist) movement and network. It is widely known to be the parent organisation of India's current ruling party, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP, or Indian People's Party). It is, without a doubt, a fascist organisation that uses violence to eliminate India's religious minorities and caste oppressed people. It is Islamophobic, anti-Sikh, anti-Christian, anti-woman, and anti-Dalit."
^
Naomi Canton, No Hindutva or RSS extremism involved in Leicester violence: Report, The Times of India, 6 November 2022. 'One influencer with over 800,000 followers posted a video of himself leading a group through Leicester captioned "Muslim patrol in Leicester" and called on Muslims to "defend themselves against Hindu fascism".'
^
Barry Pavier, Hindutva and the Sangh Parivar in Britain, International Socialism, 14 January 2023. "Continuing to use the term “fascism” presents a barrier to understanding how Hindutva operates and what it seeks to do. Moreover, the characterisation of the RSS as fascist tends to be immediately followed by the conclusion that every other expression of Hindutva politics is a direct result of RSS activity. This methodology helped generate the claims that the Leicester violence was a result of RSS activity."
^ abcd
Singh, Hardeep (13 September 2022). "Leicester: multiculturalism turns violent". Spiked. On [6 September], an emergency meeting was held between representatives of Leicester's Hindu and Muslim communities. Since then, police patrols have continued in the areas affected, but further disturbances are still being reported.
^
Canton, Naomi (8 September 2022). "'Pakistan-origin youths' target Hindu areas in Leicester". The Times of India. ProQuest2711040258. In one video a PIO [Indian origin] family can be heard terrified in their homes watching the violence from their window as they take a video of the gangs wandering around parked cars shouting with weapons in hand. ... Members of the PIO community are now writing to their local MPs expressing concern.
^
Jahangir Akbar, Hindutva thugs and poor policing created chaos in Leicester on Saturday, 5Pillars UK, 18 September 2022. "Their presence whilst masked with balaclavas and chanting was unruly, intimidating and threatening. The mob disturbed the peace, created anxiety and caused significant, unneeded inconvenience in an already emotionally-charged situation."
^
Caroline Lowbridge, James Lynn, Dan Martin, Large-scale disorder breaks out in Leicester, BBC News, 18 September 2022. "A resident from Green Lane Road said what she witnessed on Saturday evening was "very intimidating". "The whole situation seemed really out of control," she said. "The police were there but it didn't seem like they had a great handle on things."
^
Aina J. Khan; Mark Brown (18 September 2022), "Police call for calm after 'serious disorder' breaks out in Leicester", The Guardian, archived from the original on 18 September 2022, Rukhsana Hussain, 42, a community leader, described hearing loud chants of "Jai Shri Ram", which translates from Hindi as "hail Lord Ram" or "victory to Lord Ram", from several streets away. This traditional Hindu greeting or chant has increasingly been appropriated by perpetrators of anti-Muslim violence in India, whose prime minister, Narendra Modi, is under growing scrutiny for the treatment of minorities, including Muslims. [Footnote:] This article was amended on 20 September 2022 to distinguish between the routine use of "Jai Shri Ram" for a greeting or religious observance, and its adoption by perpetrators of anti-Muslim violence in India.
^
Connolly, John (18 September 2022). "Why is violence breaking out in Leicester?". The Spectator. On Saturday a large group of Hindu men protested in the city, with some shouting 'Jai Shri Ram' – a slogan which has increasingly been used by Hindu nationalists in India.
^
Adam Moss, What led to the ugly scenes of violence and disorder in Leicester?, Leicester Mercury, 19 September 2022. "A number of calls came in Leicestershire Police reporting around 200 people had gathered in the east of the city for an unauthorised protest. All local officers available were scrambled to the scene immediately and tried to engage with those who had gathered, while extra police resources were drafted in."
^Littlewood, Hindu-Muslim civil unrest in Leicester (2022), p. 17: "Influencers asserted that ‘Jai Shri Ram’ was indicative of extremism which was reflected in mainstream press putting emphasis on the chanting of Jai Shri Ram as possible evidence of extremism.".
^
Connolly, John (18 September 2022). "Why is violence breaking out in Leicester?". The Spectator. On Saturday a large group of Hindu men protested in the city, with some shouting 'Jai Shri Ram' – a slogan which has increasingly been used by Hindu nationalists in India.
^
Aina J. Khan; Mark Brown (18 September 2022), "Police call for calm after 'serious disorder' breaks out in Leicester", The Guardian, archived from the original on 18 September 2022, ["Jai Shri Ram"] is a chant that has recently become synonymous with anti-Muslim violence in India, where India's prime minister, Narendra Modi, is under increasing scrutiny for the treatment of minorities, including Muslims in the country.
^"Leicester: Call for calm after Hindu-Muslim unrest in UK city", Al Jazeera, 20 September 2022 (Headlined under "Islamophobia") "On Saturday night, a crowd of about 200 Hindu men marched in the city, with some shouting – “Jai Shri Ram” (Hail Lord Ram) – a war cry for far-right Hindus in India. Soon Muslims came out on the streets leading to scuffles."
^
Naomi Canton, Temple targeted, cops hit in East Leicester flare-up, Times of India, 19 September 2022. 'The poster says: "We going to land in Lesta [to] show these RSS Hindutva extremist not to mess with our Muslim and Sikh women, children and elderly (sic)."'
^Leicester: Call for calm after Hindu-Muslim unrest in UK city, Al Jazeera, 20 September 2022. '“I'm really proud to say on that day, when the flag was removed, there was an imam outside. He said I'm standing outside the mandir [temple], making sure nothing happens,” Lakhani was quoted as saying by the Guardian.'
