Hello, Offside Trap, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:54, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-09-22T14:54:00.000Z","author":"Walter G\u00f6rlitz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Walter_G\u00f6rlitz-2014-09-22T14:54:00.000Z-Welcome!","replies":[]}}-->
As for notability, the NY Times article does support notability for the numbers, but that's not the reference used in the supporters section of the club article: it's a self-published source. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:55, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-09-22T14:55:00.000Z","author":"Walter G\u00f6rlitz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Walter_G\u00f6rlitz-2014-09-22T14:55:00.000Z-Welcome!","replies":["c-Offside_Trap-2014-09-22T19:06:00.000Z-Walter_G\u00f6rlitz-2014-09-22T14:55:00.000Z"]}}-->
- Thanks for the help! I just want to understand; if the WSJ article was referenced in the NYCFC article as well as the Third Rail article, then notability isn't an issue and self-published isn't a problem? Offside Trap (talk) 19:06, 22 September 2014 (UTC)Offside Trap[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-09-22T19:06:00.000Z","author":"Offside Trap","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Offside_Trap-2014-09-22T19:06:00.000Z-Walter_G\u00f6rlitz-2014-09-22T14:55:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
