This is an archive of past discussions with User:Iazyges. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Thank you for article improvements in February! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:28, 28 February 2019 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-02-28T13:28:00.000Z","author":"Gerda Arendt","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gerda_Arendt-2019-02-28T13:28:00.000Z-we_thank_you","replies":[]}}-->
And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2. With 56 contestants qualifying, each group in Round 2 contains seven contestants, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for Round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining contestants.
Our top scorers in Round 1 were:
L293D, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with ten good articles on submarines for a total of 357 points.
Adam Cuerden, a WikiCup veteran, came next with 274 points, mostly from eight featured pictures, restorations of artwork.
MPJ-DK, a wrestling enthusiast, was in third place with 263 points, garnered from a featured list, five good articles, two DYKs and four GARs.
Usernameunique came next at 243, with a featured article and a good article, both on ancient helmets.
Ed! was also on 224, with an amazing number of good article reviews (56 actually).
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews on 143 good articles, one hundred more than the number of good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Well done all!
Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.
Richard III of England, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ——SerialNumber5412917:04, 4 March 2019 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-03-04T17:04:00.000Z","author":"Serial Number 54129","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Serial_Number_54129-2019-03-04T17:04:00.000Z-GA_reassessment","replies":[],"displayName":"\u2014\u2014"}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-03-04T21:13:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Administrators'_newsletter_\u2013_March_2019-2019-03-04T21:13:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-03-04T21:13:00.000Z-Administrators'_newsletter_\u2013_March_2019"],"uneditableSection":true,"text":"Administrators' newsletter \u2013 March 2019","linkableTitle":"Administrators' newsletter \u2013 March 2019"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-03-04T21:13:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Administrators'_newsletter_\u2013_March_2019-2019-03-04T21:13:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-03-04T21:13:00.000Z-Administrators'_newsletter_\u2013_March_2019"],"uneditableSection":true,"text":"Administrators' newsletter \u2013 March 2019","linkableTitle":"Administrators' newsletter \u2013 March 2019"}-->
Following discussions at the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and Wikipedia talk:Administrators, an earlier change to the restoration of adminship policy was reverted. If requested, bureaucrats will not restore administrator permissions removed due to inactivity if there have been five years without a logged administrator action; this "five year rule" does not apply to permissions removed voluntarily.
Technical news
A new tool is available to help determine if a given IP is an open proxy/VPN/webhost/compromised host.
Arbitration
The Arbitration Committee announced two new OTRS queues. Both are meant solely for cases involving private information; other cases will continue to be handled at the appropriate venues (e.g., WP:COIN or WP:SPI).
paid-en-wpwikipedia.org has been set up to receive private evidence related to abusive paid editing.
checkuser-en-wpwikipedia.org has been set up to receive private requests for CheckUser. For instance, requests for IP block exemption for anonymous proxy editing should now be sent to this address instead of the functionaries-en list.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-03-04T21:13:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-03-04T21:13:00.000Z-Administrators'_newsletter_\u2013_March_2019","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Nick-D-2019-03-10T11:00:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-The_Bugle:_Issue_CLV,_March_2019-2019-03-10T11:00:00.000Z","replies":["c-Nick-D-2019-03-10T11:00:00.000Z-The_Bugle:_Issue_CLV,_March_2019"],"uneditableSection":true,"text":"The Bugle: Issue CLV, March 2019","linkableTitle":"The Bugle: Issue CLV, March 2019"}-->
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:00, 10 March 2019 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-03-10T11:00:00.000Z","author":"Nick-D","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Nick-D-2019-03-10T11:00:00.000Z-The_Bugle:_Issue_CLV,_March_2019","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Trizek_(WMF)-2019-03-11T08:37:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Please_participate_to_the_talk_pages_consultation-2019-03-11T08:37:00.000Z","replies":["c-Trizek_(WMF)-2019-03-11T08:37:00.000Z-Please_participate_to_the_talk_pages_consultation"],"uneditableSection":true,"text":"Please participate to the talk pages consultation","linkableTitle":"Please participate to the talk pages consultation"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Trizek_(WMF)-2019-03-11T08:37:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Please_participate_to_the_talk_pages_consultation-2019-03-11T08:37:00.000Z","replies":["c-Trizek_(WMF)-2019-03-11T08:37:00.000Z-Please_participate_to_the_talk_pages_consultation"],"uneditableSection":true,"text":"Please participate to the talk pages consultation","linkableTitle":"Please participate to the talk pages consultation"}-->
Hello
Our team at the Wikimedia Foundation is working on a project to improve the ease-of-use and productivity of wiki talk pages. As a Teahouse host, I can imagine you’ve run into challenges explaining talk pages to first-time participants.
We want all contributors to be able to talk to each other on the wikis – to ask questions, to resolve differences, to organize projects and to make decisions. Communication is essential for the depth and quality of our content, and the health of our communities. We're currently leading a global consultation on how to improve talk pages, and we're looking for people that can report on their experiences using (or helping other people to use) wiki talk pages. We'd like to invite you to participate in the consultation, and invite new users to join too.
We thank you in advance for your participation and your help.
Trizek (WMF), 08:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-03-11T08:37:00.000Z","author":"Trizek (WMF)","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Trizek_(WMF)-2019-03-11T08:37:00.000Z-Please_participate_to_the_talk_pages_consultation","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Trizek_(WMF)-2019-03-11T08:48:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Please_participate_to_the_talk_pages_consultation_-_link_update-2019-03-11T08:48:00.000Z","replies":["c-Trizek_(WMF)-2019-03-11T08:48:00.000Z-Please_participate_to_the_talk_pages_consultation_-_link_update"],"uneditableSection":true,"text":"Please participate to the talk pages consultation - link update","linkableTitle":"Please participate to the talk pages consultation - link update"}-->
Please participate to the talk pages consultation - link update
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Trizek_(WMF)-2019-03-11T08:48:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Please_participate_to_the_talk_pages_consultation_-_link_update-2019-03-11T08:48:00.000Z","replies":["c-Trizek_(WMF)-2019-03-11T08:48:00.000Z-Please_participate_to_the_talk_pages_consultation_-_link_update"],"uneditableSection":true,"text":"Please participate to the talk pages consultation - link update","linkableTitle":"Please participate to the talk pages consultation - link update"}-->
The previous message about the talk pages consultation has a broken link.
Sorry for the inconvenience, Trizek (WMF), 08:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-03-11T08:48:00.000Z","author":"Trizek (WMF)","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Trizek_(WMF)-2019-03-11T08:48:00.000Z-Please_participate_to_the_talk_pages_consultation_-_link_update","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-CASSIOPEIA-2019-03-11T11:24:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Biography_of_living_person-2019-03-11T11:24:00.000Z","replies":["c-CASSIOPEIA-2019-03-11T11:24:00.000Z-Biography_of_living_person"],"uneditableSection":true,"text":"Biography of living person","linkableTitle":"Biography of living person"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-CASSIOPEIA-2019-03-11T11:24:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Biography_of_living_person-2019-03-11T11:24:00.000Z","replies":["c-CASSIOPEIA-2019-03-11T11:24:00.000Z-Biography_of_living_person"],"uneditableSection":true,"text":"Biography of living person","linkableTitle":"Biography of living person"}-->
H Iazyges, greetings to you and I am here to seek advice. I revert an edit - see HERE-1 as the edit was unsourced. I later received a request to delete the certain personal content HERE-2 of Jamie Moyer. The some of the existing sources led to no were or do not backup the contain claimed, but I could find many independent reliable sources indication of they married. My understanding is content could be included as long as it is well sources and not controversial/harm to the subject of the article as per WP:Biographies of living persons and it is not decision of the subject of the article decision (pls let me know if my understanding is incorrect). If the sources could be found (not from the requester's sending a a copy of the divorce paper), then the deleted content (the divorce) could be included with source. Question - If the personal info is not a controversial topic but well-sourced, can the content be deleted? (My thought is the content could stay in the page). Pls advise and thanks in advance. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk)11:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-03-11T11:24:00.000Z","author":"CASSIOPEIA","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-CASSIOPEIA-2019-03-11T11:24:00.000Z-Biography_of_living_person","replies":[]}}-->
The WMF has announced that Google Translate is now available for translating articles through the content translation tool. This may result in an increase in machine translated articles in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to use the {{rough translation}} tag and gently remind (or inform) editors that translations from other language Wikipedia pages still require attribution per WP:TFOLWP.
Discussions of interest
Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.
NPP Tools Report
Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828 Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Hello and welcome to the March newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since December 2018. All being well, we're planning to issue these quarterly in 2019, balancing the need to communicate widely with the avoidance of filling up talk pages. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.
January Drive: Thanks to everyone for the splendid work in January's Backlog Elimination Drive. We removed copyedit tags from all of the articles tagged in our original target months of June, July and August 2018, and by 24 January we ran out of articles. After adding September, we finished the month with 8 target articles remaining and 842 left in the backlog. GOCE copyeditors also completed 48 requests for copyedit in January. Of the 31 people who signed up for this drive, 24 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.
Blitz: Thanks to everyone who participated in the February Blitz. Of the 15 people who signed up, 13 copyedited at least one article. Participants claimed 32 copyedits, including 15 requests. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.
Progress report: As of 23:39, 18 March 2019 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 108 requests since 1 January and the backlog stands at 851 articles.
March Drive: The month-long March drive is now underway; the target months are October and November 2018. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one article from the backlog. Sign up here!
Election reminder: It may only be March but don't forget our mid-year Election of Coordinators opens for nominations on 1 June. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here.
Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Miniapolis, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, Reidgreg and Tdslk.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
