I'm going to remove the link to high holiday seats and I just want to explain myself here since the feeling is not universal. Right now there is no page with that name, all it is is a redirect to High_Holidays#High_Holiday_seats. Since there is already a link to high Holidays there is no reason to be redundant. Should the seating issue ever become a full article on it's own, (right now it's clearly better off where it is since it isn't an independent subject), then I would not object to having a link to it in this template. Right now though the link is just redundant. Remember - nothing in wikipedia is permanent - if it becomes a full article then we can change the template then. Right now it doesn't serve a purpose. --Bachrach44 (talk) 17:48, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-09-21T17:48:00.000Z","author":"Bachrach44","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bachrach44-2008-09-21T17:48:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
The second issue is that the section on high holiday seats right now is completely unreferenced, has many things which are untrue, and represents a single POV. I'm going to try to do some cleanup but frankly it's going to need more.--Bachrach44 (talk) 17:48, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-09-21T17:48:00.000Z","author":"Bachrach44","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bachrach44-2008-09-21T17:48:00.000Z-1","replies":[]}}-->
