Template talk:Canon EF lenses

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-130.232.144.221-2007-07-27T06:32:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Canon_lens_galore-2007-07-27T06:32:00.000Z","replies":["c-130.232.144.221-2007-07-27T06:32:00.000Z-Canon_lens_galore"],"text":"Canon lens galore","linkableTitle":"Canon lens galore"}-->

Canon lens galore

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-130.232.144.221-2007-07-27T06:32:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Canon_lens_galore-2007-07-27T06:32:00.000Z","replies":["c-130.232.144.221-2007-07-27T06:32:00.000Z-Canon_lens_galore"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-130.232.144.221-2007-07-27T06:32:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Canon_lens_galore-2007-07-27T06:32:00.000Z","replies":["c-130.232.144.221-2007-07-27T06:32:00.000Z-Canon_lens_galore"],"text":"Canon lens galore","linkableTitle":"Canon lens galore"}-->

Rather than truckloads of articles on canon lenses, would not a couple of detailed lists be enough? (for example one list for macro lenses, one for ultra wide angle, wide angle, normal etc etc). 130.232.144.221 06:32, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-07-27T06:32:00.000Z","author":"130.232.144.221","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-130.232.144.221-2007-07-27T06:32:00.000Z-Canon_lens_galore","replies":["c-Megapixie-2007-07-27T07:23:00.000Z-130.232.144.221-2007-07-27T06:32:00.000Z","c-Epgui-2011-05-13T00:27:00.000Z-130.232.144.221-2007-07-27T06:32:00.000Z"]}}-->

I would tend to concur. There isn't that much you can say about a lense that you couldn't in a list article. There is already a list on EF Mount. It's possible some lenses might be worth comment (i.e. 1200 mm f/5.6, 50 mm f/1.0) - but I think outside of that it's just going to be elements and groups. Megapixie 07:23, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-07-27T07:23:00.000Z","author":"Megapixie","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Megapixie-2007-07-27T07:23:00.000Z-130.232.144.221-2007-07-27T06:32:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
I don't think so... I like how every class of lens has it's own article. Some of them have enough history to warrant an article by themselves imho. — Guillaume Pelletier ~ 00:27, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-05-13T00:27:00.000Z","author":"Epgui","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Epgui-2011-05-13T00:27:00.000Z-130.232.144.221-2007-07-27T06:32:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Guillaume Pelletier"}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-121.45.203.191-2011-05-20T10:09:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-\"Distorting_Lenses\"-2011-05-20T10:09:00.000Z","replies":["c-121.45.203.191-2011-05-20T10:09:00.000Z-\"Distorting_Lenses\""],"text":"\"Distorting Lenses\"","linkableTitle":"\"Distorting Lenses\""}-->

"Distorting Lenses"

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-121.45.203.191-2011-05-20T10:09:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-\"Distorting_Lenses\"-2011-05-20T10:09:00.000Z","replies":["c-121.45.203.191-2011-05-20T10:09:00.000Z-\"Distorting_Lenses\""]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-121.45.203.191-2011-05-20T10:09:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-\"Distorting_Lenses\"-2011-05-20T10:09:00.000Z","replies":["c-121.45.203.191-2011-05-20T10:09:00.000Z-\"Distorting_Lenses\""],"text":"\"Distorting Lenses\"","linkableTitle":"\"Distorting Lenses\""}-->

All lenses distort the image, just in different ways. For instance, a "standard" rectilinear lens preserves straight lines but can only achieve that by distorting circles, while a fisheye lens preserves circles but must distort straight lines to do so. This category is poorly named and fisheye lenses should be in a category of their own. Some manufacturers have produced multiple soft focus/defocus lenses so I don't see why this can't also be a separate category. 121.45.203.191 (talk) 10:09, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-05-20T10:09:00.000Z","author":"121.45.203.191","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-121.45.203.191-2011-05-20T10:09:00.000Z-\"Distorting_Lenses\"","replies":["c-121.45.203.191-2011-05-20T10:12:00.000Z-121.45.203.191-2011-05-20T10:09:00.000Z"]}}-->

I should add that tilt/shift lenses could equally be called "distorting". 121.45.203.191 (talk) 10:12, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-05-20T10:12:00.000Z","author":"121.45.203.191","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-121.45.203.191-2011-05-20T10:12:00.000Z-121.45.203.191-2011-05-20T10:09:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-GodeNehler-2016-05-11T04:48:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Which_category_for_the_new_Canon_EF-M_28mm_Macro_lens?-2016-05-11T04:48:00.000Z","replies":["c-GodeNehler-2016-05-11T04:48:00.000Z-Which_category_for_the_new_Canon_EF-M_28mm_Macro_lens?"],"text":"Which category for the new Canon EF-M 28mm Macro lens?","linkableTitle":"Which category for the new Canon EF-M 28mm Macro lens?"}-->

Which category for the new Canon EF-M 28mm Macro lens?

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-GodeNehler-2016-05-11T04:48:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Which_category_for_the_new_Canon_EF-M_28mm_Macro_lens?-2016-05-11T04:48:00.000Z","replies":["c-GodeNehler-2016-05-11T04:48:00.000Z-Which_category_for_the_new_Canon_EF-M_28mm_Macro_lens?"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-GodeNehler-2016-05-11T04:48:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Which_category_for_the_new_Canon_EF-M_28mm_Macro_lens?-2016-05-11T04:48:00.000Z","replies":["c-GodeNehler-2016-05-11T04:48:00.000Z-Which_category_for_the_new_Canon_EF-M_28mm_Macro_lens?"],"text":"Which category for the new Canon EF-M 28mm Macro lens?","linkableTitle":"Which category for the new Canon EF-M 28mm Macro lens?"}-->

Hi, I have add the new Canon EF-M 28mm Macro lens. Basically I have put it to EF-M primes and Macro lens. Is this a good idea, or should it only in one category? And if only in one, main question: in which one? --GodeNehler (talk) 04:48, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-05-11T04:48:00.000Z","author":"GodeNehler","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-GodeNehler-2016-05-11T04:48:00.000Z-Which_category_for_the_new_Canon_EF-M_28mm_Macro_lens?","replies":[]}}-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-GodeNehler-2019-02-07T11:39:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-New_Canon_RF_Lenses-2019-02-07T11:39:00.000Z","replies":["c-GodeNehler-2019-02-07T11:39:00.000Z-New_Canon_RF_Lenses"],"text":"New Canon RF Lenses","linkableTitle":"New Canon RF Lenses"}-->

New Canon RF Lenses

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-GodeNehler-2019-02-07T11:39:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-New_Canon_RF_Lenses-2019-02-07T11:39:00.000Z","replies":["c-GodeNehler-2019-02-07T11:39:00.000Z-New_Canon_RF_Lenses"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-GodeNehler-2019-02-07T11:39:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-New_Canon_RF_Lenses-2019-02-07T11:39:00.000Z","replies":["c-GodeNehler-2019-02-07T11:39:00.000Z-New_Canon_RF_Lenses"],"text":"New Canon RF Lenses","linkableTitle":"New Canon RF Lenses"}-->

Question: Should we put the new Canon RF Lenses, or should we create a new Template? --GodeNehler (talk) 11:39, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-02-07T11:39:00.000Z","author":"GodeNehler","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-GodeNehler-2019-02-07T11:39:00.000Z-New_Canon_RF_Lenses","replies":["c-2A02:6D40:3084:3400:A1DB:2EE2:A688:BA3C-20240814170900-GodeNehler-2019-02-07T11:39:00.000Z","c-2A02:6D40:30D5:4800:A07E:77E2:4EA7:4455-20240921104100-GodeNehler-2019-02-07T11:39:00.000Z"]}}-->

Would be great to add them. 2A02:6D40:3084:3400:A1DB:2EE2:A688:BA3C (talk) 17:09, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240814170900","author":"2A02:6D40:3084:3400:A1DB:2EE2:A688:BA3C","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-2A02:6D40:3084:3400:A1DB:2EE2:A688:BA3C-20240814170900-GodeNehler-2019-02-07T11:39:00.000Z","replies":["c-GodeNehler-20240815204900-2A02:6D40:3084:3400:A1DB:2EE2:A688:BA3C-20240814170900"]}}-->
See Canon RF lens mount --GodeNehler (talk) 20:49, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240815204900","author":"GodeNehler","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-GodeNehler-20240815204900-2A02:6D40:3084:3400:A1DB:2EE2:A688:BA3C-20240814170900","replies":[]}}-->
As EF-M is in the same template we should add them to the template. 2A02:6D40:30D5:4800:A07E:77E2:4EA7:4455 (talk) 10:41, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240921104100","author":"2A02:6D40:30D5:4800:A07E:77E2:4EA7:4455","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-2A02:6D40:30D5:4800:A07E:77E2:4EA7:4455-20240921104100-GodeNehler-2019-02-07T11:39:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Strategi Solo vs Squad di Free Fire: Cara Menang Mudah!