2011 United States Supreme Court case
Talk America, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co. |
---|
|
|
Full case name | Talk America, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co. DBA AT&T Michigan |
---|
Docket no. | 10-313 |
---|
Citations | 564 U.S. 50 (more) |
---|
Argument | Oral argument |
---|
Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
---|
|
Prior | Michigan Public Service Commission decision reversed sub nom. Mich. Bell Tel. Co. v. Lark, 2007 WL 2868633 (E.D. Mich. 2007); affirmed sub nom. Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Covad Communications Co., 597 F.3d 370 (6th Cir. 2010); cert. granted, 562 U.S. 1104 (2010). |
---|
|
The Federal Communications Commission had advanced a reasonable interpretation of its regulations in a dispute with AT&T. |
|
- Chief Justice
- John Roberts
- Associate Justices
- Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
|
|
Majority | Thomas, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor |
---|
Concurrence | Scalia |
---|
Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. |
Talk America, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., 564 U.S. 50 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) had advanced a reasonable interpretation of its regulations in a dispute with AT&T.[1]
See also
References
- ^ Talk America, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co. Syllabus p. 2 "Held: The FCC has advanced a reasonable interpretation of its regulations—i.e., that to satisfy its duty under §251(c)(2), an incumbent LEC must make its existing entrance facilities available to competitors at cost-based rates if the facilities are to be used for interconnection—and this Court defers to the FCC's views."
External links