Schlagenhauf v. Holder

Schlagenhauf v. Holder
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 23, 1964
Full case name	Schlagenhauf v. Holder
Citations	379 U.S. 104 (more)
Holding
Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows courts to order a defendant to submit to a medical examination.
Court membership
Chief Justice Earl Warren Associate Justices Hugo Black · William O. Douglas Tom C. Clark · John M. Harlan II William J. Brennan Jr. · Potter Stewart Byron White · Arthur Goldberg
Case opinions
Majority	Goldberg, joined by Warren, Brennan, Stewart, White
Concur/dissent	Black, joined by Clark
Concur/dissent	Douglass
Dissent	Harlan II

Schlagenhauf v. Holder, 379 U.S. 104 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows courts to order a defendant to submit to a medical examination.^[1][2] The case came to stand for the notion that mandamus can be appropriate when there is a recurring dispute over interpretations of the Rules.^[3]

References

1. Schlagenhauf v. Holder, 379 U.S. 104 (1964)
2. Mishkin, Paul J. (1965). "The Supreme Court, 1964 Term". Harvard Law Review. 79 (1): 168–170. doi:10.2307/1338859. ISSN 0017-811X.
3. Salpeter, Alan N.; Salomon, Richard A.; Jacobs, Caryn (1987). "Discovery from Those at the Top". Litigation. 13 (4): 18. ISSN 0097-9813.

External links

• Text of Schlagenhauf v. Holder, 379 U.S. 104 (1964) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia