These began with the Reform Acts of 1832, 1867, and 1884, to increase the electorate for the House of Commons and remove certain inequalities in representation. The bill of 1832 disfranchised many boroughs which enjoyed undue representation and increased that of the large towns, at the same time extending the franchise. It was put through Parliament by the Whigs. The bill of 1867 was passed by the Conservatives under the urging of the Liberals, while that of 1882 was introduced by the Liberals and passed in 1884. These latter two bills provided for a more democratic representation.
Following the First World War, the Reform Act 1918 was enacted with cross-party unanimity. It enfranchised all men over the age of 21 and women over the age of 30. Ten years later, the Reform Act 1928, passed by the Conservatives, resulted in universal suffrage with a voting age of 21. In 1969, the United Kingdom became the first major democratic country to lower its age of franchise to 18 in the Reform Act 1969 passed by the Labour government.
In the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, before 1832, fewer than one adult male in ten was eligible to vote in parliamentary elections.[1] Moreover, the franchise varied a great deal between England (which included Wales), where it was wider, and Scotland and Ireland, where it was narrower.[2][3] A few boroughs gave the vote to all male householders, but many parliamentary seats were under the control of a small group or sometimes a single rich aristocrat. Reforms had been proposed in the 18th century, both by radicals such as John Wilkes and by more conservative politicians such as William Pitt the Younger. However, there was strong opposition to reform, especially after the outbreak of the French Revolution (1789–1799). The cause was continued after 1792 by the London Corresponding Society.
Eventually, the parliamentary franchise was expanded and made more uniform through a series of Reform Acts beginning with the Great Reform Act in 1832.[4] These acts extended voting rights to previously disenfranchised citizens. Sources refer to up to six "Reform Acts",[5][6][7] although the earlier three in 1832, 1867/68 and 1884, are better known by this name.[note 1] Some other acts related to electoral matters also became known as Reform Acts.[12][13][note 2]
The following Acts of Parliament are known as Reform Acts:
Reform Act 1832 (often called the "Great Reform Act" or "First Reform Act"),[14] which applied to England and Wales and gave representation to previously underrepresented urban areas and extended the qualifications for voting.
Reform Act 1884 (also called the "Third Reform Act"),[16] which allowed people in counties to vote on the same basis as those in towns. Home ownership was the only qualification.
Redistribution of Seats Act 1885 (sometimes called the "Reform Act 1885"),[12][13] which split most multi-member constituencies into multiple single-member ones.
Reform Act 1918 (also called the "Fourth Reform Act"),[17][18] which abolished property qualifications for men and introduced limited female suffrage, for women over the age of 30.
Reform Act 1928 (also called the "Fifth Reform Act"),[19][20] which widened suffrage by giving women electoral equality with men.
Reform Act 1969 (also called the "Sixth Reform Act"),[5][6][7] which lowered the minimum voting age from 21 to 18.
The 1832 Reform Act for England and Wales was the most controversial of the electoral reform acts passed by the Parliament. Similar Acts were passed the same year for Scotland, and Ireland. They were put through Parliament by the Whigs. The Acts reapportioned Parliament in a way fairer to the cities of the old industrial north, which had experienced tremendous growth. The Act also did away with most of the "rotten" and "pocket" boroughs such as Old Sarum, which with only seven voters, all controlled by the local squire, was still sending two members to Parliament. This act re-apportioned representation in Parliament, thus making that body more accurately represent the citizens of the country geographically (although still with no party-proportional balance), but also gave the power of voting to those lower in the social and economic scale, for the act extended the right to vote (in the boroughs) to any long-term holders of tenements of at least £10 annual value, adding 217,000 voters to an electorate of 435,000. Annual value here refers to the income that the land could be expected to earn if let, in a year.[28] As many as one man in five, though by some estimates still only one in seven, now had the right to vote.[1]
The agitation preceding and following the First Reform Act made many people consider fundamental issues of society and politics. The bill allowed the middle classes to share power with the upper classes; for many conservatives, this was revolutionary. Some historians argue that this transfer of power achieved in Britain and Ireland what the French Revolution of 1848 eventually achieved in France.
Charles Dickens observed these events at first hand as a shorthand Parliamentary reporter. The novel Middlemarch, by Mary Ann Evans (George Eliot) is set in the 1830s and mentions the struggle over the Reform Bills, though not as a major topic. Eliot's Felix Holt, the Radical, set in 1832, is a novel explicitly about the Great Reform Act.
The Chartists campaigned from 1838 for a wider reform. The movement petered out in the 1850s, but achieved most of its demands in the longer run. Legislative bills were introduced by the Conservatives under the urging of the Liberals. The 1867/8 Acts for England and Wales, Scotland, and Ireland extended the right to vote still further down the class ladder. In England and Wales, the reforms added just short of a million voters, including many workingmen, which doubled the electorate to almost two million.[1]
Like the Great Reform Act before it, the Second Reform Act also created major shock waves in contemporary British culture. In works such as Matthew Arnold's Culture and Anarchy and John Ruskin's The Crown of Wild Olive, contemporary authors debated whether the shift of power would create democracy that would, in turn, destroy high culture.
A further Reform Bill was introduced in 1882 by the Liberals. The Conservative-dominated Lords passed it in 1884, opening the way for its royal proclamation, becoming the Third Reform Act. It was the first electoral reform act to apply to the United Kingdom as a whole. Only with this Act did a majority of adult males gain the right to vote in parliamentary elections. Along with the 1885 Redistribution Act, this tripled the electorate again, giving the vote to most agricultural laborers. (Women were still barred from voting.)[1]
By the end of the 19th century and in they early 20th century, voting was coming to be regarded as a right rather than the property of the privileged but the First World War delayed further reforms. After the War, women were granted voting rights with cross-party unanimity in the Act of 1918, the Fourth Reform Act, which enfranchised all men aged over 21 and women over 30. This last piece of gender discrimination was eliminated 10 years later by the Equal Franchise Act 1928, the Fifth Reform Act, passed by the Conservatives.[1]
The voting age was lowered in 1969 by the Labour government in the Sixth Reform Act, making Britain the first major democratic nation to extend voting rights to all adults aged 18 or over.[29][30][31]
The periodic redrawing of constituency boundaries is now dealt with by a permanent Boundary Commission in each part of the United Kingdom, rather than a Reform Act.[32]
^Dawson, Michael (25 March 2010). "Money and the real impact of the Fourth Reform Act". The Historical Journal. 35 (2): 369–381. doi:10.1017/S0018246X0002584X. S2CID155070834.
^Loughran, Thomas; Mycock, Andrew; Tonge, Jonathan (3 November 2021). "Lowering the voting age: three lessons from the 1969 Representation of the People's Act". British Politics and Policy at LSE. Retrieved 31 December 2022. 'Votes at 18' was the last major extension of the UK franchise and is therefore an important element of the history of UK democracy from the 1832 Great Reform Act onwards.
Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson. "Why did the West extend the franchise? Democracy, inequality, and growth in historical perspective." Quarterly Journal of Economics 115.4 (2000): 1167–1199. online
Aidt, Toke S., and Raphaël Franck. "How to get the snowball rolling and extend the franchise: voting on the Great Reform Act of 1832." Public Choice 155 (2013): 229–250. online
Berlinski, Samuel, and Torun Dewan. "The political consequences of franchise extension: Evidence from the second reform act." Quarterly Journal of Political Science 6.34 (2011): 329–376. online
Brown, Richard. "The Reform Acts". in Church and State in Modern Britain 1700-1850 (Routledge. 1991). Pages 220 to 227.
Briggs, Asa England in The Age of Improvement, 1783-1867 (2nd ed. 1979) online
Cannon, John. Parliamentary Reform 1640-1832 (Cambridge University Press, 1973) online.
Conacher. The Emergence of British Parliamentary Democracy in the Nineteenth Century: The Passing of the Reform Acts of 1832, 1867, and 1884-1885. (Major Issues in History). (John Wiley and Sons. 1971) online also at Google Books.
Evans, Eric J. Parliamentary reform in Britain, c. 1770-1918 (Longman, 1999)
Himmelfarb, Gertrude. "The politics of democracy: the English Reform Act of 1867." Journal of British Studies 6.1 (1966): 97–138. doi:10.1086/38552
Pugh, Martin. The evolution of the British electoral system, 1832-1987 (Historical Association, 1988) online
Vernon, James. Politics and the people : a study in English political culture, c. 1815-1867 (Cambridge University Press, 1993) online
Whitfield, Bob. The Extension of the franchise, 1832-1931 (Heinemann, 2001) online .
Woodward, Llewellan. The Age of Reform, 1815–1870 (2nd ed. 1962) online