2023 United States Supreme Court case
Ohio Adjutant General's Department v. Federal Labor Relations Authority |
---|
|
|
Full case name | Ohio Adjutant General's Department v. Federal Labor Relations Authority |
---|
Docket no. | 21-1454 |
---|
Citations | 598 U.S. ___ (more) |
---|
|
The Federal Labor Relations Authority had jurisdiction over a State National Guard labor dispute because a state National Guard acts as a federal agency for the purpose of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute when it hires and supervises dual-status technicians serving in their civilian role. |
|
- Chief Justice
- John Roberts
- Associate Justices
- Clarence Thomas · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan Neil Gorsuch · Brett Kavanaugh Amy Coney Barrett · Ketanji Brown Jackson
|
|
Majority | Thomas |
---|
Dissent | Alito, joined by Gorsuch |
---|
Ohio Adjutant General's Department v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, 598 U.S. ___ (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Federal Labor Relations Authority had jurisdiction over a state National Guard labor dispute because a state National Guard acts as a federal agency for the purpose of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute when it hires and supervises dual-status technicians serving in their civilian role.[1][2]
See also
References
External links
- Text of Ohio Adjutant General's Department v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, No. 21-1454, 598 U.S. ___ (2023) is available from: Justia
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "[T]he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)