Ned Kelly and his gang hold up the hotel at Jerilderie. They retreat to a hideout where they are visited by "The Roo". They realise they have been betrayed by Aaron Sherritt and arrange for him to be shot. They then take over the hotel at Glenrowan.
Betty Phillips as "The Roo", Ned Kelly's girlfriend
Betty Kauffman as Mrs Skerritt
Roland Redshaw
Production
Stewart said one of the play's themes was "the conflict between the over-civilised man and the outlaw and the necessity for a balance between the two attitudes to life. Part of the spirit that was in the celebrated bushranger is still in the Australian character - the deep desire for freedom and impatience with authority."[3]
In July 1959 it was announced the production would be filmed at ABC's Melbourne studios at Ripponlea, with the scene of Kelly's capture shot on location at Glenrowan.[4]
In early August Sterling and a crew did an initial reconnaissance of the Glenrowan area.[5] A unit went out to Glenrowan in late August for three days of filming. A historic building outside the town, the building originally occupied by Constable Bracken, was dressed up to look like the Royal Hotel in Jerilderie. There was also filming at the Strathbogie Ranges and Beaconsfield. William Sterling said this footage could not be duplicated anywhere else in Victoria.[6][7] Cameraman Les Hendy used an 18-foot hydraulic crane to film at Beaconsfield.[8][9] Scenes were also shot at Guy's Hill.[10]
Robert Hughes wrote the music score, which also included bush songs from the Kelly years.[5] Les Hendy was cameraman, Harold Fletcher did props, Brian Faull was location manager and Audrey Rogers script assistant.[11]
Release
Ned Kelly aired on 21 October 1959 in Melbourne on GTV-9 and on 26 January 1960 in Sydney.
Reception
The TV critic from the Sydney Morning Herald thought the production "did a disservice to Douglas Stewart's richly poetic and deeply probing play" in the adaptation "which, with the real meat of the play removed, dealt with very little except its bare skeleton." He complained several important speeches were removed and "the play lost its proper perspective" and that William Sterling's direction, "after a promising beginning, failed to bring off a number of all too tricky camera effects."[12]
The critic for The Age felt the program was too influenced by American Western TV shows although adding "there were many praiseworthy features about this production" saying "the outdoor scenes were excellently filmed and the film was blended with the studio presentations more effectively than any 'live' drama I have previously seen... The female characters... were very impressive... it was an interesting and rewarding experiment and I for one would enjoy watching it again."[13] The review prompted a reply from William Sterling where he argued "let's go our own way in television and receive constructive criticism or praise for what we attempt to do for our own history and let us not perpetuate the purely imaginary and stereotyped methods of the average Hollywood television film."[14]
