An unexpected emergent property of a complex system may be a result of the interplay of the cause-and-effect among simpler, integrated parts (see biological organisation). Biological systems manifest many important examples of emergent properties in the complex interplay of components. Traditional study of biological systems requires reductive methods in which quantities of data are gathered by category, such as concentration over time in response to a certain stimulus. Computers are critical to analysis and modelling of these data. The goal is to create accurate real-time models of a system's response to environmental and internal stimuli, such as a model of a cancer cell in order to find weaknesses in its signalling pathways, or modelling of ion channel mutations to see effects on cardiomyocytes and in turn, the function of a beating heart.
Standards
By far the most widely accepted standard format for storing and exchanging models in the field is the Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML).[3] The SBML.org website includes a guide to many important software packages used in computational systems biology. A large number of models encoded in SBML can be retrieved from BioModels. Other markup languages with different emphases include BioPAX and CellML.
The complex network of biochemical reaction/transport processes and their spatial organization make the development of a predictive model of a living cell a grand challenge for the 21st century, listed as such by the National Science Foundation (NSF) in 2006.[5]
A whole cell computational model for the bacterium Mycoplasma genitalium, including all its 525 genes, gene products, and their interactions, was built by scientists from Stanford University and the J. Craig Venter Institute and published on 20 July 2012 in Cell.[6]
A dynamic computer model of intracellular signaling was the basis for Merrimack Pharmaceuticals to discover the target for their cancer medicine MM-111.[7]
An open source simulation of C. elegans at the cellular level is being pursued by the OpenWorm community. So far the physics engine Gepetto has been built and models of the neural connectome and a muscle cell have been created in the NeuroML format.[8]
The Blue Brain Project is an attempt to create a synthetic brain by reverse-engineering the mammalian brain down to the molecular level. The aim of this project, founded in May 2005 by the Brain and Mind Institute of the École Polytechnique in Lausanne, Switzerland, is to study the brain's architectural and functional principles. The project is headed by the Institute's director, Henry Markram. Using a Blue Genesupercomputer running Michael Hines's NEURON software, the simulation does not consist simply of an artificial neural network, but involves a partially biologically realistic model of neurons.[9][10] It is hoped by its proponents that it will eventually shed light on the nature of consciousness.
There are a number of sub-projects, including the Cajal Blue Brain, coordinated by the Supercomputing and Visualization Center of Madrid (CeSViMa), and others run by universities and independent laboratories in the UK, U.S., and Israel. The Human Brain Project builds on the work of the Blue Brain Project.[11][12] It is one of six pilot projects in the Future Emerging Technologies Research Program of the European Commission,[13] competing for a billion euro funding.
Model of the immune system
The last decade has seen the emergence of a growing number of simulations of the immune system.[14][15]
Virtual liver
The Virtual Liver project is a 43 million euro research program funded by the German Government, made up of seventy research group distributed across Germany. The goal is to produce a virtual liver, a dynamic mathematical model that represents human liver physiology, morphology and function.[16]
Electronic trees (e-trees) usually use L-systems to simulate growth. L-systems are very important in the field of complexity science and A-life.
A universally accepted system for describing changes in plant morphology at the cellular or modular level has yet to be devised.[17]
The most widely implemented tree generating algorithms are described in the papers "Creation and Rendering of Realistic Trees" and Real-Time Tree Rendering.
The purpose of models in ecotoxicology is the understanding, simulation and prediction of effects caused by toxicants in the environment. Most current models describe effects on one of many different levels of biological organization (e.g. organisms or populations). A challenge is the development of models that predict effects across biological scales. Ecotoxicology and models discusses some types of ecotoxicological models and provides links to many others.
It is possible to model the progress of most infectious diseases mathematically to discover the likely outcome of an epidemic or to help manage them by vaccination. This field tries to find parameters for various infectious diseases and to use those parameters to make useful calculations about the effects of a mass vaccination programme.
^Sometimes called theoretical biology, dry biology, or even biomathematics.
^Computational systems biology is a branch that strives to generate a system-level understanding by analyzing biological data using computational techniques.
References
^Andres Kriete, Roland Eils, Computational Systems Biology, Elsevier Academic Press, 2006.
Bonneau, R. (2008). "Learning biological networks* from modules to dynamics". Nature Chemical Biology. 4 (11): 658–664. doi:10.1038/nchembio.122. PMID18936750.
Edwards, J. S.; Ibarra, R. U.; Palsson, B. O. (2001). "In silico predictions of Escherichia coli metabolic capabilities are consistent with experimental data". Nature Biotechnology. 19 (2): 125–130. doi:10.1038/84379. PMID11175725. S2CID1619105.
Gilman, A. G.; Simon, M. I.; Bourne, H. R.; Harris, B. A.; Long, R.; Ross, E. M.; Stull, J. T.; Taussig, R.; Bourne, H. R.; Arkin, A. P.; Cobb, M. H.; Cyster, J. G.; Devreotes, P. N.; Ferrell, J. E.; Fruman, D.; Gold, M.; Weiss, A.; Stull, J. T.; Berridge, M. J.; Cantley, L. C.; Catterall, W. A.; Coughlin, S. R.; Olson, E. N.; Smith, T. F.; Brugge, J. S.; Botstein, D.; Dixon, J. E.; Hunter, T.; Lefkowitz, R. J.; Pawson, A. J. (2002). "Overview of the Alliance for Cellular Signaling"(PDF). Nature. 420 (6916): 703–706. Bibcode:2002Natur.420..703G. doi:10.1038/nature01304. PMID12478301. S2CID4367083.
Palsson, Bernhard (2006). Systems biology* properties of reconstructed networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-521-85903-5.
Kauffman; Prakash, P.; Edwards, J. S. (2003). "Advances in flux balance analysis". Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 14 (5): 491–496. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2003.08.001. PMID14580578.