2017 United States Supreme Court case
Life Technologies Corp. v. Promega Corp. |
---|
|
|
Full case name | Life Technologies Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. Promega Corporation |
---|
Docket no. | 14–1538 |
---|
Citations | 580 U.S. ___ (more) |
---|
|
Prior | Promega Corp. v. Life Techs. Corp., 773 F.3d 1338 (Fed. Cir. 2014); cert. granted, 136 S. Ct. 2505 (2016). |
---|
Procedural | On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit |
---|
|
The sale of a single component of a patented invention in a foreign market does not give rise to liability under the Patent Act of 1952. |
|
- Chief Justice
- John Roberts
- Associate Justices
- Anthony Kennedy · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor Elena Kagan
|
|
Majority | Sotomayor, joined by Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan; Thomas, Alito (all but Part II–C) |
---|
Concurrence | Alito (in part), joined by Thomas |
---|
Roberts took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. |
|
Patent Act of 1952, 35 U.S.C. § 271 et seq. |
Life Technologies Corp. v. Promega Corp., 580 U.S. ___ (2017), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court clarified the application of the Patent Act of 1952 to the sale of components of patented inventions in foreign markets.[1] In an opinion written by Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, the Court held that the sale of a "single component" in a foreign market "does not constitute a substantial portion of the components that can give rise to liability under [the Patent Act of 1952]."[2] Justice Samuel Alito wrote an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which he was joined Justice Clarence Thomas.[3] Chief Justice John Roberts took no part in the decision of the case.[4]
See also
References
- ^ Life Technologies Corp. v. Promega Corp., No. 14-1538, 580 U.S. ___ (2017), slip. op. at 1.
- ^ Life Technologies Corp., slip op. at 1, 11 (citing 35 U.S.C. § 271(f)(1)).
- ^ Life Technologies Corp., slip op. at 1 (Alito, J., concurring in part and concurring in the judgment).
- ^ Life Technologies Corp., slip op. at 11.
External links