1967 United States Supreme Court case
Beecher v. Alabama, 389 U.S. 35 (1967), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that eliciting a confession from a suspect while he was under the influence of morphine and recovering from a gunshot wound violated the Due Process Clause.[1][2]
Description
Although the decision was unanimous and unsigned, the four concurring justices disagreed with describing this as a violation of the Due Process Clause. The four would have described it as a violation of the Fifth Amendment's self-incrimination protections, which had recently been incorporated against the states in Malloy v. Hogan.[2]
References
- ^ Beecher v. Alabama, 389 U.S. 35 (1967)
- ^ a b Stephens, Jr., Otis H. (1973). The Supreme Court and Confessions of Guilt. pp. 149–150.
External links