Andrew Spence (born 1947) is an American artist known for abstract paintings that combine a minimalist vocabulary with playful references to the observed world.[1][2][3] In the 1970s and 1980s, he gained recognition as one of a number of younger artists who were re-examining geometric modernism through a contemporary lens that invited humor and reference to everyday objects and life experience into the tradition.[4][5][6][7] Spence's method of distilling visual phenomena into simple, emblematic images has been compared to Ellsworth Kelly, but his work has differed in its more even balance between abstraction and recognition (often aided by the picture titles), intuitive approach, and varied, expressive paint surfaces.[8][9][10][11]Art in America critic Ken Johnson wrote that his work maintains "an ironic tension between lofty purism of modernist geometry and earth-bound ordinariness of the vernacular sources."[12] In later paintings, Spence has increasingly obscured the original inspirations of his abstractions, in both form and titling.[1][13] His work belongs to the permanent collections of the Metropolitan Museum of Art,[14]Museum of Modern Art,[15] and Whitney Museum of American Art,[16] among others. He has received a Guggenheim Fellowship and awards from the American Academy of Arts and Letters and National Endowment for the Arts.[17][18]
In 1977, Spence moved to New York City, where he exhibited in seven solo shows at the Barbara Toll Gallery between 1982 and 1990.[1][24][9] He has had subsequent exhibitions at the Worcester Art Museum (1991) and Max Protetch Gallery (1992, 1993), Edward Thorp Gallery (2001, 2002, 2006) and 57W57 Arts (2016) in New York, among others.[25][12][26] He also appeared in the 1989 Whitney Biennial, the 40th Biennial at the Corcoran Gallery of Art (1987), and group exhibitions at the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Whitney Museum.[27][28][29][30]
Spence lives and works in New York with his wife, Sique Spence.[21]
Work and reception
Spence's work has been related to minimalist predecessors such as Constructivism, Malevich and McLaughlin, as well as to contemporary movements such as Neo-Geo.[5][8] However, critics suggest that it evades simple categorization, developing out of an intuitive "internal momentum,"[7] rather than theoretical frameworks or ideological trends.[9][31][13] Eleanor Heartney wrote that his "quietly effective paintings steer a course between the austere reductiveness of an Ellsworth Kelly and the self-proclaimed negation of a Peter Halley."[9] Writers point to Spence's synthesis of humanizing aspects outside the formalist tradition as defining characteristics: a quirky sense of humor and associativeness;[24][9] the use of personal imagery and observed experience;[31][32][8] a populist enthusiasm for vernacular design and the breakdown of high-low distinctions;[33][12][34] and densely worked surfaces that reveal the artistic process and impart an emotional quality to otherwise cool work.[7][1]
Spence's art often occupies an ambiguous position between abstract and representational, sophisticated and ordinary, and meditative and deadpan that is echoed by shifting figure-ground relationships.[35][32][12][1] His paintings arise out of a rigorous drawing process, which results in schematic images refined to edge of recognition and a core of essence.[36][2] This formal concision extends to his use of color, which is non-associative, and while sometimes bold, often limited to two or three colors, one of which is nearly always white.[20][7]Carol Diehl wrote that the work's "innate drollness" is offset by Spence's acute attention to surface.[10] While his paintings appear flat and hard-edged in reproduction, reviewers frequently note their physicality and dense, varied textures.[37][12][34] Spence builds them in waxy layers applied with a paint-laden palette knife, creating shapes with nearly engraved edges that he sands and polishes to an opaque sheen.[1][10][8]
Early work: 1970s
Spence first received attention in the mid-1970s for abstract work compared to modernists from Malevich to Barnett Newman in terms of its reductive visual grammar, geometric integrity and stillness.[38][4][23][39] The paintings referenced the texture and color of Los Angeles's built environment (e.g., prefabricated homes and trailers, aluminum siding or painted walls), incorporating molded-acrylic structural elements, abutting panels, impersonal industrial hues, and thickly applied enamel that sometimes formed vertical spines dividing color areas.[22][4][38] Critics compared them to "abstract facades ripped out of context" situated between paintings and painted objects,[40] and physical coarseness and compositional elegance.[35]Artweek's Suzanne Muchnic wrote "Spence attends to the anonymous, manmade beauty frequently overlooked in mundane surroundings";[22]Los Angeles Times critic William Wilson likened the contemplative quality of the textured surfaces to the metaphysical paintings of Giorgio Morandi.[23][4]
Mature work
In the 1980s, Spence moved away from a rectilinear vocabulary, incorporating arcs, spirals and triangles and biomorphic shapes into his work.[36][5] His images initially consisted of singular, iconic images in limited colors that were embedded in heavily textured surfaces and read like graphic language symbols or fragments of advertising logos.[24][36] As the decade progressed, he turned increasingly to tongue-in-cheek, schematic renderings of common objects and architecture or modernist furniture (e.g., Light, 1987), whose inspirations and eccentric perspectival views (often overhead) only became apparent through the picture titles.[24][30][6] For example, Swivel Chairs (1988) drew on the well-known Eames armchair design, while Blue Canoe (1988) presented a field of horizontal stripes, two of which were blue and altered to mimic half-canoe shapes.[7][9]
Critics such as Eleanor Heartney and Stephen Westfall contrasted the work's minimalist qualities—frontality, figure-ground equilibrium, a sense of planar rigor, proportion and balance—with its divergences from the tradition: idiosyncratic references to manufactured objects, elemental concepts and life experiences and an emphasis on the artist's hand, conveyed through expressive, evidently reworked surfaces.[5][9][7][41] Heartney described paintings such as Ivy Windows (1988) as "simple without being simplistic," comparing its subtle and intricate relationships between shape, negative space and proportion and irregular rhythmic patterns to Mondrian's Broadway Boogie Woogie.[9]
By the end of the 1980s, Spence shifted toward enigmatic, formal compositions whose titles were comparably cryptic, seeking to extend viewer engagement with the work.[32][20] For example, Commander (1989) and Citibanker (1990)—inspired respectively by a television remote control and an ATM—each presented spare abstractions of shifting planes, squares and rectangles, rendered in heavy, textured brushwork and surfaces scraped into smooth patinas.[20][25] The minimal forms of Sculpture/Painting (1989) offered Spence's humorous recreation of the sight of his work behind a sculpture at the Whitney Biennial, as well as a meditation on the arbitrary nature of various art distinctions—representational, abstract, flat, three-dimensional, object and image.[20][32]
Between 1993 and 1996, in shows at Max Protetch and Morris Healy, Spence continued to create visual complexity within simple configurations, relying on plays with similarity and difference, precise cropping, and repetition to push his images further into the nonfunctional, purely aesthetic realm.[33][42][43][34] Two-color works, such as Up and Up and Space Saver (both 1993), alternated in terms of figure and ground to complicate readings, while others, like Cover Up (1993) and Goggleplex (1995), rotated and repeated simple forms (zigzags or letters, outlines of goggles) to create rhythmic visual puzzles that, given time, snapped into recognizability for viewers.[12][44][3]
In the 2000s, Spence altered his palette (often using bright saturated colors, in greater quantities), approach to pictorial space, and according to Carol Diehl, his content, shifting toward more fanciful images inspired by emotions rather than the emblematic objects of his past work.[10][26][45][1] For example, works such as Bob (2002), presented complex spatial and optical effects that shifted under scrutiny, in that case, using horizontal stripes that changed color to suggest an ovoid shape in motion against a rectangle and curve.[10][26]Faye Hirsch noted in Spence's 2006 show at Edward Thorp a relaxed approach to allusion that introduced a wider range of visual jokes and puns. The paintings Hidden Landscape (2005) and Untitled (Camouflage) (2004) combined bright and stereotypically girly colors with camouflage patterns, undermining traditional associations (masculinity, concealment); the lines and squiggles of Squid (2003) suggested both the aquatic creature and a lightbulb and its filaments.[1]
Spence has turned to linear forms that suggest contemporary signage, architectural schematics or scaffolding, and further disguise his original inspirations in much of his later work.[13][46][47] Earlier examples include Paint Run (2005)—which features a scaffold-like red line overlaid on pink and light green blocks—and Red Line (2005)—a continuous, red stroke tracing sideways flames on white.[1] Later works, such as Red Pink White 3 (2011) or Untitled Brown/Violet (2018), use spare lines and shapes to suggest layered or shifting two-dimensional planes within or on the periphery of canvasses, and continue Spence's longstanding explorations of picture, object, architecture and design.[46][48]
^ abLeClair, Charles. "Minimalism and Postmodern Attitudes," Color In Contemporary Painting, New York: Watson Guptil, 1991, p. 72–3. Retrieved May 24, 2021.
^ abcdMyers, Terry, "Andrew Spence," Arts Magazine, September 1990.
^ abPardee, Hearne. "Andrew Spence," ARTnews, Summer 1992, p. 130–1.
^ abcHarris, Jane. "Andy Spence," Review, November 1996, p. 24.
^ abApp, Timothy. "Six Approaches to Formalist Abstraction," Artweek, March 5, 1977, p. 7.
^ abcArmstrong, Richard "Andrew Spence", Artforum, December 1983, p. 83. Retrieved May 18, 2021.
^Hornung, David. "Andrew Spence", ARTnews, January 1989, p. 134.
^ abRush, David. "Andrew Spence: Avoiding Gravity Plays," Artweek, September 25, 1976, p. 7.